Evaluation of Zhuhai DL Biotech's BT24 automated blood culture system.

Blanca Carrasco, Elena Hidalgo, Gloria Zaragoza, Juan-Ignacio Alós
{"title":"Evaluation of Zhuhai DL Biotech's BT24 automated blood culture system.","authors":"Blanca Carrasco, Elena Hidalgo, Gloria Zaragoza, Juan-Ignacio Alós","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For the microbiological diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia, it is essential to use automated blood culture systems that guarantee good performance in the detection of microorganisms. We evaluated the BT24 system for blood cultures by comparing it with the BACTEC™ FX system in detection of positive spiked blood cultures (BC) and bottles, subsequent growth of the microorganism, and time to detection (TTD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The parallel analysis of both systems was performed with 160 strains of 31 different species, each inoculated under the same conditions and simultaneously in six blood culture bottles. The Chi-square test was used for comparison per BC and per bottle detection. Wilconxon test and Student's t-test were used for comparison of TTDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the following BC (aerobic bottle+anaerobic bottle) were detected as positive: 160/160 (100%) in BACTEC FX and 158/160 (98.7%) in BT24 (P=.31). Furthermore, the following pediatric blood cultures (1 single bottle, aerobic) were also detected: 159/160 (99.4%) in BACTEC FX and 156/160 (97.5%) in BT24 (P=.17). TTDs were longer with BT24 system than with BACTEC FX system, especially for Staphylococcus aureus strains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We consider the BT24 system with good performance and specificity comparable to the reference system, but inferior in TTD.</p>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2024.07.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: For the microbiological diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia, it is essential to use automated blood culture systems that guarantee good performance in the detection of microorganisms. We evaluated the BT24 system for blood cultures by comparing it with the BACTEC™ FX system in detection of positive spiked blood cultures (BC) and bottles, subsequent growth of the microorganism, and time to detection (TTD).

Methods: The parallel analysis of both systems was performed with 160 strains of 31 different species, each inoculated under the same conditions and simultaneously in six blood culture bottles. The Chi-square test was used for comparison per BC and per bottle detection. Wilconxon test and Student's t-test were used for comparison of TTDs.

Results: Overall, the following BC (aerobic bottle+anaerobic bottle) were detected as positive: 160/160 (100%) in BACTEC FX and 158/160 (98.7%) in BT24 (P=.31). Furthermore, the following pediatric blood cultures (1 single bottle, aerobic) were also detected: 159/160 (99.4%) in BACTEC FX and 156/160 (97.5%) in BT24 (P=.17). TTDs were longer with BT24 system than with BACTEC FX system, especially for Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Conclusions: We consider the BT24 system with good performance and specificity comparable to the reference system, but inferior in TTD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
珠海DL生物技术公司BT24全自动血液培养系统的评价。
导读:对于菌血症和真菌血症的微生物诊断,必须使用自动化血液培养系统,以保证良好的微生物检测性能。我们通过将BT24系统与BACTEC™FX系统在检测阳性加标血培养物(BC)和瓶子、微生物的后续生长和检测时间(TTD)方面进行比较,评估BT24系统的血培养效果。方法:将31个不同菌种160株在相同条件下同时接种于6个血培养瓶中,对两种体系进行平行分析。卡方检验用于比较每个BC和每个瓶检测。tds的比较采用Wilconxon检验和Student’st检验。结果:总体而言,以下BC(好氧瓶+厌氧瓶)检测为阳性:BACTEC FX为160/160 (100%),BT24为158/160 (98.7%)(P= 0.31)。此外,以下儿童血培养(1单瓶,需氧)也被检测到:BACTEC FX为159/160 (99.4%),BT24为156/160 (97.5%)(P= 0.17)。BT24系统的TTDs比BACTEC FX系统的TTDs更长,特别是金黄色葡萄球菌菌株。结论:我们认为BT24系统具有与参考系统相当的良好性能和特异性,但在TTD方面较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ghost fly attacks unseen. Fever and skin lesions in a patient undergoing chemotherapy. Impact of the passive immunization campaign with nirsevimab in 2023-24 in Castellón. Final results. Infection by Saksenaea vasiformis in Spain: Case report and literature review. Neonatal pneumonia with poor evolution: An unsuspected agent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1