Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results.

Q4 Medicine Immunohematology Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Print Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.2478/immunohematology-2024-022
Crystal Theiler, Christine Lomas-Francis, Sunitha Vege, Marie-Claire Chevrier, Gabriel André Leiva-Torres, Margaret A Keller, Katherine Kaherl, Trina Coppolino, Susan T Johnson
{"title":"Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results.","authors":"Crystal Theiler, Christine Lomas-Francis, Sunitha Vege, Marie-Claire Chevrier, Gabriel André Leiva-Torres, Margaret A Keller, Katherine Kaherl, Trina Coppolino, Susan T Johnson","doi":"10.2478/immunohematology-2024-022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Variant D antigens can cause variable serologic results when typing with Anti-D reagents. There is limited information regarding the ability of Anti-D reagents to differentiate between D variants defined by <i>RHD</i> genotyping. This study was performed to determine if a panel of 20 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-licensed Anti-D reagents can identify molecularly defined D variants. Red blood cells from 119 donors carrying variant <i>RHD</i> alleles were tested at immediate spin (IS) and/or by the indirect antiglobuin test (IAT) using conventional test tube and/or column agglutination technology. Reaction strength at IS and IAT was reviewed to determine whether a pattern of reactivity could be correlated with a specific D variant. Agglutination results from each sample with each Anti-D reagent were combined to assess overall reactivity. The sample set consisted of 21 D variants, based on prior <i>RHD</i> genotyping. Of these variants, nine categories had three or more samples used for analysis (<i>N</i> = 102); 25 <i>RHD*01W.1,</i> 15 <i>RHD*01W.2,</i> 14 <i>RHD*01W.3,</i> 17 <i>RHD*09.01,</i> 14 <i>RHD*09.03,</i> 4 <i>RHD*01W.4,</i> 23 <i>RHD*07,</i> 4 <i>RHD*10.05,</i> and 6 reference allele <i>RHD*01.</i> As expected, IS showed more negative or weak reactions, and IAT produced more positive reactions with 3+/4+ agglutination strength. <i>RHD*01W.3</i> samples showed strongest reactivity at IS and IAT. Greatest variation in reactivity was observed with <i>RHD*01W.2,</i> showing weakest overall reactivity at IS. All weak D types had at least one sample that yielded a negative result and one sample with 4+ agglutination at IS. Although there were general patterns of reactivity for each variant tested, no one pattern defined all samples carrying the same <i>RHD</i> allele. This study demonstrated that even with 20 different Anti-D reagents, serologic testing alone is insufficient to define weak or partial D types, characterize the risk for alloanti-D, or determine candidacy for Rh immune globulin. The results illustrate how multiple Anti-D reagents can be used to identify samples that should be reflexed to molecular testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"40 4","pages":"159-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2024-022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variant D antigens can cause variable serologic results when typing with Anti-D reagents. There is limited information regarding the ability of Anti-D reagents to differentiate between D variants defined by RHD genotyping. This study was performed to determine if a panel of 20 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-licensed Anti-D reagents can identify molecularly defined D variants. Red blood cells from 119 donors carrying variant RHD alleles were tested at immediate spin (IS) and/or by the indirect antiglobuin test (IAT) using conventional test tube and/or column agglutination technology. Reaction strength at IS and IAT was reviewed to determine whether a pattern of reactivity could be correlated with a specific D variant. Agglutination results from each sample with each Anti-D reagent were combined to assess overall reactivity. The sample set consisted of 21 D variants, based on prior RHD genotyping. Of these variants, nine categories had three or more samples used for analysis (N = 102); 25 RHD*01W.1, 15 RHD*01W.2, 14 RHD*01W.3, 17 RHD*09.01, 14 RHD*09.03, 4 RHD*01W.4, 23 RHD*07, 4 RHD*10.05, and 6 reference allele RHD*01. As expected, IS showed more negative or weak reactions, and IAT produced more positive reactions with 3+/4+ agglutination strength. RHD*01W.3 samples showed strongest reactivity at IS and IAT. Greatest variation in reactivity was observed with RHD*01W.2, showing weakest overall reactivity at IS. All weak D types had at least one sample that yielded a negative result and one sample with 4+ agglutination at IS. Although there were general patterns of reactivity for each variant tested, no one pattern defined all samples carrying the same RHD allele. This study demonstrated that even with 20 different Anti-D reagents, serologic testing alone is insufficient to define weak or partial D types, characterize the risk for alloanti-D, or determine candidacy for Rh immune globulin. The results illustrate how multiple Anti-D reagents can be used to identify samples that should be reflexed to molecular testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弱和部分D表型:分子和血清学结果的比较研究。
当用抗-D试剂分型时,不同的D抗原可引起不同的血清学结果。关于抗-D试剂区分由RHD基因分型定义的D变体的能力的信息有限。这项研究是为了确定20种美国食品和药物管理局许可的抗D试剂是否可以识别分子定义的D变体。采用常规试管和/或柱凝集技术,对携带变异RHD等位基因的119名献血者的红细胞进行即时自旋(IS)和/或间接抗球蛋白试验(IAT)检测。对IS和IAT的反应强度进行了回顾,以确定反应性模式是否与特定的D变体相关。每个样品与每种Anti-D试剂的凝集结果合并评估总体反应性。根据先前的RHD基因分型,样本集包括21个D变体。在这些变体中,9个类别有3个或更多的样本用于分析(N = 102);25 RHD * 01 w。1,15 rhd * 01w。2,14 rhd * 01w。3、17 rhd *09.01, 14 rhd *09.03, 4 rhd * 01w。4,23个RHD*07, 4个RHD*10.05, 6个参考等位基因RHD*01。正如预期的那样,IS的凝集反应多为阴性或弱反应,而IAT的凝集反应多为3+/4+的阳性反应。RHD * 01 w。3个样品在IS和IAT反应性最强。RHD*01W的反应性变化最大。2,整体反应性在IS处最弱。所有弱D型至少有一个样品产生阴性结果,一个样品在IS上有4+凝集。虽然每个测试的变异都有一般的反应模式,但没有一种模式定义所有携带相同RHD等位基因的样本。该研究表明,即使使用20种不同的抗-D试剂,单独的血清学检测也不足以确定弱或部分D型,表征异体抗-D的风险,或确定Rh免疫球蛋白的候选性。结果说明了如何使用多种Anti-D试剂来识别应该反射到分子测试的样品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Immunohematology
Immunohematology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results. Contents. Hemolysis due to anti-IH in a patient with beta-thalassemia and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. To contributors to the 2024 issues. A case of assisted reproductive technology-induced maternal alloimmunization: an emerging sensitizing factor to consider?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1