Left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortical Activity During Reward Expectancy and Mania Risk.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY JAMA Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.4216
Manan Arora, Henry Chase, Michele A Bertocci, Alexander S Skeba, Kristen Eckstrand, Genna Bebko, Haris A Aslam, Robert Raeder, Simona Graur, Osasumwen Benjamin, Yiming Wang, Richelle S Stiffler, Mary L Phillips
{"title":"Left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortical Activity During Reward Expectancy and Mania Risk.","authors":"Manan Arora, Henry Chase, Michele A Bertocci, Alexander S Skeba, Kristen Eckstrand, Genna Bebko, Haris A Aslam, Robert Raeder, Simona Graur, Osasumwen Benjamin, Yiming Wang, Richelle S Stiffler, Mary L Phillips","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.4216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Mania/hypomania is the pathognomonic feature of bipolar disorder (BD). As BD is often misdiagnosed as major depressive disorder (MDD), replicable neural markers of mania/hypomania risk are needed for earlier BD diagnosis and pathophysiological treatment development.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To replicate the previously reported positive association between left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) activity during reward expectancy (RE) and mania/hypomania risk, to explore the effect of MDD history on this association, and to compare RE-related left vlPFC activity in individuals with and at risk of BD.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2014 to December 2023 at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Three samples were formed comprising young adults (aged 18 to 30 years) without BD and with a range of subsyndromal-syndromal affective and anxiety psychopathologies, including a new sample and 2 test samples from our previous research; a sample of individuals aged 18 to 30 years with euthymic BD was also included. All participants were recruited from the community through advertising.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Functional magnetic resonance imaging during an RE task.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>New sample: whole-brain activity during RE regressed to the Mood Spectrum Self-Report Lifetime Questionnaire (MOODS-SR-L) manic domain score in all participants and in those without history of MDD and RE-related whole-brain activity regressed to the MOODS-SR-L depressive domain score to determine specificity to mania/hypomania risk. Test samples: these associations were examined using parameter estimates of activity extracted from respective masks created from activity in the new sample. A tertile split of MOODS-SR-L manic domain score divided the new sample into 3 mania/hypomania risk groups. Comparison of RE-related activity (extracted parameter estimates) was performed in risk groups and individuals with BD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 113 individuals in the new sample, 73 were female, and the mean (SD) age was 23.88 (3.32) years. In each of the test samples, there were 52 individuals (39 female; mean [SD] age, 21.94 [2.12] years) and 65 individuals (47 female; mean [SD] age, 21.39 [2.11] years). The euthymic BD group had 37 individuals (30 female; mean [SD] age, 25.12 [3.81] years). In the new sample, 8 clusters of RE-related activity, including left vlPFC activity, showed a positive association with mania/hypomania risk, which remained after excluding individuals with MDD history and was specific to mania/hypomania risk. In the test samples, this association was shown in test sample 1 only (β, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08-0.35; P = .002; q(false discovery rate [FDR]), 0.006; R2, 0.04). Test sample 2 had a higher proportion with MDD history (49 of 65 [75.3%] compared to 31 of 52 [59.6%] in sample 1). Combining individuals without history of MDD in both test samples replicated the association (β, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.08-0.58; P = .01; q[FDR], 0.023; R2, 0.02). RE-related left vlPFC activity was significantly greater in individuals at highest risk vs lowest (Cohen d, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.29-0.79; P < .001) and medium (Cohen d, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.12-0.63; P = .004) risk, as well as the euthymic BD group (Cohen d, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.07-0.58; P = .01), potentially due to medication effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Elevated RE-related left vlPFC activity was associated with mania/hypomania risk and attenuated by MDD history. These findings provide a neural target to help develop pathophysiological interventions for individuals with or at risk of mania/hypomania.</p>","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.4216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Mania/hypomania is the pathognomonic feature of bipolar disorder (BD). As BD is often misdiagnosed as major depressive disorder (MDD), replicable neural markers of mania/hypomania risk are needed for earlier BD diagnosis and pathophysiological treatment development.

Objective: To replicate the previously reported positive association between left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) activity during reward expectancy (RE) and mania/hypomania risk, to explore the effect of MDD history on this association, and to compare RE-related left vlPFC activity in individuals with and at risk of BD.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2014 to December 2023 at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Three samples were formed comprising young adults (aged 18 to 30 years) without BD and with a range of subsyndromal-syndromal affective and anxiety psychopathologies, including a new sample and 2 test samples from our previous research; a sample of individuals aged 18 to 30 years with euthymic BD was also included. All participants were recruited from the community through advertising.

Exposures: Functional magnetic resonance imaging during an RE task.

Main outcomes and measures: New sample: whole-brain activity during RE regressed to the Mood Spectrum Self-Report Lifetime Questionnaire (MOODS-SR-L) manic domain score in all participants and in those without history of MDD and RE-related whole-brain activity regressed to the MOODS-SR-L depressive domain score to determine specificity to mania/hypomania risk. Test samples: these associations were examined using parameter estimates of activity extracted from respective masks created from activity in the new sample. A tertile split of MOODS-SR-L manic domain score divided the new sample into 3 mania/hypomania risk groups. Comparison of RE-related activity (extracted parameter estimates) was performed in risk groups and individuals with BD.

Results: Among the 113 individuals in the new sample, 73 were female, and the mean (SD) age was 23.88 (3.32) years. In each of the test samples, there were 52 individuals (39 female; mean [SD] age, 21.94 [2.12] years) and 65 individuals (47 female; mean [SD] age, 21.39 [2.11] years). The euthymic BD group had 37 individuals (30 female; mean [SD] age, 25.12 [3.81] years). In the new sample, 8 clusters of RE-related activity, including left vlPFC activity, showed a positive association with mania/hypomania risk, which remained after excluding individuals with MDD history and was specific to mania/hypomania risk. In the test samples, this association was shown in test sample 1 only (β, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08-0.35; P = .002; q(false discovery rate [FDR]), 0.006; R2, 0.04). Test sample 2 had a higher proportion with MDD history (49 of 65 [75.3%] compared to 31 of 52 [59.6%] in sample 1). Combining individuals without history of MDD in both test samples replicated the association (β, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.08-0.58; P = .01; q[FDR], 0.023; R2, 0.02). RE-related left vlPFC activity was significantly greater in individuals at highest risk vs lowest (Cohen d, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.29-0.79; P < .001) and medium (Cohen d, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.12-0.63; P = .004) risk, as well as the euthymic BD group (Cohen d, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.07-0.58; P = .01), potentially due to medication effects.

Conclusion and relevance: Elevated RE-related left vlPFC activity was associated with mania/hypomania risk and attenuated by MDD history. These findings provide a neural target to help develop pathophysiological interventions for individuals with or at risk of mania/hypomania.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Genetic Analysis of Retinal Cell Types in Neuropsychiatric Disorders Modifying Informed Consent to Help Address Functional Unmasking in Psychedelic Clinical Trials The Promise and Perils of Using Peers and Other Paraprofessionals as Mental Health Service Professionals. What the Experiences of Young Persons Can Teach Us About Medical Aid in Dying for Psychiatric Illness. Left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortical Activity During Reward Expectancy and Mania Risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1