Anticoagulation therapy for the prevention of subclinical leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive literature review and future directions

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132946
Norma Nicole Gamarra-Valverde , Diane Masket , Mariana L. Henry , Adriana C. Mares , Tasha Phillips-Wilson , Apurva Bhavana Challa , Khristian Burke , Lina Ayasrah , Udochukwu Godswill Anosike , Enrique Garcia-Sayan
{"title":"Anticoagulation therapy for the prevention of subclinical leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive literature review and future directions","authors":"Norma Nicole Gamarra-Valverde ,&nbsp;Diane Masket ,&nbsp;Mariana L. Henry ,&nbsp;Adriana C. Mares ,&nbsp;Tasha Phillips-Wilson ,&nbsp;Apurva Bhavana Challa ,&nbsp;Khristian Burke ,&nbsp;Lina Ayasrah ,&nbsp;Udochukwu Godswill Anosike ,&nbsp;Enrique Garcia-Sayan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) presents a significant challenge, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is increasingly recognized, and there is a growing concern about its role in clinical events and hemodynamic valve deterioration. Current recommendations for prophylactic anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy following TAVR are primarily based on expert consensus rather than definitive evidence from randomized trials, resulting in a variety of antithrombotic strategies in clinical practice. While observational data suggest that prophylactic anticoagulation may be beneficial, clinical trial results are inconsistent, particularly for patients without an existing indication for OAC. Given the conflicting findings and potential safety concerns associated with prophylactic anticoagulation, further research is imperative. This review aims to summarize the existing literature on risk factors for SLT, preventive strategies, current recommendations, and future research directions to better understand the benefits and risks of prophylactic anticoagulation in this context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"422 ","pages":"Article 132946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324015687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) presents a significant challenge, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is increasingly recognized, and there is a growing concern about its role in clinical events and hemodynamic valve deterioration. Current recommendations for prophylactic anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy following TAVR are primarily based on expert consensus rather than definitive evidence from randomized trials, resulting in a variety of antithrombotic strategies in clinical practice. While observational data suggest that prophylactic anticoagulation may be beneficial, clinical trial results are inconsistent, particularly for patients without an existing indication for OAC. Given the conflicting findings and potential safety concerns associated with prophylactic anticoagulation, further research is imperative. This review aims to summarize the existing literature on risk factors for SLT, preventive strategies, current recommendations, and future research directions to better understand the benefits and risks of prophylactic anticoagulation in this context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗凝治疗预防经导管主动脉瓣置换术后亚临床小叶血栓形成:综合文献综述及未来发展方向
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后小叶血栓形成是一个重大挑战,导致不良的临床结果。亚临床小叶血栓形成(SLT)越来越被人们所认识,并且越来越关注其在临床事件和血流动力学瓣膜恶化中的作用。目前关于TAVR后预防性抗凝或抗血小板治疗的建议主要基于专家共识,而不是随机试验的明确证据,导致临床实践中的抗血栓策略多种多样。虽然观察性数据表明预防性抗凝可能是有益的,但临床试验结果并不一致,特别是对于没有OAC指征的患者。鉴于相互矛盾的发现和与预防性抗凝相关的潜在安全问题,进一步的研究是必要的。本文旨在对SLT的危险因素、预防策略、目前的建议和未来的研究方向进行综述,以更好地了解在这种情况下预防性抗凝治疗的益处和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
期刊最新文献
Associations of circulating trans fatty acids with natriuretic peptides: Metaphorical saponification and the heart. Long-term outcomes of hospitalised patients with de novo and acute decompensated heart failure The association of bisphosphonates, calcium levels and PTH levels with bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration1 Prevalence of obesity among adult patients with congenital heart disease: A population-based study. Remote dielectric sensing to detect pulmonary congestion in acute dyspnoeic patients: Reproducibility and the effect of pulmonary comorbidities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1