Advancing a political economy approach to health using lessons from US antitrust and climate policy.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf008
Elizabeth Popp Berman
{"title":"Advancing a political economy approach to health using lessons from US antitrust and climate policy.","authors":"Elizabeth Popp Berman","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advocates of a political economy approach to US health policy center an analysis of power and the broad political, social, and economic landscape that enables or harms health. They must contend, however, with a dominant policy orientation focused on ensuring individual access to the existing healthcare system. This Policy Inquiry reviews the recent history of US antitrust and climate/industrial policy, both domains where policy movements taking a political economy approach have had significant and unexpected recent success, to draw lessons for health policy, in which a \"care economy\" movement aligned with political economy has had some momentum, but not produced major policy change. Advocates of a political economy approach to US health policy should continue to build on the momentum of the care economy movement while also looking for ways to tie healthcare market reform into the shifts in industrial policy and antitrust. Across both spaces, advocates should center the building of issue networks, make connections to historically resonant political themes, and, where possible, find ways to tap into the energy of youth organizers-all strategies shared across antitrust and climate policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxaf008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advocates of a political economy approach to US health policy center an analysis of power and the broad political, social, and economic landscape that enables or harms health. They must contend, however, with a dominant policy orientation focused on ensuring individual access to the existing healthcare system. This Policy Inquiry reviews the recent history of US antitrust and climate/industrial policy, both domains where policy movements taking a political economy approach have had significant and unexpected recent success, to draw lessons for health policy, in which a "care economy" movement aligned with political economy has had some momentum, but not produced major policy change. Advocates of a political economy approach to US health policy should continue to build on the momentum of the care economy movement while also looking for ways to tie healthcare market reform into the shifts in industrial policy and antitrust. Across both spaces, advocates should center the building of issue networks, make connections to historically resonant political themes, and, where possible, find ways to tap into the energy of youth organizers-all strategies shared across antitrust and climate policy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国医疗政策政治经济学方法的倡导者以分析权力以及促进或损害健康的广泛政治、社会和经济环境为中心。然而,他们必须与以确保个人使用现有医疗保健系统为重点的主流政策导向相抗衡。本政策探究回顾了美国反托拉斯和气候/工业政策的近代史,在这两个领域,采用政治经济学方法的政策运动最近都取得了意想不到的巨大成功,从而为医疗卫生政策提供了借鉴,在这两个领域,与政治经济学相一致的 "护理经济 "运动虽有一定的发展势头,但并未产生重大的政策变革。美国医疗政策政治经济学方法的倡导者应继续加强护理经济运动的势头,同时寻求将医疗市场改革与产业政策和反托拉斯的转变结合起来的方法。在这两个领域,倡导者都应以建立议题网络为中心,与历史上引起共鸣的政治主题建立联系,并在可能的情况下,设法利用青年组织者的能量--这些都是反托拉斯和气候政策的共同战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: What happens behind closed doors? Investigating care practices in nursing home and assisted living memory care units. The fundamental importance of social insurance for health equity. Advancing a political economy approach to health using lessons from US antitrust and climate policy. Centering marginalized care: Home care cooperatives and system change. Reviving public provisioning in US health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1