{"title":"Economic and Environmental Feasibility Evaluation Study of Hydrometallurgical Recycling Methods for Perovskite Solar Cells","authors":"Hyunmin Oh, Jongil Bae, Jeehoon Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the economic and environmental feasibility of three processes to recycle perovskite solar cells (PSCs) that contain lead ions: two adsorption methods, one with HAF/Fe adsorbent (Case 1) and one with WAC-resin (Case 2) adsorbent, and one extraction method that uses water (Case 3). Techno-economic analysis (TEA) indicates that Case 2 is more economically feasible (-2.54 US$ m<sup>-2</sup> PSCs) than Case 1 (447.07 US$ m<sup>-2</sup> PSCs) and Case 3 (2.48 US$ m<sup>-2</sup> PSCs). A life cycle analysis (LCA) was also conducted for four impact categories, global-warming potential (GWP), terrestrial ecotoxicity (TETP), freshwater ecotoxicity (FETP), and human toxicity (HTP). These analyses indicate that Case 3 is less environmentally damaging (-0.04 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-Eq, 12,91 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, -14.55 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, and 3.50 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, respectively) than Case 1 and Case 2. Sensitivity analysis of TEA and LCA reveals that the solvent reusability (0–30 times) is the dominant economic and environmental indicator for all PSCs recycling processes, especially Case 1 (447.07 – 11.30 US$ m<sup>-2</sup> PSCs, 3.83 – 0.55 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-Eq, 2.75 – 2.73 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, 0.26 – 0.22 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, 90.12 – 22.00 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, respectively). Transportation distance of discarded PSCs, adsorbent price, and adsorbent reusability were also found to be major process variables affecting economic and environmental performance. This study provides future guidelines for the development of more economical and environmentally-benign hydrometallurgical processes to recycle PSCs.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates the economic and environmental feasibility of three processes to recycle perovskite solar cells (PSCs) that contain lead ions: two adsorption methods, one with HAF/Fe adsorbent (Case 1) and one with WAC-resin (Case 2) adsorbent, and one extraction method that uses water (Case 3). Techno-economic analysis (TEA) indicates that Case 2 is more economically feasible (-2.54 US$ m-2 PSCs) than Case 1 (447.07 US$ m-2 PSCs) and Case 3 (2.48 US$ m-2 PSCs). A life cycle analysis (LCA) was also conducted for four impact categories, global-warming potential (GWP), terrestrial ecotoxicity (TETP), freshwater ecotoxicity (FETP), and human toxicity (HTP). These analyses indicate that Case 3 is less environmentally damaging (-0.04 kg CO2-Eq, 12,91 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, -14.55 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, and 3.50 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, respectively) than Case 1 and Case 2. Sensitivity analysis of TEA and LCA reveals that the solvent reusability (0–30 times) is the dominant economic and environmental indicator for all PSCs recycling processes, especially Case 1 (447.07 – 11.30 US$ m-2 PSCs, 3.83 – 0.55 kg CO2-Eq, 2.75 – 2.73 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, 0.26 – 0.22 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, 90.12 – 22.00 kg 1,4-DCB-Eq, respectively). Transportation distance of discarded PSCs, adsorbent price, and adsorbent reusability were also found to be major process variables affecting economic and environmental performance. This study provides future guidelines for the development of more economical and environmentally-benign hydrometallurgical processes to recycle PSCs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.