Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the hand assessment tool (HAT-Sp) in Spain.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103250
María Visitación Martínez-Fernández, Carmen María Sarabia-Cobo, Nuria Sánchez-Labraca
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the hand assessment tool (HAT-Sp) in Spain.","authors":"María Visitación Martínez-Fernández, Carmen María Sarabia-Cobo, Nuria Sánchez-Labraca","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The HAT is a questionnaire designed to measure activity limitations in patients with hand and wrist injuries, without assistance. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the psychometric properties of the HAT-validity, reliability, and responsiveness-for different hand conditions in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cultural adaptation followed recommendations from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Validation adhered to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines and involved 262 hand patients. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,1), for test-retest reliability, the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest detectable change (SDC) were used to assess measurement error. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and construct validity using Pearson's correlation coefficient evaluated validity. Responsiveness was measured using effect size (ES) and standardised response mean (SRM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adaptation process showed no significant changes, with strong expert agreement (Kendall's W = 0.81, p < 0.001) and patient difficulty below 15%. Reliability was confirmed with an excellent Cronbach's alpha of 0.91, ICC values of 0.99, and low measurement error (SEM of 0.72 and SDC of 1.41). CFA showed a good model fit (RMSEA of 0.04, SRMR of 0.05). HAT showed a high correlation with DASH (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and a weak correlation with EQ-5D (r = -0.07, p > 0.05). Responsiveness, assessed in 222 patients, yielded a moderate ES of -0.62 and an SRM of -0.72.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HAT-Sp is a well-adapted and widely accepted tool among both Spanish patients and experts. The study demonstrated its strong reliability, validity, and responsiveness in activity limitation without assistance in patients with various hand and wrist injuries following physiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"75 ","pages":"103250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The HAT is a questionnaire designed to measure activity limitations in patients with hand and wrist injuries, without assistance. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the psychometric properties of the HAT-validity, reliability, and responsiveness-for different hand conditions in Spain.

Methods: Cultural adaptation followed recommendations from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Validation adhered to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines and involved 262 hand patients. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,1), for test-retest reliability, the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest detectable change (SDC) were used to assess measurement error. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and construct validity using Pearson's correlation coefficient evaluated validity. Responsiveness was measured using effect size (ES) and standardised response mean (SRM).

Results: The adaptation process showed no significant changes, with strong expert agreement (Kendall's W = 0.81, p < 0.001) and patient difficulty below 15%. Reliability was confirmed with an excellent Cronbach's alpha of 0.91, ICC values of 0.99, and low measurement error (SEM of 0.72 and SDC of 1.41). CFA showed a good model fit (RMSEA of 0.04, SRMR of 0.05). HAT showed a high correlation with DASH (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and a weak correlation with EQ-5D (r = -0.07, p > 0.05). Responsiveness, assessed in 222 patients, yielded a moderate ES of -0.62 and an SRM of -0.72.

Conclusions: The HAT-Sp is a well-adapted and widely accepted tool among both Spanish patients and experts. The study demonstrated its strong reliability, validity, and responsiveness in activity limitation without assistance in patients with various hand and wrist injuries following physiotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙手部评估工具(HAT-Sp)的跨文化适应、信度、效度和反应性。
目的:HAT是一份问卷,旨在测量手和手腕损伤患者在没有辅助的情况下的活动限制。本研究旨在翻译,文化适应,并验证西班牙不同手条件下hat的心理测量特性-效度,信度和反应性。方法:文化适应遵循美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)的建议。验证遵循基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)指南,涉及262名手部患者。信度采用Cronbach’s alpha和类内相关系数(ICC)(2,1)评估,重测信度采用测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(SDC)评估测量误差。验证性因子分析(CFA)和建构效度采用Pearson相关系数评估效度。反应性采用效应量(ES)和标准化反应均值(SRM)测量。结果:适应过程无明显变化,专家一致(Kendall’s W = 0.81, p 0.05)。222例患者的反应性评估结果显示,中度ES为-0.62,SRM为-0.72。结论:HAT-Sp在西班牙患者和专家中是一种适应性良好且被广泛接受的工具。该研究证明了其在无辅助活动限制的情况下对各种手部和腕部损伤患者进行物理治疗的强信度、效度和反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
期刊最新文献
Sensorimotor control and neurocognitive performance in musculoskeletal disease and injury control. IFOMPT's Educational Standards and International Monitoring: A member survey and review. The prognostic reasoning by physiotherapists of musculoskeletal disorders: A phenomenological exploratory study. Validity and reliability of the Danish version of the Short Form Brief Pain Inventory. Do patients with fibromyalgia syndrome receive updated management strategies? A web-based survey among Italian physiotherapists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1