Association between the EAT-Lancet Diet, Incidence of Cardiovascular Events, and All-Cause Mortality: Results from a Swiss Cohort.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.012
Laís Bhering Martins, Magda Gamba, Anna Stubbendorff, Nathalie Gasser, Laura Löbl, Florian Stern, Ulrika Ericson, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Séverine Vuilleumier, Angeline Chatelan
{"title":"Association between the EAT-Lancet Diet, Incidence of Cardiovascular Events, and All-Cause Mortality: Results from a Swiss Cohort.","authors":"Laís Bhering Martins, Magda Gamba, Anna Stubbendorff, Nathalie Gasser, Laura Löbl, Florian Stern, Ulrika Ericson, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Séverine Vuilleumier, Angeline Chatelan","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An unhealthy diet is a major contributor to several noncommunicable diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, the leading cause of death worldwide. Additionally, our food system has significant impacts on the environment. The EAT-Lancet Commission has recommended a healthy diet that preserves global environmental resources.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This prospective study aimed to evaluate the associations between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and the incidence of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in a Swiss cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the CoLaus/PsyCoLaus cohort study (N = 3866). Dietary intake was assessed using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. The EAT-Lancet adherence score was calculated based on the recommended intake and reference intervals of 12 food components, ranging from 0 to 39 points. Participants were categorized into low-, medium-, and high-adherence groups according to score tertiles. We used Cox Proportional Hazards regressions to assess the association among diet adherence, incident cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a mean follow-up of 7.9 y (SD: ±2.0 y), 294 individuals (7.6%) from our initial sample experienced a first cardiovascular event, and 264 (6.8%) died. Compared with the low-adherence group, the adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.17) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.98) for the medium-adherence and high-adherence groups, respectively (P-trend = 0.04). We observed no association between adherence groups and cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a Swiss cohort, high adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is associated with a potential 30% lower risk of overall mortality. However, it is not associated with cardiovascular events.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An unhealthy diet is a major contributor to several noncommunicable diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, the leading cause of death worldwide. Additionally, our food system has significant impacts on the environment. The EAT-Lancet Commission has recommended a healthy diet that preserves global environmental resources.

Objectives: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the associations between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and the incidence of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in a Swiss cohort.

Methods: We analyzed data from the CoLaus/PsyCoLaus cohort study (N = 3866). Dietary intake was assessed using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. The EAT-Lancet adherence score was calculated based on the recommended intake and reference intervals of 12 food components, ranging from 0 to 39 points. Participants were categorized into low-, medium-, and high-adherence groups according to score tertiles. We used Cox Proportional Hazards regressions to assess the association among diet adherence, incident cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality.

Results: During a mean follow-up of 7.9 y (SD: ±2.0 y), 294 individuals (7.6%) from our initial sample experienced a first cardiovascular event, and 264 (6.8%) died. Compared with the low-adherence group, the adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.17) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.98) for the medium-adherence and high-adherence groups, respectively (P-trend = 0.04). We observed no association between adherence groups and cardiovascular events.

Conclusions: In a Swiss cohort, high adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is associated with a potential 30% lower risk of overall mortality. However, it is not associated with cardiovascular events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EAT-Lancet饮食、心血管事件发生率和全因死亡率之间的关系:来自瑞士队列的结果
背景:不健康的饮食是导致包括心血管疾病(CVD)在内的几种非传染性疾病的主要因素,心血管疾病是世界范围内的主要死亡原因。此外,我们的食物系统对环境有重大影响。EAT-Lancet委员会推荐了一种保护全球环境资源的健康饮食。目的:这项前瞻性研究评估了瑞士队列中坚持EAT-Lancet饮食与心血管事件发生率和全因死亡率之间的关系。方法:我们分析了CoLaus|PsyCoLaus队列研究(n = 3,866)的数据。膳食摄入量采用半定量食物频率问卷进行评估。EAT-Lancet依从性评分是根据12种食物成分的推荐摄入量和参考区间计算的,范围从0到39分。参与者根据得分分位数分为低、中、高依从性组。我们使用Cox比例风险回归来评估饮食依从性、心血管事件发生率和全因死亡率之间的关系。结果:在平均7.9年(SD±2.0)的随访期间,我们的初始样本中有294人(7.6%)经历了首次心血管事件,264人(6.8%)死亡。与低依从性组相比,中等和高依从性组的全因死亡率校正危险比分别为0.88 (95% CI: 0.66-1.17)和0.70 (95% CI: 0.49-0.98)(趋势p = 0.04)。我们没有观察到依从组和心血管事件之间的关联。结论:在一项瑞士队列研究中,高度坚持EAT-Lancet饮食与总死亡率降低30%的潜在风险相关。然而,没有发现EAT-Lancet饮食和心血管事件之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Implications of changes in human milk concentration across the first 6 months of life? Letter to the Editor. Retinol Isotope Dilution Testing in Population-based Surveys: Are We There Yet? The muscle building potential of vegan eating for older folks. Water as a source of iodine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1