Nonpharmacological Pain Management for People With Dementia: A Scoping Review Mapping Research Gaps From a Pragmatic Lens

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19418
Annalisa Na, Justine S. Sefcik, Laura N. Gitlin
{"title":"Nonpharmacological Pain Management for People With Dementia: A Scoping Review Mapping Research Gaps From a Pragmatic Lens","authors":"Annalisa Na,&nbsp;Justine S. Sefcik,&nbsp;Laura N. Gitlin","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Nonpharmacological pain interventions are effective but underutilized in people living with dementia (PLWD). Leveraging an implementation lens (i.e., the Readiness Assessment for Pragmatic Trials [RAPT] model) to scope the literature may reveal research gaps contributing to this underutilization. The purpose of this scoping review is to summarize the literature, map the studies to the RAPT model, and identify research gaps.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA- ScR) guidelines, two reviewers screened, collated, extracted, and mapped data from eligible studies to the 9 RAPT domains (implementation, evidence, risk, feasibility, measurement, cost, acceptability, alignment, and impact). We used descriptive statistics to summarize the studies and the extent to which interventions were mapped to RAPT domains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 81 studies covering 24 interventions, 64% were in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), 66% reported unspecified pain, and 32% reported unspecified dementia. Of the interventions, the Tailored Activities Program had literature informing the most domains (6 domains), followed by exercise, pain education, and stepwise approaches (5 domains each). Most studies were mapped to the evidence domain (33 studies), few studies to feasibility (7 studies), acceptability (5 studies), and implementation (10 studies) domains, one study to cost, and no studies to risk or impact.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the variety of nonpharmacological pain interventions studied, there is a notable lack of literature that aligns with the RAPT model. Furthermore, there is limited consideration of the specific pain and dementia conditions, as well as the diverse environments where PLWD reside and receive care. These gaps underscore the need for robust and holistic research to ensure pain interventions are effectively tailored and implemented for PLWD. Starting with acceptability and feasibility studies can establish a foundation for building robust evidence, ensuring practical and well-received interventions before larger-scale clinical trials.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 7","pages":"2247-2261"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nonpharmacological pain interventions are effective but underutilized in people living with dementia (PLWD). Leveraging an implementation lens (i.e., the Readiness Assessment for Pragmatic Trials [RAPT] model) to scope the literature may reveal research gaps contributing to this underutilization. The purpose of this scoping review is to summarize the literature, map the studies to the RAPT model, and identify research gaps.

Methods

Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA- ScR) guidelines, two reviewers screened, collated, extracted, and mapped data from eligible studies to the 9 RAPT domains (implementation, evidence, risk, feasibility, measurement, cost, acceptability, alignment, and impact). We used descriptive statistics to summarize the studies and the extent to which interventions were mapped to RAPT domains.

Results

Of 81 studies covering 24 interventions, 64% were in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), 66% reported unspecified pain, and 32% reported unspecified dementia. Of the interventions, the Tailored Activities Program had literature informing the most domains (6 domains), followed by exercise, pain education, and stepwise approaches (5 domains each). Most studies were mapped to the evidence domain (33 studies), few studies to feasibility (7 studies), acceptability (5 studies), and implementation (10 studies) domains, one study to cost, and no studies to risk or impact.

Conclusion

Despite the variety of nonpharmacological pain interventions studied, there is a notable lack of literature that aligns with the RAPT model. Furthermore, there is limited consideration of the specific pain and dementia conditions, as well as the diverse environments where PLWD reside and receive care. These gaps underscore the need for robust and holistic research to ensure pain interventions are effectively tailored and implemented for PLWD. Starting with acceptability and feasibility studies can establish a foundation for building robust evidence, ensuring practical and well-received interventions before larger-scale clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症患者的非药物疼痛管理:从实用主义角度对研究差距进行范围审查。
背景:非药物疼痛干预是有效的,但未充分利用痴呆症患者(PLWD)。利用实现视角(例如,实用试验的准备评估[RAPT]模型)来界定文献可能会揭示导致这种未充分利用的研究差距。此范围综述的目的是总结文献,将研究映射到RAPT模型,并确定研究空白。方法:根据Arksey和O'Malley的框架和首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA- ScR)指南,两位审评者筛选、整理、提取并将符合条件的研究数据映射到9个RAPT领域(实施、证据、风险、可行性、测量、成本、可接受性、一致性和影响)。我们使用描述性统计来总结研究和干预措施映射到RAPT域的程度。结果:在涵盖24项干预措施的81项研究中,64%在长期护理机构(ltcf), 66%报告了不明原因的疼痛,32%报告了不明原因的痴呆。在干预措施中,“量身定制活动计划”的文献涵盖了最多的领域(6个领域),其次是运动、疼痛教育和逐步方法(各5个领域)。大多数研究被映射到证据领域(33项研究),少数研究被映射到可行性领域(7项研究),可接受性领域(5项研究)和实施领域(10项研究),一项研究被映射到成本领域,没有研究被映射到风险或影响领域。结论:尽管研究了多种非药物疼痛干预措施,但明显缺乏与RAPT模型一致的文献。此外,对特定的疼痛和痴呆状况以及PLWD居住和接受护理的不同环境的考虑有限。这些差距强调需要进行强有力和全面的研究,以确保有效地为PLWD量身定制和实施疼痛干预措施。从可接受性和可行性研究开始,可以为建立强有力的证据奠定基础,确保在大规模临床试验之前进行实际和受欢迎的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
NOTICES Issue Information Cover When Delirium Unmasks a Silent Myocardial Infarction NOTICES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1