Field phytometers and lab tests demonstrate that rock dust can outperform dolomite and fertilisers for acid forest soil restoration

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Plant and Soil Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s11104-024-07175-8
Robrecht Van Der Bauwhede, Leon van den Berg, Karen Vancampenhout, Erik Smolders, Bart Muys
{"title":"Field phytometers and lab tests demonstrate that rock dust can outperform dolomite and fertilisers for acid forest soil restoration","authors":"Robrecht Van Der Bauwhede, Leon van den Berg, Karen Vancampenhout, Erik Smolders, Bart Muys","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07175-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Soil amendments with rock dust have been proposed for restoring regeneration on ultra-acidified forest soils. Rock dust is a poorly defined amendment, and its mode of action remains unclear. This study was set up to identify rock dust properties that predict plant responses in the field.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A field experiment with sycamore maple (<i>Acer pseudoplatanus</i> L.) saplings in two sites in the Campine region (NL) was constructed, both at a clearcut (soil pH = 3.5) and under the canopy of <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> L. (pH = 3.1). Treatments included six rock dusts and four reference treatments (TSP, dolomite, KCl, their combination). Rock dusts were amended in the planting pit and broadcast after being characterised for chemical composition and tested for dissolution in accelerated laboratory tests. Sapling growth was monitored for 40 months.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Tree growth was affected by the site and rock dust type. The highest tree volume increases relative to the unamended control were with phonolite that increased volume by a factor 2 (clearcut) and by a factor 8 (under-canopy). On the clearcut, these increases were larger than the reference conventional dolomite and fertilisation treatments. Here, growth was only explained by rock dust’s water retention, which was superior for a zeolite-containing rock dust. Under-canopy, both growth and foliar nutrition were best related to liming and nutrient release by rock dust inferred from an 8-week laboratory-based soil + rock dust suspension test.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Rock dusts are effective to regenerate acid forest soils and laboratory tests of accelerated weathering can inform their potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07175-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Soil amendments with rock dust have been proposed for restoring regeneration on ultra-acidified forest soils. Rock dust is a poorly defined amendment, and its mode of action remains unclear. This study was set up to identify rock dust properties that predict plant responses in the field.

Methods

A field experiment with sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) saplings in two sites in the Campine region (NL) was constructed, both at a clearcut (soil pH = 3.5) and under the canopy of Pinus sylvestris L. (pH = 3.1). Treatments included six rock dusts and four reference treatments (TSP, dolomite, KCl, their combination). Rock dusts were amended in the planting pit and broadcast after being characterised for chemical composition and tested for dissolution in accelerated laboratory tests. Sapling growth was monitored for 40 months.

Results

Tree growth was affected by the site and rock dust type. The highest tree volume increases relative to the unamended control were with phonolite that increased volume by a factor 2 (clearcut) and by a factor 8 (under-canopy). On the clearcut, these increases were larger than the reference conventional dolomite and fertilisation treatments. Here, growth was only explained by rock dust’s water retention, which was superior for a zeolite-containing rock dust. Under-canopy, both growth and foliar nutrition were best related to liming and nutrient release by rock dust inferred from an 8-week laboratory-based soil + rock dust suspension test.

Conclusion

Rock dusts are effective to regenerate acid forest soils and laboratory tests of accelerated weathering can inform their potential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野外植物计和实验室试验表明,岩石粉尘在酸性森林土壤恢复方面的效果优于白云石和肥料
背景与目的岩尘土壤改良剂被提出用于恢复超酸化森林土壤的再生。岩尘是一种定义不清的修正物,其作用方式尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定岩石粉尘的特性,以预测植物在田间的反应。方法在阔叶林(土壤pH = 3.5)和西洋松(Pinus sylvestris L.)林冠下(pH = 3.1)两个地点,以槭(Acer pseudoplatanus L.)树苗为研究对象,进行了田间试验。处理包括6个岩尘处理和4个参比处理(TSP、白云石、氯化钾及其组合)。在对岩石粉尘进行化学成分鉴定并在实验室加速试验中进行溶解测试后,在种植坑中进行了修正和广播。对树苗生长进行了40个月的监测。结果树木生长受场地和岩尘类型的影响。相对于未修改的对照,最大的树木体积增加是使用了phonolite,其体积增加了2倍(未砍伐)和8倍(树冠下)。在空旷地,这些增加大于参考常规白云石和施肥处理。在这里,生长只能用岩石粉尘的保水性来解释,这对于含有沸石的岩石粉尘来说是优越的。通过为期8周的室内土壤+岩尘悬浮液试验推断,在冠层下,生长和叶面营养与岩尘的石灰化和养分释放关系最为密切。结论岩尘对酸性森林土壤具有较好的再生效果,室内加速风化试验可以揭示其潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation strategies of three legumes to soil phosphorus availability in steppes of Inner Mongolia Linkage between plant nitrogen preference and rhizosphere effects on soil nitrogen transformation reveals a plant resource adaptive strategies in nitrogen-limited soils Water consumption turning point for Robinia pseudoacacia occurs at its middle stand age The divergent response of fungal and bacterial necromass carbon in soil aggregates under biochar amendment in paddy soil Flooding-driven gravel encroachment reshapes plant community structure and reduces community stability in an arid alluvial fan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1