{"title":"Validation of a novel tool for automated tooth modelling by fusion of CBCT-derived roots with the respective IOS-derived crowns","authors":"Benedetta Baldini , Dhanaporn Papasratorn , Fernanda Bulhões Fagundes , Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele , Reinhilde Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To validate a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for automated tooth modelling by fusing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived roots with corresponding intraoral scanner (IOS)-derived crowns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective dataset of 30 patients, comprising 30 CBCT scans and 55 IOS dental arches, was used to evaluate the fusion model at full arch and single tooth levels. AI-fused models were compared with CBCT tooth segmentation using point-to-point surface distances—reported as median surface distance (MSD), root mean square distance (RMSD), and Hausdorff distance (HD)— alongside visual assessments. Qualitative assessment included visual inspection of CBCT multiplanar views. The automated fused model was also compared to expert-manual fusions for single tooth analysis in terms of accuracy, time efficiency, and consistency.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AI-based fusion evaluation showed mean values of MSD, RMSD, and HD of 4 μm, 114 μm, and 940 μm for full arch; 5 μm, 104 μm, and 503 μm for single tooth analysis. Qualitative assessment showed discrepancies between fused tooth outline and CBCT tooth margin lower than 1 voxel for 59% of cases. AI-based fusion showed high similarity with expert-manual fusions with median MSD, RMSD, and HD values of 28 μm, 104 μm, and 576 μm, respectively. However, AI-based fusion was 32 times faster than manual fusion. Considering the time required for manual fusion, intra-observer agreement was high (ICC 0.93), while inter-observer agreement was moderate (ICC 0.48).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AI-based CBCT/IOS fusion demonstrated clinically acceptable accuracy, efficiency, and consistency, offering substantial time savings and robust performance across different patients and imaging devices.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>Manual CBCT/IOS fusion performed by experts is effective but labor-intensive and time-consuming. AI algorithms show a remarkable ability to minimize human variability, resulting in more reliable and efficient fusion. This capability demonstrates the potential to provide a more personalized, precise and standardized approach for treatment planning and dental procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 105546"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224007152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To validate a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for automated tooth modelling by fusing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived roots with corresponding intraoral scanner (IOS)-derived crowns.
Methods
A retrospective dataset of 30 patients, comprising 30 CBCT scans and 55 IOS dental arches, was used to evaluate the fusion model at full arch and single tooth levels. AI-fused models were compared with CBCT tooth segmentation using point-to-point surface distances—reported as median surface distance (MSD), root mean square distance (RMSD), and Hausdorff distance (HD)— alongside visual assessments. Qualitative assessment included visual inspection of CBCT multiplanar views. The automated fused model was also compared to expert-manual fusions for single tooth analysis in terms of accuracy, time efficiency, and consistency.
Results
AI-based fusion evaluation showed mean values of MSD, RMSD, and HD of 4 μm, 114 μm, and 940 μm for full arch; 5 μm, 104 μm, and 503 μm for single tooth analysis. Qualitative assessment showed discrepancies between fused tooth outline and CBCT tooth margin lower than 1 voxel for 59% of cases. AI-based fusion showed high similarity with expert-manual fusions with median MSD, RMSD, and HD values of 28 μm, 104 μm, and 576 μm, respectively. However, AI-based fusion was 32 times faster than manual fusion. Considering the time required for manual fusion, intra-observer agreement was high (ICC 0.93), while inter-observer agreement was moderate (ICC 0.48).
Conclusion
The AI-based CBCT/IOS fusion demonstrated clinically acceptable accuracy, efficiency, and consistency, offering substantial time savings and robust performance across different patients and imaging devices.
Clinical significance
Manual CBCT/IOS fusion performed by experts is effective but labor-intensive and time-consuming. AI algorithms show a remarkable ability to minimize human variability, resulting in more reliable and efficient fusion. This capability demonstrates the potential to provide a more personalized, precise and standardized approach for treatment planning and dental procedures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.