How Can Clinical Communication Alleviate the Negative Impacts of Social Determinants of Health?: A Secondary HINTS 6 Dataset Analysis.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2024-12-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241310094
Qiwei Luna Wu, Tiffany B Kindratt, Grace Ellen Brannon
{"title":"How Can Clinical Communication Alleviate the Negative Impacts of Social Determinants of Health?: A Secondary HINTS 6 Dataset Analysis.","authors":"Qiwei Luna Wu, Tiffany B Kindratt, Grace Ellen Brannon","doi":"10.1177/23743735241310094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structural disparities (eg, food insecurities, housing, and lack of transportation) at different social levels (eg, personal, family, and community) are strong determinants of health, influencing individuals' and population well-being worldwide. Research is scarce examining how clinical communication can mitigate the negative impact of social disparities obstructing the reception of quality healthcare. In this study, we explore the mediation role of patient-centered communication (PCC) between social determinants of health (SDH) and quality of care. Using a sample of 5437 adult who visited a healthcare provider in the past 12 months from the sixth Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6), our key points of findings included that the models showed PCC partially mediating the connections from (a) \"skipped meals\" (effect = -.08, 95%CI = [-.12, -.04]), (b) \"unaffordable meals\" (effect = -.08, 95%CI = [-.11, -.05]), (c) \"fear of eviction\" (effect = -.1, 95%CI = [-.14, -.06]), and (d) \"lack of transportation\" (effect = -.12, 95%CI = [-.16, -.08]) to quality of care (QoC). Specifically, better communication had a positive impact on mediating the disparities; poor communication did not. Demonstrating in a nationally representative sample, our findings indicate the key role of patient-centered clinical communication in effectively alleviating the inherent challenges faced by people with low health literacy and socioeconomic status. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"11 ","pages":"23743735241310094"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241310094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structural disparities (eg, food insecurities, housing, and lack of transportation) at different social levels (eg, personal, family, and community) are strong determinants of health, influencing individuals' and population well-being worldwide. Research is scarce examining how clinical communication can mitigate the negative impact of social disparities obstructing the reception of quality healthcare. In this study, we explore the mediation role of patient-centered communication (PCC) between social determinants of health (SDH) and quality of care. Using a sample of 5437 adult who visited a healthcare provider in the past 12 months from the sixth Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6), our key points of findings included that the models showed PCC partially mediating the connections from (a) "skipped meals" (effect = -.08, 95%CI = [-.12, -.04]), (b) "unaffordable meals" (effect = -.08, 95%CI = [-.11, -.05]), (c) "fear of eviction" (effect = -.1, 95%CI = [-.14, -.06]), and (d) "lack of transportation" (effect = -.12, 95%CI = [-.16, -.08]) to quality of care (QoC). Specifically, better communication had a positive impact on mediating the disparities; poor communication did not. Demonstrating in a nationally representative sample, our findings indicate the key role of patient-centered clinical communication in effectively alleviating the inherent challenges faced by people with low health literacy and socioeconomic status. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床沟通如何减轻健康社会决定因素的负面影响?:二级提示6数据集分析。
不同社会层面(如个人、家庭和社区)的结构性差异(如粮食不安全、住房和交通缺乏)是健康的重要决定因素,影响着全世界个人和人口的福祉。研究很少检查临床沟通如何减轻阻碍接受优质医疗保健的社会差距的负面影响。在本研究中,我们探讨了以病人为中心的沟通(PCC)在健康社会决定因素(SDH)和护理质量之间的中介作用。使用来自第六次健康信息全国趋势调查(提示6)的5437名在过去12个月内访问过医疗保健提供者的成年人样本,我们的发现要点包括模型显示PCC部分中介了(a)的联系。“不吃饭”(效果= -。08, 95%ci =[-]。[12, - 0.04]), (b)“买不起的饭菜”(效果= -。08, 95%ci =[-]。[11, - 0.05]), (c)“害怕被驱逐”(效果= -。1、95%ci =[-]。[14, - 0.06]),以及(d)“缺乏交通工具”(效果= -。12、95%ci =[-]。[16, - 0.08])对护理质量(QoC)的影响。具体而言,更好的沟通对调解差异有积极影响;沟通不畅则不然。在一个具有全国代表性的样本中,我们的研究结果表明,以患者为中心的临床沟通在有效缓解低健康素养和低社会经济地位人群面临的固有挑战方面发挥了关键作用。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gendered Experiences of Intravenous Iron Infusion Reactions: A Patient Perspective. Addressing the Underrepresentation of African American Mental Health Professionals: A Call to Action. Enhancing Patient Choice Through the Development of Physical Therapist Online Biographies. Engaging Patients with Headache in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA): ACTIvated Veterans Engagement Group (ACTIVE) to Improve Delivery of Patient-Centered Headache Services. Impact of Standardized Reporting Systems on Patient Experience in Radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1