The management of splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis: a global DELPHI consensus study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hpb Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.002
Michael Scott , Mudassar Ghazanfar , John Windsor , George Ramsay , Mohamed Bekheit
{"title":"The management of splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis: a global DELPHI consensus study","authors":"Michael Scott ,&nbsp;Mudassar Ghazanfar ,&nbsp;John Windsor ,&nbsp;George Ramsay ,&nbsp;Mohamed Bekheit","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT) occurs in 17%–23 % of acute pancreatitis cases. Serious sequelae include hepatic and bowel ischaemia. However, management with therapeutic anticoagulation remains controversial due to potential bleeding risk. We aim to determine the level of consensus on prognosis, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of SpVT through a DELPHI process.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using purposive, non-probability sampling and DELPHI methodology, 173 clinicians with experience of SpVT in acute pancreatitis were approached. From April 2022 to April 2023, a three-round DELPHI process was implemented to completion. A total of 88 statements were posed for ranking via a four-point Likert scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean acute pancreatitis caseload per respondent per year was 68·0, 72·6 and 73·0 for DELPHI rounds 1,2 and 3 respectively. For SpVT anatomical location, there was strong consensus favouring anticoagulation for portal vein (89·1 %) and SMV thrombosis (90·9 %), and no consensus to treat splenic vein thrombosis (47·3 %). 74·1 % rejected radiological resolution as a definitive anticoagulation endpoint. Majority consensus favoured death, bleeding risk, bowel or liver ischaemia, hospital admission length and ITU admission as significant outcomes for experimental research design.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There was significant consensus for anticoagulation treatment of SpVT of the portal and superior mesenteric veins, especially with complete occlusion by thrombosis. Randomised controlled trials are required to grade management recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 3","pages":"Pages 343-351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X24024328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT) occurs in 17%–23 % of acute pancreatitis cases. Serious sequelae include hepatic and bowel ischaemia. However, management with therapeutic anticoagulation remains controversial due to potential bleeding risk. We aim to determine the level of consensus on prognosis, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of SpVT through a DELPHI process.

Methods

Using purposive, non-probability sampling and DELPHI methodology, 173 clinicians with experience of SpVT in acute pancreatitis were approached. From April 2022 to April 2023, a three-round DELPHI process was implemented to completion. A total of 88 statements were posed for ranking via a four-point Likert scale.

Results

The mean acute pancreatitis caseload per respondent per year was 68·0, 72·6 and 73·0 for DELPHI rounds 1,2 and 3 respectively. For SpVT anatomical location, there was strong consensus favouring anticoagulation for portal vein (89·1 %) and SMV thrombosis (90·9 %), and no consensus to treat splenic vein thrombosis (47·3 %). 74·1 % rejected radiological resolution as a definitive anticoagulation endpoint. Majority consensus favoured death, bleeding risk, bowel or liver ischaemia, hospital admission length and ITU admission as significant outcomes for experimental research design.

Conclusion

There was significant consensus for anticoagulation treatment of SpVT of the portal and superior mesenteric veins, especially with complete occlusion by thrombosis. Randomised controlled trials are required to grade management recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性胰腺炎内脏静脉血栓形成的处理:一项全球DELPHI共识研究。
背景:17%- 23%的急性胰腺炎病例发生内脏静脉血栓形成。严重的后遗症包括肝和肠缺血。然而,由于潜在的出血风险,治疗性抗凝治疗仍然存在争议。我们的目的是通过德尔菲过程确定对SpVT的预后、诊断、管理和结果的共识水平。方法:采用目的性、非概率抽样和德尔菲法,对173名有急性胰腺炎SpVT治疗经验的临床医生进行访谈。从2022年4月到2023年4月,实施了三轮DELPHI过程直至完成。共有88个陈述通过4分李克特量表进行排名。结果:在DELPHI第1轮、第2轮和第3轮中,每位应答者每年平均急性胰腺炎病例数分别为68.0、72.6和73.0。对于SpVT的解剖位置,赞成门静脉抗凝(89.1%)和SMV血栓形成(90.9%)的意见强烈,赞成脾静脉血栓形成的意见不一致(47.3%)。74.1%的患者拒绝将放射学分辨率作为明确的抗凝终点。多数共识赞成将死亡、出血风险、肠或肝缺血、住院时间和国际电联入院作为实验研究设计的重要结果。结论:门静脉和肠系膜上静脉SpVT的抗凝治疗有重要的共识,特别是血栓形成完全闭塞。对管理建议进行分级需要随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hpb
Hpb GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication. Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice. Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice. HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields. Abstracted and Indexed in: MEDLINE® EMBASE PubMed Science Citation Index Expanded Academic Search (EBSCO) HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).
期刊最新文献
Conference Calendar Contents Percutaneous hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines in treatment-resistant colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study ChatGPT vs. surgeons on pancreatic cancer queries: accuracy & empathy evaluated by patients and experts Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for genetic analysis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1