Short-term outcomes of vessel-oriented D2 and D3 lymph node dissection for sigmoid colon cancer.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques in Coloproctology Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1007/s10151-024-03077-0
S K Efetov, G Tomasicchio, C Kayaalp, A Rychkova, L Vincenti, A Dezi, A Picciariello
{"title":"Short-term outcomes of vessel-oriented D2 and D3 lymph node dissection for sigmoid colon cancer.","authors":"S K Efetov, G Tomasicchio, C Kayaalp, A Rychkova, L Vincenti, A Dezi, A Picciariello","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03077-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Level of lymph nodes dissection (LND) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation is still matter of debate of radical resection of colorectal cancer. This study aims to compare the short-term outcome of three different surgical techniques to treat sigmoid cancer: low ligation (LL) of the IMA with D3-LND, low IMA ligation with D2-LND, and high ligation (HL) of the IMA with D3-LND.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients affected by sigmoid colon cancer, who underwent radical resection with three different techniques (LL and D3-LND Group A, HL and D3-LND Group B, and LL with D2 LND- Group C), were included. Operative time (min), blood loss (ml), early postoperative complications, and number of harvested lymph nodes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients per group were enrolled. The median operation time was shorter in group C (130 min, interquartile range [IQR] 120-140), compared with the 245 min (IQR 193.8-295.5) of group A and 257 min (IQR 183-345) of group B, p < 0.005. No significant differences between A and B group were observed in the median intraoperative blood loss, while group C had higher intraoperative blood loss (200 ml, IQR 200-260, p = 0.002). Anastomotic leak occurred in three patients belonging to group B. A reduced number of harvested lymph nodes was registered in Group C (14 lymph nodes, IQR 10-17), p < 0.005.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both high and low tie ligation with D3-LND for sigmoid cancer can be considered safe and feasible with low rate of postoperative complications, allowing a higher number of harvested lymph nodes compared to low tie ligation with D2 lymphadenectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03077-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Level of lymph nodes dissection (LND) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation is still matter of debate of radical resection of colorectal cancer. This study aims to compare the short-term outcome of three different surgical techniques to treat sigmoid cancer: low ligation (LL) of the IMA with D3-LND, low IMA ligation with D2-LND, and high ligation (HL) of the IMA with D3-LND.

Methods: Patients affected by sigmoid colon cancer, who underwent radical resection with three different techniques (LL and D3-LND Group A, HL and D3-LND Group B, and LL with D2 LND- Group C), were included. Operative time (min), blood loss (ml), early postoperative complications, and number of harvested lymph nodes were compared.

Results: Thirty patients per group were enrolled. The median operation time was shorter in group C (130 min, interquartile range [IQR] 120-140), compared with the 245 min (IQR 193.8-295.5) of group A and 257 min (IQR 183-345) of group B, p < 0.005. No significant differences between A and B group were observed in the median intraoperative blood loss, while group C had higher intraoperative blood loss (200 ml, IQR 200-260, p = 0.002). Anastomotic leak occurred in three patients belonging to group B. A reduced number of harvested lymph nodes was registered in Group C (14 lymph nodes, IQR 10-17), p < 0.005.

Conclusions: Both high and low tie ligation with D3-LND for sigmoid cancer can be considered safe and feasible with low rate of postoperative complications, allowing a higher number of harvested lymph nodes compared to low tie ligation with D2 lymphadenectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乙状结肠血管导向的D2和D3淋巴结清扫术的近期疗效。
背景:淋巴结清扫(LND)水平和肠系膜下动脉(IMA)结扎是大肠癌根治术中争论不休的问题。本研究旨在比较三种不同手术技术治疗乙状结肠癌的短期疗效:IMA低结扎(LL)与D3-LND, IMA低结扎(D2-LND)和IMA高结扎(HL)与D3-LND。方法:选取乙状结肠直肠癌患者,采用三种不同的技术(LL + D3-LND组A, HL + D3-LND组B, LL + D2 -LND组C)行根治性切除术。比较手术时间(min)、出血量(ml)、术后早期并发症及淋巴结清扫数。结果:每组30例患者入组。C组的中位手术时间(130 min,四分位间距[IQR] 120 ~ 140)短于A组的245 min (IQR 193.8 ~ 295.5)和B组的257 min (IQR 183 ~ 345)。p结论:D3-LND高、低结扎治疗乙状结肠癌均是安全可行的,术后并发症发生率低,比低结扎D2淋巴结切除术可获得更多的淋巴结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
期刊最新文献
Extended versus limited mesenteric excision in bowel resection for Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review. To cut or not to cut? Extended mesenteric excision during intestinal resection does not impact the postoperative recurrence nor the postoperative complications in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. First report of full colon transplantation as part of a visceral allograft. High and low take-off external prolapse phenotypes can be characterised preoperatively on defaecation proctography. Pain, opioid consumption, and epidural anesthesia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing laparoscopic subtotal colectomy: an observational cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1