Jui-En Lo, Christopher N Schmickl, Florin Vaida, Shamim Nemati, Karandeep Singh, Scott A Sands, Robert L Owens, Atul Malhotra, Jeremy E Orr
{"title":"The combination of physiology and machine learning for prediction of CPAP pressure and residual AHI in OSA.","authors":"Jui-En Lo, Christopher N Schmickl, Florin Vaida, Shamim Nemati, Karandeep Singh, Scott A Sands, Robert L Owens, Atul Malhotra, Jeremy E Orr","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Study Objectives:</b> Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of choice for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however some people have residual respiratory events or require significantly higher CPAP pressure while on therapy. Our objective was to develop predictive models for CPAP outcomes and assess whether the inclusion of physiological traits enhances prediction. <b>Methods:</b> We constructed predictive models from baseline information for subsequent residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and optimal CPAP pressure. We compared models utilizing clinical variables with those incorporating both clinical and physiological factors. Furthermore, we assessed the performance of regression versus machine learning. All performances, including root mean square error (RSME), R-squared, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC), were evaluated using a five-fold cross validation with ten repeats. <b>Results:</b> For predicting residual AHI, random forest models outperformed regression models, and models that incorporated both clinical and physiological variables also outperformed models using only clinical variables across all performance metrics. Random forest using both clinical features and physiological traits achieved the best performance. In both regression and random forest models, central apnea index is found to be the most important feature in predicting residual AHI. For predicting CPAP pressure, there was no additional predictive value of physiological traits or random forest modeling. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings demonstrated that the combined use of clinical and physiological variables yields the most robust predictive models for residual AHI, with random forest models performing best. These findings support the notion that prediction of OSA therapy outcomes may be improved by more flexible models using machine learning, potentially in combination with physiology-based models.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study Objectives: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of choice for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however some people have residual respiratory events or require significantly higher CPAP pressure while on therapy. Our objective was to develop predictive models for CPAP outcomes and assess whether the inclusion of physiological traits enhances prediction. Methods: We constructed predictive models from baseline information for subsequent residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and optimal CPAP pressure. We compared models utilizing clinical variables with those incorporating both clinical and physiological factors. Furthermore, we assessed the performance of regression versus machine learning. All performances, including root mean square error (RSME), R-squared, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC), were evaluated using a five-fold cross validation with ten repeats. Results: For predicting residual AHI, random forest models outperformed regression models, and models that incorporated both clinical and physiological variables also outperformed models using only clinical variables across all performance metrics. Random forest using both clinical features and physiological traits achieved the best performance. In both regression and random forest models, central apnea index is found to be the most important feature in predicting residual AHI. For predicting CPAP pressure, there was no additional predictive value of physiological traits or random forest modeling. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that the combined use of clinical and physiological variables yields the most robust predictive models for residual AHI, with random forest models performing best. These findings support the notion that prediction of OSA therapy outcomes may be improved by more flexible models using machine learning, potentially in combination with physiology-based models.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.