Self-reported chronic rhinosinusitis diagnoses and symptoms in World Trade Center-exposed and non-World Trade Center-exposed United States firefighters

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Preventive medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108216
Ankura Singh , Rachel Zeig-Owens , Mayris P. Webber , Alexandra K. Mueller , David J. Prezant
{"title":"Self-reported chronic rhinosinusitis diagnoses and symptoms in World Trade Center-exposed and non-World Trade Center-exposed United States firefighters","authors":"Ankura Singh ,&nbsp;Rachel Zeig-Owens ,&nbsp;Mayris P. Webber ,&nbsp;Alexandra K. Mueller ,&nbsp;David J. Prezant","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Greater World Trade Center (WTC) exposure levels have been associated with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) diagnoses and symptoms. We aimed to determine whether self-reported CRS is elevated in WTC-exposed Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY) firefighters when compared with non-WTC-exposed/non-FDNY firefighters and with the general population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included male WTC-exposed (<em>N</em> = 7840) and non-WTC-exposed (<em>N</em> = 2771) firefighters who were employed on 9/11/2001 and later completed a health survey. Self-reported CRS diagnoses and symptoms were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses estimated the odds of self-reported ever CRS diagnosis and current symptoms in WTC-exposed vs. non-WTC-exposed firefighters. Additional analyses compared self-reported current CRS diagnoses in firefighters vs. American males. Models were adjusted for demographics, smoking, and BMI.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-one percent of WTC-exposed firefighters reported ever having a CRS diagnosis vs. 20 % of non-WTC-exposed firefighters (adjusted-OR = 3.84, 95 % CI = 3.44–4.28). WTC-exposure was also associated with specific rhinosinusitis symptoms, including nasal/sinus congestion (adjusted-OR = 1.17, 95 % CI = 1.06–1.29), nose irritation (adjusted-OR = 1.48, 95 % CI = 1.24–1.76), and sinus pain/pressure (adjusted-OR = 1.42, 95 % CI = 1.26–1.60). Both WTC-exposed (adjusted-OR = 3.84, 95 % CI = 3.46–4.27) and non-WTC-exposed firefighters (adjusted-OR = 1.97, 95 % CI = 1.71–2.27) were more likely to report a current CRS diagnosis than similar adult males.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>WTC-exposure was associated with self-reported CRS diagnoses and symptoms in firefighters. Higher CRS diagnosis prevalence in the WTC-exposed cohort could be a result of exposure to irritants present at the WTC site, and may also be explained, in part, by the enhanced surveillance and healthcare WTC-exposed firefighters receive via the WTC Health Program. Elevated levels of CRS in firefighters overall could be due to routine, non-WTC-related firefighting exposures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 108216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524003712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Greater World Trade Center (WTC) exposure levels have been associated with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) diagnoses and symptoms. We aimed to determine whether self-reported CRS is elevated in WTC-exposed Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY) firefighters when compared with non-WTC-exposed/non-FDNY firefighters and with the general population.

Methods

The study included male WTC-exposed (N = 7840) and non-WTC-exposed (N = 2771) firefighters who were employed on 9/11/2001 and later completed a health survey. Self-reported CRS diagnoses and symptoms were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses estimated the odds of self-reported ever CRS diagnosis and current symptoms in WTC-exposed vs. non-WTC-exposed firefighters. Additional analyses compared self-reported current CRS diagnoses in firefighters vs. American males. Models were adjusted for demographics, smoking, and BMI.

Results

Fifty-one percent of WTC-exposed firefighters reported ever having a CRS diagnosis vs. 20 % of non-WTC-exposed firefighters (adjusted-OR = 3.84, 95 % CI = 3.44–4.28). WTC-exposure was also associated with specific rhinosinusitis symptoms, including nasal/sinus congestion (adjusted-OR = 1.17, 95 % CI = 1.06–1.29), nose irritation (adjusted-OR = 1.48, 95 % CI = 1.24–1.76), and sinus pain/pressure (adjusted-OR = 1.42, 95 % CI = 1.26–1.60). Both WTC-exposed (adjusted-OR = 3.84, 95 % CI = 3.46–4.27) and non-WTC-exposed firefighters (adjusted-OR = 1.97, 95 % CI = 1.71–2.27) were more likely to report a current CRS diagnosis than similar adult males.

Conclusions

WTC-exposure was associated with self-reported CRS diagnoses and symptoms in firefighters. Higher CRS diagnosis prevalence in the WTC-exposed cohort could be a result of exposure to irritants present at the WTC site, and may also be explained, in part, by the enhanced surveillance and healthcare WTC-exposed firefighters receive via the WTC Health Program. Elevated levels of CRS in firefighters overall could be due to routine, non-WTC-related firefighting exposures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世界贸易中心暴露和非世界贸易中心暴露的美国消防员自我报告的慢性鼻窦炎诊断和症状
背景:大世界贸易中心(WTC)暴露水平与慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的诊断和症状有关。我们的目的是确定wtc暴露的纽约市消防局(FDNY)消防员与非wtc暴露/非FDNY消防员和一般人群相比,自我报告的CRS是否升高。方法:研究对象为2001年9月11日入职的接触wtc的男性消防员(N = 7840)和未接触wtc的男性消防员(N = 2771)。自我报告的CRS诊断和症状进行评估。多变量logistic回归分析估计了wtc暴露与非wtc暴露消防员自我报告的CRS诊断和当前症状的几率。另外的分析比较了消防员和美国男性自我报告的当前CRS诊断。模型根据人口统计、吸烟和体重指数进行了调整。结果:51%的暴露于wtc的消防员报告曾有过CRS诊断,而20%的未暴露于wtc的消防员报告曾有过CRS诊断(调整后or = 3.84,95% %CI = 3.44-4.28)。WTC-exposure也与特定鼻窦炎症状,包括鼻/鼻腔充血(调整或 = 1.17,95 CI  % = 1.06 - -1.29),鼻子过敏(调整或 = 1.48,95 CI  % = 1.24 - -1.76),和鼻窦疼痛/压力(调整或 = 1.42,95 CI  % = 1.26 - -1.60)。WTC-exposed(调整或 = 3.84,95 CI  % = 3.46 - -4.27)和non-WTC-exposed消防员(调整或 = 1.97,95 CI  % = 1.71 - -2.27)更有可能报告当前CRS诊断比类似的成年男性。结论:wtc暴露与消防员自我报告的CRS诊断和症状有关。在世贸中心暴露人群中,较高的CRS诊断患病率可能是世贸中心现场暴露于刺激物的结果,也可能部分解释为世贸中心健康计划加强了对世贸中心暴露消防员的监测和医疗保健。消防员CRS水平的升高可能是由于常规的、与世贸中心无关的消防暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "The impact of computer use on myopia development in childhood: The Generation R study" [Preventive Medicine, Volume 132, 2020, 105988]. Commentary: Determinants of physical activity among African immigrants in the US and the consideration of the education-occupation mismatch Editorial Board Physical activity and executive functions in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chronicled: 2 years' evolution at Preventive Medicine and Preventive Medicine Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1