Reproducibility of a new device for robotic-assisted TKA surgery

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70153
Domenico Alesi, Vito Gaetano Rinaldi, Tosca Cerasoli, Davide Valente, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Stefano Zaffagnini
{"title":"Reproducibility of a new device for robotic-assisted TKA surgery","authors":"Domenico Alesi,&nbsp;Vito Gaetano Rinaldi,&nbsp;Tosca Cerasoli,&nbsp;Davide Valente,&nbsp;Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli,&nbsp;Stefano Zaffagnini","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Enhancing implant placement to achieve optimal gap balance is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Given the limited precision of traditional instrumentation, tools like computer-assisted surgery and robotic-assisted TKA have emerged. This experimental cadaveric study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the collaborative image-free Robin robotic system to support its future clinical application.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen cadaveric specimens were treated by eight experienced TKA surgeons. All surgeons, experts in computer-assisted TKA but new to the Robin system, received standardized training. The Robin system uses a robotic arm to position and hold a universal cutting jig, while surgeons perform osteotomies. The indicator for registration repeatability was the alignment of the cutting block position with the previous pin placement. Bony resection, angles and axes were evaluated by comparing the preoperative planning values to the ones obtained with the Robin system with a validated navigation system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no statistically significant differences between the planned and measured values for most resection angles, except for femoral and tibial orientation on sagittal plane (0.6 ± 0.8° and 0.6 ± 1.0°, respectively). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were recorded for resection thickness values, except for the distal medial femoral cut (0.8 ± 0.7 mm). Moreover, these results showed consistency among the different first-time users.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study found that the Robin robotic system closely matched the preoperative plan for TKA, demonstrating high accuracy and consistency among first-time users. This allows surgeons to easily achieve their planned targets without having to adapt their surgical technique, potentially improving both efficiency and outcomes even when handling complex cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Not applicable.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70153","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Enhancing implant placement to achieve optimal gap balance is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Given the limited precision of traditional instrumentation, tools like computer-assisted surgery and robotic-assisted TKA have emerged. This experimental cadaveric study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the collaborative image-free Robin robotic system to support its future clinical application.

Methods

Fifteen cadaveric specimens were treated by eight experienced TKA surgeons. All surgeons, experts in computer-assisted TKA but new to the Robin system, received standardized training. The Robin system uses a robotic arm to position and hold a universal cutting jig, while surgeons perform osteotomies. The indicator for registration repeatability was the alignment of the cutting block position with the previous pin placement. Bony resection, angles and axes were evaluated by comparing the preoperative planning values to the ones obtained with the Robin system with a validated navigation system.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the planned and measured values for most resection angles, except for femoral and tibial orientation on sagittal plane (0.6 ± 0.8° and 0.6 ± 1.0°, respectively). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were recorded for resection thickness values, except for the distal medial femoral cut (0.8 ± 0.7 mm). Moreover, these results showed consistency among the different first-time users.

Conclusions

The study found that the Robin robotic system closely matched the preoperative plan for TKA, demonstrating high accuracy and consistency among first-time users. This allows surgeons to easily achieve their planned targets without having to adapt their surgical technique, potentially improving both efficiency and outcomes even when handling complex cases.

Level of Evidence

Not applicable.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Calcaneo-stop for paediatric idiopathic flexible flatfoot: High functional results and return to sport in 644 feet at mid-term follow-up Reproducibility of a new device for robotic-assisted TKA surgery The central fibre areas in the tibial footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament show the highest contribution to restriction of a posterior drawer force—A biomechanical robotic investigation The short version of the ALR-RSI scale is a valid and reproducible scale to evaluate psychological readiness to return to sport after ankle lateral reconstruction Which treatment strategy for irreparable rotator cuff tears is most cost-effective? A Markov model-based cost-utility analysis comparing superior capsular reconstruction, lower trapezius tendon transfer, subacromial balloon spacer implantation and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1