Recurrence Patterns and Long-Term Results After Curative Surgery for Patients With Breast Cancer.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16726-3
Zhen Yang, Tianhao Wu, Pengyu Chen, Luan Li, Kaiming Leng, Ruipeng Dong, Guangjun Shi
{"title":"Recurrence Patterns and Long-Term Results After Curative Surgery for Patients With Breast Cancer.","authors":"Zhen Yang, Tianhao Wu, Pengyu Chen, Luan Li, Kaiming Leng, Ruipeng Dong, Guangjun Shi","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16726-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current study aimed to examine second breast cancer (SBC) risks associated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and unilateral mastectomy among breast cancer (BC) survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled patients with diagnoses of stages I to III BC who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2019. Fine-Gray competing risk regression models were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of SBC and to evaluate the associations between clinical factors and SBC development. Poisson regression analysis was performed to assess the risk for SBC after BCS compared with mastectomy by age and latency period. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to examine survival between patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and those undergoing mastectomy for SBC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 740,349 patients, 467,480 underwent BCS, and 272,869 underwent mastectomy. The 10-year cumulative incidence of mastectomy was 3.77% for SBC and 2.11% for BCS. Compared with mastectomy, BCS was associated with a significantly higher risk of LR and a modestly elevated risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). The significant risk factors for SBC were age at initial BC diagnosis, race, marital status, year of diagnosis, tumor size, histology, molecular subtype, cancer stage, metropolitan status, type of surgery, and radiotherapy. Dynamic risk assessments showed that the relative risk of SBC after BCS versus mastectomy decreased with advancing age, but increased with longer follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This cohort study showed that BC survivors undergoing BCS have a higher risk of SBC than those undergoing mastectomy. With the ongoing evolution of surgical options, achieving optimal long-term outcomes necessitates a more comprehensive assessment that balances oncologic efficacy with patient-centered outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2554-2568"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16726-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current study aimed to examine second breast cancer (SBC) risks associated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and unilateral mastectomy among breast cancer (BC) survivors.

Methods: The study enrolled patients with diagnoses of stages I to III BC who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2019. Fine-Gray competing risk regression models were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of SBC and to evaluate the associations between clinical factors and SBC development. Poisson regression analysis was performed to assess the risk for SBC after BCS compared with mastectomy by age and latency period. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to examine survival between patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and those undergoing mastectomy for SBC.

Results: Among 740,349 patients, 467,480 underwent BCS, and 272,869 underwent mastectomy. The 10-year cumulative incidence of mastectomy was 3.77% for SBC and 2.11% for BCS. Compared with mastectomy, BCS was associated with a significantly higher risk of LR and a modestly elevated risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). The significant risk factors for SBC were age at initial BC diagnosis, race, marital status, year of diagnosis, tumor size, histology, molecular subtype, cancer stage, metropolitan status, type of surgery, and radiotherapy. Dynamic risk assessments showed that the relative risk of SBC after BCS versus mastectomy decreased with advancing age, but increased with longer follow-up periods.

Conclusions: This cohort study showed that BC survivors undergoing BCS have a higher risk of SBC than those undergoing mastectomy. With the ongoing evolution of surgical options, achieving optimal long-term outcomes necessitates a more comprehensive assessment that balances oncologic efficacy with patient-centered outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌根治性手术后的复发模式及远期疗效。
背景:本研究旨在探讨乳腺癌(BC)幸存者中保乳手术(BCS)和单侧乳房切除术相关的第二乳腺癌(SBC)风险。方法:该研究纳入了2000年至2019年期间接受手术的诊断为I至III期BC的患者。使用细灰色竞争风险回归模型来估计SBC的累积发病率,并评估临床因素与SBC发展之间的关系。通过泊松回归分析,以年龄和潜伏期来评估BCS与乳房切除术后SBC的风险。Kaplan-Meier方法用于检查保乳治疗(BCT)和乳房切除术患者的生存。结果:在740,349例患者中,467,480例接受了BCS, 272,869例接受了乳房切除术。SBC的10年累积乳房切除术发生率为3.77%,BCS为2.11%。与乳房切除术相比,BCS与LR的风险显著升高和对侧乳腺癌(CBC)的风险适度升高相关。SBC的重要危险因素有:初诊年龄、种族、婚姻状况、诊断年份、肿瘤大小、组织学、分子亚型、癌症分期、城市状况、手术类型和放疗。动态风险评估显示,BCS与乳房切除术后SBC的相对风险随着年龄的增长而降低,但随着随访时间的延长而增加。结论:这项队列研究表明,接受BCS的乳腺癌幸存者比接受乳房切除术的乳腺癌幸存者发生SBC的风险更高。随着手术选择的不断发展,实现最佳的长期结果需要更全面的评估,以平衡肿瘤疗效和以患者为中心的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Recurrence Patterns and Long-term Results After Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy, and Curative Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
IF 9 1区 医学Annals of surgeryPub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002435
Thomas Steffen, Daniel Dietrich, Annelies Schnider, Christoph Kettelhack, Olivier Huber, Walter R Marti, Markus Furrer, Beat Gloor, Marc Schiesser, Sandra Thierstein, Peter Brauchli, Thomas Ruhstaller
Long-term prognosis of patients with local recurrence after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early breast cancer
IF 8.4 1区 医学European Journal of CancerPub Date : 2005-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.040
A.C. Voogd , F.J. van Oost , E.J.T. Rutgers , P.H.M. Elkhuizen , A.N. van Geel , L.J.E.E. Scheijmans , M.J.C. van der Sangen , G. Botke , C.J. Hoekstra , J.J. Jobsen , C.J.H. van de Velde , M.F. von Meyenfeldt , J.M. Tabak , J.L. Peterse , M.J. van de Vijver , J.W.W. Coebergh , G. van Tienhoven , for the Dutch Study Group on Local Recurrence after Breast Conservation (BORST Group)
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
期刊最新文献
ASO Visual Abstract: Are Positive Biopsy Margins in Melanoma Significant? A Cohort Study of Micro- Versus Macroscopic Margin Status and Their Impact on Residual Disease and Survival. ASO Visual Abstract: Negative Impact of Systemic Therapy on Survival in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Low-Grade Metastatic Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma. ASO Visual Abstract: Effect of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy on Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy for Gastric Cancer. ASO Visual Abstract: Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces Predicts Survival in Resected Pulmonary Lymphoepithelial Carcinoma. ASO Visual Abstract: Impact of Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing with Expanded Eligibility for Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients in a Large Integrated Health System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1