Mean disease alleviation as a comprehensive metric for evaluating continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: establishing reference values and clinical significance.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.5664/jcsm.11592
Rohit Budhiraja, Salma Batool-Anwar, Stuart F Quan
{"title":"Mean disease alleviation as a comprehensive metric for evaluating continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: establishing reference values and clinical significance.","authors":"Rohit Budhiraja, Salma Batool-Anwar, Stuart F Quan","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea poses significant health risks, warranting effective treatment strategies. Continuous positive airway pressure therapy is widely used, but assessing treatment effectiveness remains complex. This study aimed to establish reference values for mean disease alleviation (MDA) in a large cohort treated with continuous positive airway pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study were analyzed. A total of 352 participants underwent 6 months of continuous positive airway pressure therapy, with adherence and efficacy monitored objectively. MDA, calculated as the product of treatment efficacy and percentage adherence, was assessed. Age and sex differences in MDA and its association with sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores > 10) were evaluated using logistic regression and linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean MDA in the 352 participants at 6 months was 53.85% ± 27.22%. Older participants demonstrated higher adherence and MDA compared to younger participants (58.2% ± 27.8% vs 51.1% ± 27.4%, <i>P</i> = .047). Despite higher efficacy, females demonstrated lower adherence, yielding MDA levels comparable to those of males. Participants achieving MDA ≥ 40% had significantly lower odds of sleepiness (odds ratio = 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.70; <i>P</i> = .001). In linear regression models, MDA was significantly associated with a reduction in Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores from baseline to 6 months (β = 0.146, <i>P</i> = .006), further supporting MDA as a robust predictor of treatment success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDA serves as a valuable metric for evaluating obstructive sleep apnea therapy outcomes, integrating both adherence and treatment efficacy. MDA ≥ 40% was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in sleepiness. Embracing MDA as a benchmark for obstructive sleep apnea therapy evaluation holds promise for optimizing personalized and effective obstructive sleep apnea management.</p><p><strong>Citation: </strong>Budhiraja R, Batool-Anwar S, Quan SF. Mean disease alleviation as a comprehensive metric for evaluating continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: establishing reference values and clinical significance. <i>J Clin Sleep Med.</i> 2025;21(6):973-982.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"973-982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea poses significant health risks, warranting effective treatment strategies. Continuous positive airway pressure therapy is widely used, but assessing treatment effectiveness remains complex. This study aimed to establish reference values for mean disease alleviation (MDA) in a large cohort treated with continuous positive airway pressure.

Methods: Data from the Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study were analyzed. A total of 352 participants underwent 6 months of continuous positive airway pressure therapy, with adherence and efficacy monitored objectively. MDA, calculated as the product of treatment efficacy and percentage adherence, was assessed. Age and sex differences in MDA and its association with sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores > 10) were evaluated using logistic regression and linear regression models.

Results: The mean MDA in the 352 participants at 6 months was 53.85% ± 27.22%. Older participants demonstrated higher adherence and MDA compared to younger participants (58.2% ± 27.8% vs 51.1% ± 27.4%, P = .047). Despite higher efficacy, females demonstrated lower adherence, yielding MDA levels comparable to those of males. Participants achieving MDA ≥ 40% had significantly lower odds of sleepiness (odds ratio = 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.70; P = .001). In linear regression models, MDA was significantly associated with a reduction in Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores from baseline to 6 months (β = 0.146, P = .006), further supporting MDA as a robust predictor of treatment success.

Conclusions: MDA serves as a valuable metric for evaluating obstructive sleep apnea therapy outcomes, integrating both adherence and treatment efficacy. MDA ≥ 40% was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in sleepiness. Embracing MDA as a benchmark for obstructive sleep apnea therapy evaluation holds promise for optimizing personalized and effective obstructive sleep apnea management.

Citation: Budhiraja R, Batool-Anwar S, Quan SF. Mean disease alleviation as a comprehensive metric for evaluating continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: establishing reference values and clinical significance. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(6):973-982.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平均病情缓解作为评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者持续气道正压治疗的综合指标:建立参考值和临床意义
研究目的:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)具有显著的健康风险,需要有效的治疗策略。虽然持续气道正压(CPAP)治疗被广泛应用,但评估治疗效果仍然很复杂。本研究旨在建立大型cpap治疗队列中平均疾病缓解(MDA)的参考值。方法:对呼吸暂停正压长期疗效研究(apple)的数据进行分析。352名参与者接受了6个月的CPAP治疗,客观地监测了依从性和疗效。评估MDA,计算为治疗疗效和依从性百分比的乘积。使用逻辑回归和线性回归模型评估MDA的年龄和性别差异及其与嗜睡的关系(Epworth嗜睡量表评分为bbb10)。结果:352名参与者6个月时的平均MDA为61.1%(±34.2%),MDA与依从性之间存在显著正相关(R=0.81)。结论:MDA是评估OSA治疗结果的有价值的指标,综合了依从性和治疗效果。MDA≥40%与嗜睡有临床意义的改善相关。采用MDA作为OSA治疗评估的基准有望优化个性化和有效的OSA管理并改善患者预后。未来的研究应侧重于优化MDA并探索其对长期结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
期刊最新文献
Perinatal stressors and sleep quality in adolescents: a Brazilian birth cohort study. Steam-assisted respiratory muscle training may improve sleep quality in mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea: a pilot polysomnography study. Risk of influenza and COVID-19 illness and pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: a TriNetX cohort with 5-year follow-up. Captured on camera: nocturnal self-observation as a driver of improved PAP adherence. Correction: AASM Public Safety Committee response to "Correcting melanin-dependent errors in pulse oximetry for more accurate assessments of sleep-disordered breathing".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1