Validation of a novel tool for automated tooth modelling by fusion of CBCT-derived roots with the respective IOS-derived crowns

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105546
Benedetta Baldini , Dhanaporn Papasratorn , Fernanda Bulhões Fagundes , Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele , Reinhilde Jacobs
{"title":"Validation of a novel tool for automated tooth modelling by fusion of CBCT-derived roots with the respective IOS-derived crowns","authors":"Benedetta Baldini ,&nbsp;Dhanaporn Papasratorn ,&nbsp;Fernanda Bulhões Fagundes ,&nbsp;Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele ,&nbsp;Reinhilde Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To validate a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for automated tooth modelling by fusing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived roots with corresponding intraoral scanner (IOS)-derived crowns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective dataset of 30 patients, comprising 30 CBCT scans and 55 IOS dental arches, was used to evaluate the fusion model at full arch and single tooth levels. AI-fused models were compared with CBCT tooth segmentation using point-to-point surface distances—reported as median surface distance (MSD), root mean square distance (RMSD), and Hausdorff distance (HD)— alongside visual assessments. Qualitative assessment included visual inspection of CBCT multiplanar views. The automated fused model was also compared to expert-manual fusions for single tooth analysis in terms of accuracy, time efficiency, and consistency.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AI-based fusion evaluation showed mean values of MSD, RMSD, and HD of 4 μm, 114 μm, and 940 μm for full arch; 5 μm, 104 μm, and 503 μm for single tooth analysis. Qualitative assessment showed discrepancies between fused tooth outline and CBCT tooth margin lower than 1 voxel for 59% of cases. AI-based fusion showed high similarity with expert-manual fusions with median MSD, RMSD, and HD values of 28 μm, 104 μm, and 576 μm, respectively. However, AI-based fusion was 32 times faster than manual fusion. Considering the time required for manual fusion, intra-observer agreement was high (ICC 0.93), while inter-observer agreement was moderate (ICC 0.48).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AI-based CBCT/IOS fusion demonstrated clinically acceptable accuracy, efficiency, and consistency, offering substantial time savings and robust performance across different patients and imaging devices.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>Manual CBCT/IOS fusion performed by experts is effective but labor-intensive and time-consuming. AI algorithms show a remarkable ability to minimize human variability, resulting in more reliable and efficient fusion. This capability demonstrates the potential to provide a more personalized, precise and standardized approach for treatment planning and dental procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 105546"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224007152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To validate a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for automated tooth modelling by fusing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived roots with corresponding intraoral scanner (IOS)-derived crowns.

Methods

A retrospective dataset of 30 patients, comprising 30 CBCT scans and 55 IOS dental arches, was used to evaluate the fusion model at full arch and single tooth levels. AI-fused models were compared with CBCT tooth segmentation using point-to-point surface distances—reported as median surface distance (MSD), root mean square distance (RMSD), and Hausdorff distance (HD)— alongside visual assessments. Qualitative assessment included visual inspection of CBCT multiplanar views. The automated fused model was also compared to expert-manual fusions for single tooth analysis in terms of accuracy, time efficiency, and consistency.

Results

AI-based fusion evaluation showed mean values of MSD, RMSD, and HD of 4 μm, 114 μm, and 940 μm for full arch; 5 μm, 104 μm, and 503 μm for single tooth analysis. Qualitative assessment showed discrepancies between fused tooth outline and CBCT tooth margin lower than 1 voxel for 59% of cases. AI-based fusion showed high similarity with expert-manual fusions with median MSD, RMSD, and HD values of 28 μm, 104 μm, and 576 μm, respectively. However, AI-based fusion was 32 times faster than manual fusion. Considering the time required for manual fusion, intra-observer agreement was high (ICC 0.93), while inter-observer agreement was moderate (ICC 0.48).

Conclusion

The AI-based CBCT/IOS fusion demonstrated clinically acceptable accuracy, efficiency, and consistency, offering substantial time savings and robust performance across different patients and imaging devices.

Clinical significance

Manual CBCT/IOS fusion performed by experts is effective but labor-intensive and time-consuming. AI algorithms show a remarkable ability to minimize human variability, resulting in more reliable and efficient fusion. This capability demonstrates the potential to provide a more personalized, precise and standardized approach for treatment planning and dental procedures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过cbct衍生牙根与各自的ios衍生冠融合,验证一种新型自动牙齿建模工具。
目的:验证一种新的基于人工智能(AI)的自动牙齿建模工具,该工具将锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)衍生的牙根与相应的口内扫描仪(IOS)衍生的牙冠融合在一起。方法:采用30例患者的回顾性数据集,包括30个CBCT扫描和55个IOS牙弓,评估全牙弓和单牙水平的融合模型。将人工智能融合模型与CBCT牙齿分割进行比较,使用点对点表面距离-报告为中位数表面距离(MSD),均方根距离(RMSD)和Hausdorff距离(HD)-以及视觉评估。定性评价包括CBCT多平面视觉检查。在准确性、时间效率和一致性方面,还将自动融合模型与专家-手动融合进行了单齿分析。结果:人工智能融合评估显示全弓的MSD、RMSD和HD均值分别为4 μm、114 μm和940 μm;5 μm, 104 μm和503 μm用于单齿分析。定性评估显示59%的病例融合牙轮廓与CBCT牙缘差异小于1体素。人工智能融合与专家-手工融合具有较高的相似性,平均MSD、RMSD和HD值分别为28 μm、104 μm和576 μm。然而,基于人工智能的融合比人工融合快32倍。考虑到人工融合所需的时间,观察者内部的一致性很高(ICC 0.93),而观察者之间的一致性中等(ICC 0.48)。结论:基于人工智能的CBCT/IOS融合显示出临床可接受的准确性、效率和一致性,在不同的患者和成像设备上提供了大量的时间节省和强大的性能。临床意义:专家手工CBCT/IOS融合有效,但费时费力。人工智能算法显示出将人类可变性降至最低的卓越能力,从而实现更可靠、更有效的融合。这种能力显示了为治疗计划和牙科程序提供更加个性化、精确和标准化方法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Synthesis and application of calcium cyclotriphosphate in bleaching formulations: effects on dental enamel properties. Adjunctive use of Hyaluronic Acid in non-surgical periodontal therapy: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis. In situ remineralization of enamel caries lesions with a toothpaste supplemented with fluoride, amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide and trimetaphosphate. Effect of surface conditioning on the adhesive bond strength of 3D-printed resins used in permanent fixed dental prostheses. Evaluation of the accuracy (trueness, precision) and processing time of different 3-dimensional CAD software programs and algorithms for virtual cast alignment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1