Reproducibility of a new device for robotic-assisted TKA surgery

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70153
Domenico Alesi, Vito Gaetano Rinaldi, Tosca Cerasoli, Davide Valente, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Stefano Zaffagnini
{"title":"Reproducibility of a new device for robotic-assisted TKA surgery","authors":"Domenico Alesi,&nbsp;Vito Gaetano Rinaldi,&nbsp;Tosca Cerasoli,&nbsp;Davide Valente,&nbsp;Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli,&nbsp;Stefano Zaffagnini","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Enhancing implant placement to achieve optimal gap balance is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Given the limited precision of traditional instrumentation, tools like computer-assisted surgery and robotic-assisted TKA have emerged. This experimental cadaveric study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the collaborative image-free Robin robotic system to support its future clinical application.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen cadaveric specimens were treated by eight experienced TKA surgeons. All surgeons, experts in computer-assisted TKA but new to the Robin system, received standardized training. The Robin system uses a robotic arm to position and hold a universal cutting jig, while surgeons perform osteotomies. The indicator for registration repeatability was the alignment of the cutting block position with the previous pin placement. Bony resection, angles and axes were evaluated by comparing the preoperative planning values to the ones obtained with the Robin system with a validated navigation system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no statistically significant differences between the planned and measured values for most resection angles, except for femoral and tibial orientation on sagittal plane (0.6 ± 0.8° and 0.6 ± 1.0°, respectively). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were recorded for resection thickness values, except for the distal medial femoral cut (0.8 ± 0.7 mm). Moreover, these results showed consistency among the different first-time users.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study found that the Robin robotic system closely matched the preoperative plan for TKA, demonstrating high accuracy and consistency among first-time users. This allows surgeons to easily achieve their planned targets without having to adapt their surgical technique, potentially improving both efficiency and outcomes even when handling complex cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Not applicable.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70153","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Enhancing implant placement to achieve optimal gap balance is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Given the limited precision of traditional instrumentation, tools like computer-assisted surgery and robotic-assisted TKA have emerged. This experimental cadaveric study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the collaborative image-free Robin robotic system to support its future clinical application.

Methods

Fifteen cadaveric specimens were treated by eight experienced TKA surgeons. All surgeons, experts in computer-assisted TKA but new to the Robin system, received standardized training. The Robin system uses a robotic arm to position and hold a universal cutting jig, while surgeons perform osteotomies. The indicator for registration repeatability was the alignment of the cutting block position with the previous pin placement. Bony resection, angles and axes were evaluated by comparing the preoperative planning values to the ones obtained with the Robin system with a validated navigation system.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the planned and measured values for most resection angles, except for femoral and tibial orientation on sagittal plane (0.6 ± 0.8° and 0.6 ± 1.0°, respectively). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were recorded for resection thickness values, except for the distal medial femoral cut (0.8 ± 0.7 mm). Moreover, these results showed consistency among the different first-time users.

Conclusions

The study found that the Robin robotic system closely matched the preoperative plan for TKA, demonstrating high accuracy and consistency among first-time users. This allows surgeons to easily achieve their planned targets without having to adapt their surgical technique, potentially improving both efficiency and outcomes even when handling complex cases.

Level of Evidence

Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助TKA手术新装置的可重复性
目的在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中加强假体置入以达到最佳间隙平衡是至关重要的。鉴于传统仪器的精度有限,计算机辅助手术和机器人辅助TKA等工具已经出现。本实验尸体研究旨在评估协作无图像Robin机器人系统的准确性和可重复性,以支持其未来的临床应用。方法由8名经验丰富的TKA外科医生对15例尸体标本进行处理。所有外科医生,计算机辅助TKA专家,但对Robin系统不熟悉,都接受了标准化培训。当外科医生进行截骨手术时,Robin系统使用机械臂来定位和握住通用切割夹具。配准可重复性的指标是切割块位置与先前引脚位置的对齐。通过将术前计划值与Robin系统和经过验证的导航系统获得的结果进行比较,评估骨切除、角度和轴向。结果除矢状面股骨和胫骨方向(分别为0.6±0.8°和0.6±1.0°)外,大多数切除角度的计划值与实测值无统计学差异。同样,除股骨内侧远端切口(0.8±0.7 mm)外,切除厚度值无统计学差异。此外,这些结果显示了不同首次用户之间的一致性。研究发现Robin机器人系统与TKA术前计划紧密匹配,在首次使用者中表现出较高的准确性和一致性。这使得外科医生无需调整手术技术即可轻松实现计划目标,即使在处理复杂病例时也可能提高效率和结果。证据等级不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Autologous minced cartilage implantation for unstable osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow demonstrates favourable clinical and imaging outcomes at a mean 2-year follow-up. Quantitative analysis of bony and soft tissue contributions to varus deformity across knee osteoarthritis stages. Standardised Transparent Orthopaedic Reporting and Modelling for AI (STORM-AI)-Guidelines for reporting artificial intelligence studies in orthopaedics from the ESSKA AI Working Group. A lower talar tunnel placement is associated with postoperative recurrent sprain in CLAI patients following anatomic reconstruction. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1