Do Medicare Beneficiaries Under Accountable Care or Medicare Advantage Use Lower Quality Nursing Homes?

Huiying Wang, Cyrus Kosar, Momotazur Rahman, Vince Mor
{"title":"Do Medicare Beneficiaries Under Accountable Care or Medicare Advantage Use Lower Quality Nursing Homes?","authors":"Huiying Wang, Cyrus Kosar, Momotazur Rahman, Vince Mor","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the growing number of Medicare beneficiaries attributed to Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) or enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) and their financial incentives to lower the cost of the cared patients, it is essential to understand how these alternative payment models affect post-acute outcomes among beneficiaries, with or without dementia diagnoses. In this study, we examined the quality of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) that beneficiaries entered after hospital discharge under different payment models.</p><p><strong>Study participants: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries who were discharged from hospitals and admitted to SNFs between 2013 and 2018.</p><p><strong>Key measures: </strong>The exposure variable was a payment indicator, including ACO, MA, or non-ACO traditional Medicare (TM) fee-for-service. The dependent variable was high overall quality SNF, defined as with at least 4-star rating in the CMS Nursing Home Care Compare.</p><p><strong>Analytic plan: </strong>We examined the payer distribution by dementia diagnosis using ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) fixed effects and adjusted for age, gender, and race. We also estimated the probabilities of entering high-quality SNF as a function of payer status and dementia diagnosis each year using hospital and ZCTA fixed effects and accounting for beneficiary-level covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among SNF admissions from 2013 to 2018, the share of ACO-attributed beneficiaries increased from 7.6% to 20.2%, MA enrollees increased from 25.2% to 32.8%, and non-ACO-attributed TM enrollees decreased from 67.2% to 47.3%. Consistently, ACO-attributed beneficiaries were the most likely, while MA enrollees were the least likely to enter high-quality SNFs, regardless of dementia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight significant differences in access to high-quality SNFs across Medicare payment models, with ACO-attributed beneficiaries consistently experiencing better access than their MA or traditional Medicare counterparts, regardless of dementia diagnosis. These results underscore the need for further investigation into how payment models influence care quality and access, particularly for vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the growing number of Medicare beneficiaries attributed to Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) or enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) and their financial incentives to lower the cost of the cared patients, it is essential to understand how these alternative payment models affect post-acute outcomes among beneficiaries, with or without dementia diagnoses. In this study, we examined the quality of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) that beneficiaries entered after hospital discharge under different payment models.

Study participants: Medicare beneficiaries who were discharged from hospitals and admitted to SNFs between 2013 and 2018.

Key measures: The exposure variable was a payment indicator, including ACO, MA, or non-ACO traditional Medicare (TM) fee-for-service. The dependent variable was high overall quality SNF, defined as with at least 4-star rating in the CMS Nursing Home Care Compare.

Analytic plan: We examined the payer distribution by dementia diagnosis using ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) fixed effects and adjusted for age, gender, and race. We also estimated the probabilities of entering high-quality SNF as a function of payer status and dementia diagnosis each year using hospital and ZCTA fixed effects and accounting for beneficiary-level covariates.

Results: Among SNF admissions from 2013 to 2018, the share of ACO-attributed beneficiaries increased from 7.6% to 20.2%, MA enrollees increased from 25.2% to 32.8%, and non-ACO-attributed TM enrollees decreased from 67.2% to 47.3%. Consistently, ACO-attributed beneficiaries were the most likely, while MA enrollees were the least likely to enter high-quality SNFs, regardless of dementia diagnosis.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight significant differences in access to high-quality SNFs across Medicare payment models, with ACO-attributed beneficiaries consistently experiencing better access than their MA or traditional Medicare counterparts, regardless of dementia diagnosis. These results underscore the need for further investigation into how payment models influence care quality and access, particularly for vulnerable populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保险受益人在责任医疗或医疗保险优势下使用质量较差的养老院吗?
背景:随着越来越多的医疗保险受益人归属于问责医疗组织(ACO)或参加医疗保险优势(MA),以及他们降低护理患者成本的财务激励,了解这些替代支付模式如何影响受益人的急性后预后是至关重要的,无论是否患有痴呆症诊断。在本研究中,我们考察了受益人在不同支付模式下出院后进入的熟练护理机构(snf)的质量。研究参与者:2013年至2018年间从医院出院并入住snf的医疗保险受益人。关键指标:暴露变量是一个支付指标,包括ACO、MA或非ACO传统医疗保险(TM)按服务收费。因变量是高整体质量SNF,定义为在CMS养老院护理比较中至少有4星评级。分析方案:我们采用邮政编码制表区域(ZCTAs)固定效应,并根据年龄、性别和种族进行调整,通过痴呆诊断检查支付款人分布。我们还使用医院和ZCTA固定效应,并考虑受益人水平协变量,估计了进入高质量SNF的概率,作为每年付款人状态和痴呆诊断的函数。结果:在2013年至2018年的SNF入学人数中,aco归因于受益人的比例从7.6%增加到20.2%,MA参选者从25.2%增加到32.8%,非aco归因于TM参选者从67.2%下降到47.3%。一致地,aco归因于受益人的可能性最大,而MA入选者最不可能进入高质量snf,无论痴呆症诊断如何。结论:我们的研究结果突出了不同医疗保险支付模式在获得高质量snf方面的显着差异,无论痴呆症诊断如何,aco归因于受益人始终比MA或传统医疗保险受益人获得更好的机会。这些结果强调需要进一步调查支付模式如何影响护理质量和获取,特别是对弱势群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Comment on: "Neuropsychiatric Presentations of Common Dementia Syndromes: A Concise Review for Primary Care Team Members". Nonpharmacological Pain Management for People With Dementia: A Scoping Review Mapping Research Gaps From a Pragmatic Lens. Reply to: Comment on: Neuropsychiatric Presentations of Common Dementia Syndromes: A Concise Review for Primary Care Team Members. A Pause. Fathers and Sons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1