Does farmland transfer promote green agricultural production? An empirical analysis of fertilizer and pesticide reduction

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144631
Shiguang Peng , Le Wang , Lei Xu
{"title":"Does farmland transfer promote green agricultural production? An empirical analysis of fertilizer and pesticide reduction","authors":"Shiguang Peng ,&nbsp;Le Wang ,&nbsp;Lei Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advancing green agricultural production is essential for achieving sustainable and ecologically responsible agricultural development. Farmland transfer offers a novel pathway for bolstering green agricultural production. Based on the theory of optimal resource allocation, this study theoretically analyzes the impact of farmland transfer on fertilizer and pesticide reduction and its transmission mechanisms. It also conducts empirical tests using multiple regression models with provincial-level balanced panel data from China for the period 2008–2021. The main results are as follows. First, farmland transfer can simultaneously reduce fertilizer and pesticide input intensities, indicating that it can promote green agricultural production. Specifically, for a 0.100 increase in the level of farmland transfer, fertilizer input intensity decreases by 3.30% on average, while pesticide input intensity decreases by 3.62%. Second, advancing large-scale management, facilitating agricultural mechanization, and promoting grain planting are the transmission mechanisms through which farmland transfer reduces fertilizer and pesticide input intensities. Specifically, for a 0.100 increase in the level of farmland transfer, the number of large-scale management subjects increases by 14.84%, while the levels of agricultural mechanization and grain planting increase by 0.001 and 0.024, respectively. Third, government environmental concern can have a positive moderating influence on the negative relationship between farmland transfer and fertilizer and pesticide input intensities. Fourth, the negative effect of farmland transfer on fertilizer and pesticide input intensities is stronger in major grain-producing areas and the Yangtze River Economic Belt than in other areas. Specifically, for a 0.100 increase in the level of farmland transfer, the reductions in fertilizer and pesticide input intensities in major grain-producing areas are 2.30 and 3.83 percentage points higher, respectively, than those in other areas. Similarly, in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, the reductions in fertilizer and pesticide input intensities are 5.12 and 9.64 percentage points greater, respectively, than those in other areas. This study has valuable implications for adjusting farmland transfer policies to promote green agricultural production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"489 ","pages":"Article 144631"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624040800","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advancing green agricultural production is essential for achieving sustainable and ecologically responsible agricultural development. Farmland transfer offers a novel pathway for bolstering green agricultural production. Based on the theory of optimal resource allocation, this study theoretically analyzes the impact of farmland transfer on fertilizer and pesticide reduction and its transmission mechanisms. It also conducts empirical tests using multiple regression models with provincial-level balanced panel data from China for the period 2008–2021. The main results are as follows. First, farmland transfer can simultaneously reduce fertilizer and pesticide input intensities, indicating that it can promote green agricultural production. Specifically, for a 0.100 increase in the level of farmland transfer, fertilizer input intensity decreases by 3.30% on average, while pesticide input intensity decreases by 3.62%. Second, advancing large-scale management, facilitating agricultural mechanization, and promoting grain planting are the transmission mechanisms through which farmland transfer reduces fertilizer and pesticide input intensities. Specifically, for a 0.100 increase in the level of farmland transfer, the number of large-scale management subjects increases by 14.84%, while the levels of agricultural mechanization and grain planting increase by 0.001 and 0.024, respectively. Third, government environmental concern can have a positive moderating influence on the negative relationship between farmland transfer and fertilizer and pesticide input intensities. Fourth, the negative effect of farmland transfer on fertilizer and pesticide input intensities is stronger in major grain-producing areas and the Yangtze River Economic Belt than in other areas. Specifically, for a 0.100 increase in the level of farmland transfer, the reductions in fertilizer and pesticide input intensities in major grain-producing areas are 2.30 and 3.83 percentage points higher, respectively, than those in other areas. Similarly, in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, the reductions in fertilizer and pesticide input intensities are 5.12 and 9.64 percentage points greater, respectively, than those in other areas. This study has valuable implications for adjusting farmland transfer policies to promote green agricultural production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农地流转是否促进了绿色农业生产?化肥农药减量的实证分析
推进农业绿色生产是实现农业可持续发展和生态负责任发展的必然要求。农地流转为促进绿色农业生产提供了新的途径。基于资源最优配置理论,从理论上分析了农地流转对化肥农药减量的影响及其传导机制。本文还利用中国2008 - 2021年的省级均衡面板数据,利用多元回归模型进行了实证检验。主要结果如下:首先,农地流转可以同时降低化肥和农药的投入强度,表明可以促进绿色农业生产。具体而言,农地流转水平每提高0.100,化肥投入强度平均降低3.30%,农药投入强度平均降低3.62%。二是推进规模化经营、推进农业机械化、促进粮食种植是农田流转降低化肥农药投入强度的传导机制。其中,农地流转水平每提高0.100,规模化经营主体数量增长14.84%,农业机械化水平和粮食种植水平分别增长0.001和0.024%。政府环境关注对农地流转与化肥农药投入强度的负向关系具有正向调节作用。④农田流转对化肥农药投入强度的负面影响在主产区和长江经济带地区强于其他地区。其中,耕地流转水平每提高0.100个百分点,主产区化肥和农药投入强度降幅分别比其他地区高2.30和3.83个百分点。同样,长江经济带化肥和农药投入强度降幅分别比其他地区高5.12和9.64个百分点。本研究对于调整农地流转政策,促进绿色农业生产具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Optimization of hydrogen blending locations in natural gas pipeline networks with the objective of satisfaction Generative design for sustainability-oriented factory planning Quantifying market volume sensitivity to material property modifications in polyhydroxybutyrate: A parametric analysis approach ESG performance and firm undervaluation in the global logistics sector: The moderating roles of institutional quality and controversy management capability Battery recycling and critical material demand in electric vehicle scenarios to 2050
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1