Effects of Emotional States on Reproducibilities of Rest Position, Social and Spontaneous Smiles, and Speech.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2024.28
Işıl Bulut, İlke Şahin, Furkan Dindaroğlu
{"title":"Effects of Emotional States on Reproducibilities of Rest Position, Social and Spontaneous Smiles, and Speech.","authors":"Işıl Bulut, İlke Şahin, Furkan Dindaroğlu","doi":"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2024.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of emotional states on reproducibilities of rest position, social and spontaneous smiles, and speech.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 individuals aged 18-22 years were included (mean age; 19.03 years ±1.03). Three emotional states were determined: amusing, sadness, and neutral. The participants watched three different videos in 3 sessions on the same day. After each video, the participants completed a questionnaire to assess their mood. The rest position, social and spontaneous smiles, and speech recordings were gathered from the participants using videographic method. Measurements were made for each function. The Friedman test, One-Way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for statistical evaluations, and intra-observer correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In spontaneous smiles, there were significant differences between amusing and sadness in the smile height (p=0.020); amusing and sadness in the lower lip thickness (p=0.029). In social smiles there was a significant difference between amusing and sadness in the maxillary incisor display (p=0.006). There were no statistically significant differences in the rest position, but clinically significant differences were observed in some participants. In speech, a significant difference was found between amusing and sadness in the distance between the upper lip and subnasal (p=0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reproducibility of social and spontaneous smiles was influenced by various emotional states. However, the rest position exhibits higher reproducibility than social and spontaneous smiles in all emotional states.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"37 4","pages":"201-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2024.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of emotional states on reproducibilities of rest position, social and spontaneous smiles, and speech.

Methods: A total of 30 individuals aged 18-22 years were included (mean age; 19.03 years ±1.03). Three emotional states were determined: amusing, sadness, and neutral. The participants watched three different videos in 3 sessions on the same day. After each video, the participants completed a questionnaire to assess their mood. The rest position, social and spontaneous smiles, and speech recordings were gathered from the participants using videographic method. Measurements were made for each function. The Friedman test, One-Way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for statistical evaluations, and intra-observer correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement were calculated.

Results: In spontaneous smiles, there were significant differences between amusing and sadness in the smile height (p=0.020); amusing and sadness in the lower lip thickness (p=0.029). In social smiles there was a significant difference between amusing and sadness in the maxillary incisor display (p=0.006). There were no statistically significant differences in the rest position, but clinically significant differences were observed in some participants. In speech, a significant difference was found between amusing and sadness in the distance between the upper lip and subnasal (p=0.035).

Conclusion: The reproducibility of social and spontaneous smiles was influenced by various emotional states. However, the rest position exhibits higher reproducibility than social and spontaneous smiles in all emotional states.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪状态对休息姿势、社交和自发微笑及言语再现性的影响。
目的:评价情绪状态对休息姿势、社交和自发微笑、言语再现性的影响。方法:共纳入30例18-22岁的个体(平均年龄;19.03年±1.03年)。确定了三种情绪状态:有趣、悲伤和中性。参与者在同一天的3个环节中观看了3个不同的视频。每个视频结束后,参与者都要完成一份评估他们情绪的问卷。用录像的方法收集了被试的休息姿势、社交和自发的微笑以及讲话录音。对每个功能都进行了测量。采用Friedman检验、单因素方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计评价,并计算观察者内相关系数和Bland-Altman一致限。结果:在自发微笑中,搞笑组与悲伤组的微笑高度差异有统计学意义(p=0.020);有趣和悲伤的下唇厚度(p=0.029)。在社交微笑中,上颌门牙显示的有趣和悲伤有显著差异(p=0.006)。在休息体位上差异无统计学意义,但在一些参与者中观察到临床显著差异。在说话时,有趣和悲伤的人在上唇和鼻下的距离上有显著差异(p=0.035)。结论:社交微笑和自发微笑的再现性受到各种情绪状态的影响。然而,在所有情绪状态下,休息姿势比社交和自发微笑表现出更高的可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of 3D Printer Technologies Using Digital Dental Models. Comparing the Impact of Titanium and Stainless Steel Retainers on Lower Incisor Stability, Periodontal Health, and Retainer Survival: A Preliminary Study. Comparison of the Effects of Fixed and Removable Functional Orthodontic Treatment on the Mandibular Trabecular Bone in Fractal Analysis. Effects of Emotional States on Reproducibilities of Rest Position, Social and Spontaneous Smiles, and Speech. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1