Patient-specific cutting guides allow 1° precision in asymmetric anterior closing-wedge osteotomy

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70131
Julien Leluc, Ahmed Mabrouk, Jacob Hirth, Danyal Nawabi, Christophe Jacquet, Matthieu Ollivier
{"title":"Patient-specific cutting guides allow 1° precision in asymmetric anterior closing-wedge osteotomy","authors":"Julien Leluc,&nbsp;Ahmed Mabrouk,&nbsp;Jacob Hirth,&nbsp;Danyal Nawabi,&nbsp;Christophe Jacquet,&nbsp;Matthieu Ollivier","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Asymmetric anterior closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (ACWHTO) allows correction of both excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS) and varus deformity. However, the complexity of this surgery requires a high degree of accuracy, which is less likely to be achieved with standard instrumentations. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of 3D patient-specific cutting guides (PSCGs) to provide the accurate planned correction in the frontal and sagittal planes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eight sawbones tibiae were identically printed from the same patient data. An ACWHTO with a PSCG was performed on each sawbone. Postoperative measurements of PTS, mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), hinge area and hinge–posterior cruciate ligament (hinge–PCL) distance were compared with the preoperative planned measurements. The precision was defined as the absolute difference (∆) between the target planned values and postoperative values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean accuracy was 0.6° ± 0.74° for PTS, 0.8° ± 0.71° for mMPTA, 0.3 ± 0.2 cm<sup>2</sup> for hinge area and 0.1 ± 0.06 mm for hinge–PCL distance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In the setting of sawbones, the use of PSCGs was a reliable and accurate method of achieving simultaneous correction in the frontal and sagittal planes during asymmetric ACWHTO.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level V, basic science biomechanical laboratory study.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Asymmetric anterior closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (ACWHTO) allows correction of both excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS) and varus deformity. However, the complexity of this surgery requires a high degree of accuracy, which is less likely to be achieved with standard instrumentations. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of 3D patient-specific cutting guides (PSCGs) to provide the accurate planned correction in the frontal and sagittal planes.

Methods

Eight sawbones tibiae were identically printed from the same patient data. An ACWHTO with a PSCG was performed on each sawbone. Postoperative measurements of PTS, mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), hinge area and hinge–posterior cruciate ligament (hinge–PCL) distance were compared with the preoperative planned measurements. The precision was defined as the absolute difference (∆) between the target planned values and postoperative values.

Results

The mean accuracy was 0.6° ± 0.74° for PTS, 0.8° ± 0.71° for mMPTA, 0.3 ± 0.2 cm2 for hinge area and 0.1 ± 0.06 mm for hinge–PCL distance.

Conclusion

In the setting of sawbones, the use of PSCGs was a reliable and accurate method of achieving simultaneous correction in the frontal and sagittal planes during asymmetric ACWHTO.

Level of Evidence

Level V, basic science biomechanical laboratory study.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者特异性切割导向器在不对称前路闭合楔形截骨术中可达到1°精度。
目的:非对称前收楔高胫骨截骨术(ACWHTO)可同时矫正过高的胫骨后斜度(PTS)和胫骨内翻畸形。然而,这种手术的复杂性要求高度的准确性,而标准器械不太可能实现这一点。本研究旨在确定三维患者特异性切割导板(PSCGs)的准确性,以便在正面和矢状面上提供准确的计划矫正:八块锯骨胫骨由相同的患者数据打印而成。方法:根据同一患者的数据打印出八块相同的锯骨胫骨,在每块锯骨上使用 PSCG 进行 ACWHTO。术后PTS、机械胫骨内侧近端角(mMPTA)、铰链面积和铰链-后交叉韧带(铰链-PCL)距离的测量结果与术前计划测量结果进行比较。精确度定义为目标计划值与术后值之间的绝对差值(∆):结果:PTS 的平均精确度为 0.6° ± 0.74°,mMPTA 为 0.8° ± 0.71°,铰链面积为 0.3 ± 0.2 平方厘米,铰链-PCL 距离为 0.1 ± 0.06 毫米:结论:在锯骨的情况下,使用 PSCGs 是一种可靠而准确的方法,可在不对称 ACWHTO 过程中实现正面和矢状面上的同步矫正:证据等级:V级,基础科学生物力学实验室研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Calcaneo-stop for paediatric idiopathic flexible flatfoot: High functional results and return to sport in 644 feet at mid-term follow-up Reproducibility of a new device for robotic-assisted TKA surgery The central fibre areas in the tibial footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament show the highest contribution to restriction of a posterior drawer force—A biomechanical robotic investigation The short version of the ALR-RSI scale is a valid and reproducible scale to evaluate psychological readiness to return to sport after ankle lateral reconstruction Which treatment strategy for irreparable rotator cuff tears is most cost-effective? A Markov model-based cost-utility analysis comparing superior capsular reconstruction, lower trapezius tendon transfer, subacromial balloon spacer implantation and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1