Samuel W. Terman , Jordan M. Silva , Max Kuster , Jasper Lee , Amanda Brand , Kara Manuel , Navya Kalia , Micaela Dugan , Marla Reid , Katherine Mortati , Alexandra Tolmasov , Palak S. Patel , James F. Burke , Arthur C. Grant , Susanna S. O’Kula , Chloe E. Hill
{"title":"Development of a rapid screener to elicit patient preferences for antiseizure medication discontinuation","authors":"Samuel W. Terman , Jordan M. Silva , Max Kuster , Jasper Lee , Amanda Brand , Kara Manuel , Navya Kalia , Micaela Dugan , Marla Reid , Katherine Mortati , Alexandra Tolmasov , Palak S. Patel , James F. Burke , Arthur C. Grant , Susanna S. O’Kula , Chloe E. Hill","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>While guidelines encourage individualized discussions of the risks and benefits of antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal after a period of seizure-freedom, no formal methods exist for assessing patient preferences. We report the initial development of a rapid patient preferences screener.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a mixed-methods study of adults who were ≥1 year seizure-free and seen for epilepsy across three institutions. We reviewed existing questionnaires and adapted three questions measuring core constructs influencing ASM decisions – views about ASMs, driving restrictions, and seizures. We added one additional “global” question, for 4 total questions. Participants rated question clarity and utility from 1 (low) to 7 (high).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 32 participants, the median patient age was 46 (interquartile range [IQR] 33–56), with a median 3 years since their last seizure (IQR 2–11). Median responses were: 2 (IQR 1–5) for being bothered by ASMs, 2 (IQR 1–6) for feeling that a driving restriction would be disruptive, and 5 (IQR 4–7) for feeling that another seizure would be serious. Respondents tended to disagree that ASMs are doing more harm than good (median 1, IQR 1–2). Participants rated question clarity (median 6, IQR 6–7) and utility (median 7, IQR 6–7) highly.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We report the initial development of a pre-visit rapid screener of patient preferences pertinent to ASM withdrawal in well-controlled epilepsy. Patients endorsed the utility of such a screener and provided guidance to improve items. We hope that this work will ultimately improve shared decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 110240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152550502400622X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
While guidelines encourage individualized discussions of the risks and benefits of antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal after a period of seizure-freedom, no formal methods exist for assessing patient preferences. We report the initial development of a rapid patient preferences screener.
Methods
We conducted a mixed-methods study of adults who were ≥1 year seizure-free and seen for epilepsy across three institutions. We reviewed existing questionnaires and adapted three questions measuring core constructs influencing ASM decisions – views about ASMs, driving restrictions, and seizures. We added one additional “global” question, for 4 total questions. Participants rated question clarity and utility from 1 (low) to 7 (high).
Results
Of 32 participants, the median patient age was 46 (interquartile range [IQR] 33–56), with a median 3 years since their last seizure (IQR 2–11). Median responses were: 2 (IQR 1–5) for being bothered by ASMs, 2 (IQR 1–6) for feeling that a driving restriction would be disruptive, and 5 (IQR 4–7) for feeling that another seizure would be serious. Respondents tended to disagree that ASMs are doing more harm than good (median 1, IQR 1–2). Participants rated question clarity (median 6, IQR 6–7) and utility (median 7, IQR 6–7) highly.
Conclusions
We report the initial development of a pre-visit rapid screener of patient preferences pertinent to ASM withdrawal in well-controlled epilepsy. Patients endorsed the utility of such a screener and provided guidance to improve items. We hope that this work will ultimately improve shared decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging.
From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.