Americans' support for future pandemic policies: insights from a national survey.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae171
Gillian K SteelFisher, Mary G Findling, Hannah L Caporello, Jazmyne Sutton, Emma Dewhurst, Katherine Evans, Brian C Castrucci
{"title":"Americans' support for future pandemic policies: insights from a national survey.","authors":"Gillian K SteelFisher, Mary G Findling, Hannah L Caporello, Jazmyne Sutton, Emma Dewhurst, Katherine Evans, Brian C Castrucci","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The arrival of bird flu (H5N1) is a poignant reminder of the need for public health leaders to understand Americans' evolving perspectives on pandemic mitigation policies. To guide response efforts, we conducted a nationally representative opinion survey among 1017 U.S. adults in 2024. Majorities said they would be likely to support each of 4 policies in a future pandemic scenario (related to masking requirements, school closures, restaurant closures, and healthcare worker vaccination requirements). About half (49%) were likely to support all 4 policies, while 32% expressed mixed support. Support varied by gender, age, race, ethnicity, income, metropolitan and parental status, political party, and COVID-specific comorbidities. Roughly 80% expressed concern that future pandemic policies would hurt the economy, be based on political or pharmaceutical company/business interests, pander to critics, or further polarize society. Results suggest public support for future pandemic policies may be wider than media reports suggest, though important divisions exist and concerns about design and implementation are widespread. The most appealing policies will explicitly consider economic impacts and target populations at risk during clear time frames, with scope for personal choice. Ensuring that policies are made without undue political or commercial influence will remain a central challenge for public health leaders.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 12","pages":"qxae171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The arrival of bird flu (H5N1) is a poignant reminder of the need for public health leaders to understand Americans' evolving perspectives on pandemic mitigation policies. To guide response efforts, we conducted a nationally representative opinion survey among 1017 U.S. adults in 2024. Majorities said they would be likely to support each of 4 policies in a future pandemic scenario (related to masking requirements, school closures, restaurant closures, and healthcare worker vaccination requirements). About half (49%) were likely to support all 4 policies, while 32% expressed mixed support. Support varied by gender, age, race, ethnicity, income, metropolitan and parental status, political party, and COVID-specific comorbidities. Roughly 80% expressed concern that future pandemic policies would hurt the economy, be based on political or pharmaceutical company/business interests, pander to critics, or further polarize society. Results suggest public support for future pandemic policies may be wider than media reports suggest, though important divisions exist and concerns about design and implementation are widespread. The most appealing policies will explicitly consider economic impacts and target populations at risk during clear time frames, with scope for personal choice. Ensuring that policies are made without undue political or commercial influence will remain a central challenge for public health leaders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国人对未来流行病政策的支持:一项全国性调查的启示。
禽流感(H5N1)的到来尖锐地提醒我们,公共卫生领导人有必要了解美国人对流行病缓解政策的不断演变的看法。为了指导应对工作,我们在2024年对1017名美国成年人进行了全国代表性的民意调查。大多数人表示,在未来大流行的情况下,他们可能会支持4项政策中的每一项(与屏蔽要求、关闭学校、关闭餐馆和卫生保健工作者接种疫苗要求有关)。大约一半(49%)的人可能支持所有4项政策,而32%的人表示混合支持。支持因性别、年龄、种族、民族、收入、城市和父母身份、政党以及特定于covid - 19的合并症而异。大约80%的人担心未来的流行病政策会损害经济,基于政治或制药公司/商业利益,迎合批评者,或进一步使社会两极分化。结果表明,公众对未来流行病政策的支持可能比媒体报道的要广泛,尽管存在重要分歧,对设计和实施的担忧也很普遍。最具吸引力的政策将在明确的时间框架内明确考虑经济影响和面临风险的目标人群,并留有个人选择的余地。确保政策的制定不受不适当的政治或商业影响,仍将是公共卫生领导人面临的一项核心挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limitations of the Washington Group Short Set in capturing moderate and severe mobility disabilities. Pediatric vaccination in pharmacies is not associated with delayed well-child visits among commercially insured children. What explains the growth in hospital assets from 2000 through 2019? A decomposition analysis. Leveraging stringency and lifecycle thinking to advance environmental sustainability in health technology regulation. Publishers face antitrust lawsuit with potential implications for peer review, duplicate submission, and dissemination practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1