Comparing Immuno-oncology Combination Therapy With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Monotherapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Anticancer research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21873/anticanres.17426
Gaku Ishikawa, Keita Tamura, Yoshihiro Tsuchiya, Shunsuke Watanabe, Takemura Ayana, Sano Asuka, Kyohei Watanabe, Hiromitsu Watanabe, Yuto Matsushita, Daisuke Motoyama, Atsushi Otsuka, Teruo Inamoto
{"title":"Comparing Immuno-oncology Combination Therapy With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Monotherapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Gaku Ishikawa, Keita Tamura, Yoshihiro Tsuchiya, Shunsuke Watanabe, Takemura Ayana, Sano Asuka, Kyohei Watanabe, Hiromitsu Watanabe, Yuto Matsushita, Daisuke Motoyama, Atsushi Otsuka, Teruo Inamoto","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Immuno-oncology (IO) improves the prognosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Since research has so far been limited to clinical trials, we herein focused on the effects of IO-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy in real-world clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study on 125 patients with advanced RCC who received IO-TKI combination therapy or TKI monotherapy. Oncological outcomes were assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for PFS and OS were investigated. We then evaluated PFS and OS based on the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IO-TKI group showed significantly longer median PFS (18.6 months vs. 10.1 months, p=0.008) and OS (not reached vs. 34.2 months, p=0.041) than the TKI group. A multivariate analysis identified the Karnofsky performance risk score, first-line therapy (IO-TKI combination therapy or TKI monotherapy), and high C-reactive protein levels as poor prognostic factors for both PFS and OS. PFS did not significantly differ in IMDC favorable-risk patients between the groups but was significantly longer in IMDC intermediate- and poor-risk patients in the IO-TKI group than in the TKI group. OS did not significantly differ in IMDC favorable- and intermediate-risk patients between the groups but was significantly longer in IMDC poor-risk patients in the IO-TKI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated the advantage of IO-TKI combination therapy compared to TKI monotherapy in real-world clinical settings. However, in IMDC favorable patients PFS and OS did not significantly differ to TKI monotherapy. This may indicate the need for caution when selecting treatment options for IMDC favorable-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 1","pages":"379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Immuno-oncology (IO) improves the prognosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Since research has so far been limited to clinical trials, we herein focused on the effects of IO-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy in real-world clinical settings.

Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 125 patients with advanced RCC who received IO-TKI combination therapy or TKI monotherapy. Oncological outcomes were assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for PFS and OS were investigated. We then evaluated PFS and OS based on the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC).

Results: The IO-TKI group showed significantly longer median PFS (18.6 months vs. 10.1 months, p=0.008) and OS (not reached vs. 34.2 months, p=0.041) than the TKI group. A multivariate analysis identified the Karnofsky performance risk score, first-line therapy (IO-TKI combination therapy or TKI monotherapy), and high C-reactive protein levels as poor prognostic factors for both PFS and OS. PFS did not significantly differ in IMDC favorable-risk patients between the groups but was significantly longer in IMDC intermediate- and poor-risk patients in the IO-TKI group than in the TKI group. OS did not significantly differ in IMDC favorable- and intermediate-risk patients between the groups but was significantly longer in IMDC poor-risk patients in the IO-TKI group.

Conclusion: We demonstrated the advantage of IO-TKI combination therapy compared to TKI monotherapy in real-world clinical settings. However, in IMDC favorable patients PFS and OS did not significantly differ to TKI monotherapy. This may indicate the need for caution when selecting treatment options for IMDC favorable-risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫肿瘤联合治疗与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂单药治疗晚期肾细胞癌的比较。
背景/目的:免疫肿瘤学(IO)改善晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)的预后。由于迄今为止的研究仅限于临床试验,因此我们在此重点关注io -酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)联合治疗在实际临床环境中的效果。患者和方法:我们对125例接受IO-TKI联合治疗或TKI单药治疗的晚期RCC患者进行了回顾性研究。肿瘤预后通过无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)进行评估,并研究PFS和OS的预后因素。然后,我们根据国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)评估PFS和OS。结果:IO-TKI组的中位PFS(18.6个月vs 10.1个月,p=0.008)和OS(未达到vs 34.2个月,p=0.041)均明显长于TKI组。多变量分析确定Karnofsky表现风险评分、一线治疗(iotki联合治疗或TKI单药治疗)和高c反应蛋白水平是PFS和OS的不良预后因素。IMDC有利风险患者的PFS在两组间无显著差异,但IO-TKI组IMDC中危和低危患者的PFS明显长于TKI组。两组间IMDC有利和中危患者的OS无显著差异,但IO-TKI组IMDC低危患者的OS明显延长。结论:在现实世界的临床环境中,我们证明了与TKI单药治疗相比,IO-TKI联合治疗的优势。然而,在IMDC有利患者中,PFS和OS与TKI单药治疗没有显著差异。这可能表明在为IMDC有利风险患者选择治疗方案时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
期刊最新文献
Comparing Immuno-oncology Combination Therapy With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Monotherapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Comparison of Cell-death Kinetics of Recombinant Methioninase (rMETase)-treated Cancer and Normal Cells: Only Cancer Cells Undergo Methionine-depletion Catastrophe at Low rMETase Concentrations. Circulating Pre-microRNA-488 in Blood Is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Gastric Cancer. Corrigenda. Development of a Prognostic Model for Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Using Metastatic Patterns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1