Farivash Karamian, Roham Nikkhah, Mohammad Ghorbani, Elham Rahmanipour, Mohammad Mohammadi, Emran Askari, Ramin Sadeghi
{"title":"How necessary it is to perform a ventilation scan in patients with a history of COVID-19 to rule out pulmonary thromboembolism?","authors":"Farivash Karamian, Roham Nikkhah, Mohammad Ghorbani, Elham Rahmanipour, Mohammad Mohammadi, Emran Askari, Ramin Sadeghi","doi":"10.22038/aojnmb.2024.77934.1550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the necessity of a ventilation scan in patients suspected of PE with a history of COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 and suspected PE at a tertiary care hospital in 2020. They underwent ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy using single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and CT scans with or without contrast. Two blinded nuclear medicine physicians interpreted the images for PE and COVID-19. Clinical and laboratory data were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>96 patients with suspected PE and COVID-19 infection. The study excluded eight patients who could not undergo ventilation scans and confirmed PE in five patients with multiple mismatched V/Q defects on SPECT/CT. The study ruled out PE in 83 patients who had either regular perfusion scans, perfusion defects with COVID-19 features, or matched V/Q defects. The study found that the prevalence of PE was 5.68%, and the necessity of ventilation scans was 28.40% in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that PE was present in 5.68% of the patients, and ventilation scans were needed for 28.40% of the patients to confirm or exclude it.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":"13 1","pages":"70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2024.77934.1550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated the necessity of a ventilation scan in patients suspected of PE with a history of COVID-19 infection.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 and suspected PE at a tertiary care hospital in 2020. They underwent ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy using single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and CT scans with or without contrast. Two blinded nuclear medicine physicians interpreted the images for PE and COVID-19. Clinical and laboratory data were extracted and analyzed.
Results: 96 patients with suspected PE and COVID-19 infection. The study excluded eight patients who could not undergo ventilation scans and confirmed PE in five patients with multiple mismatched V/Q defects on SPECT/CT. The study ruled out PE in 83 patients who had either regular perfusion scans, perfusion defects with COVID-19 features, or matched V/Q defects. The study found that the prevalence of PE was 5.68%, and the necessity of ventilation scans was 28.40% in this population.
Conclusion: It was found that PE was present in 5.68% of the patients, and ventilation scans were needed for 28.40% of the patients to confirm or exclude it.