Burn hypertrophy scarring assessment based on patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS).

Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01
M H Oley, M C Oley, F L F G Langi, E S Sinaga, D F Gunawan, M Faruk
{"title":"Burn hypertrophy scarring assessment based on patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS).","authors":"M H Oley, M C Oley, F L F G Langi, E S Sinaga, D F Gunawan, M Faruk","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertrophic burn scars can occur due to imbalances in the healing process and affect quality of life. They can be assessed with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). This is an assessment instrument with both a patient scale and an observer scale. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the POSAS score to measure the quality of scars in evaluating burns that produce scar tissue. It also aimed to determine similarities in the assessment of scar tissue using the POSAS score according to observers and patients. This cross-sectional study had a sample of 30 patients, including 19 women (63%). Assessments were performed before the initial treatment procedure and 1 and 6 months after. The post-incision scar tissue assessment results using the POSAS instrument were expressed as a score: 5-50 (observer), 6-60 (patient), or 11-110 (both total). The highest degree of burns was superficial-mid-dermal (20 patients; 67%). The POSAS assessment by doctors and patients tended to be the same and decreased at both months 1 and 6 after the treatment procedure. The mean total score was 51.3 ± 12.1 before treatment, 44.2 ± 9.5 at month 1, and 30.3 ± 5.9 at month 6. This study shows that in evaluating burns that produce hypertrophic scars, similarities exist in the POSAS score according to observers and patients. Precautions at the beginning of the observation will affect the POSAS score.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"37 4","pages":"312-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypertrophic burn scars can occur due to imbalances in the healing process and affect quality of life. They can be assessed with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). This is an assessment instrument with both a patient scale and an observer scale. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the POSAS score to measure the quality of scars in evaluating burns that produce scar tissue. It also aimed to determine similarities in the assessment of scar tissue using the POSAS score according to observers and patients. This cross-sectional study had a sample of 30 patients, including 19 women (63%). Assessments were performed before the initial treatment procedure and 1 and 6 months after. The post-incision scar tissue assessment results using the POSAS instrument were expressed as a score: 5-50 (observer), 6-60 (patient), or 11-110 (both total). The highest degree of burns was superficial-mid-dermal (20 patients; 67%). The POSAS assessment by doctors and patients tended to be the same and decreased at both months 1 and 6 after the treatment procedure. The mean total score was 51.3 ± 12.1 before treatment, 44.2 ± 9.5 at month 1, and 30.3 ± 5.9 at month 6. This study shows that in evaluating burns that produce hypertrophic scars, similarities exist in the POSAS score according to observers and patients. Precautions at the beginning of the observation will affect the POSAS score.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Epidemiology of burns in mayotte in 2022: an exhaustive study on a particular health area]. [Intraoperative iatrogenic thermal burn: case report and review of operating room fire prevention measures]. [The ambient air and arachis hypogaea (peanut) oil dressing in severe burns in children under 15 years of age at the regional hospital center of dédougou]. Burn hypertrophy scarring assessment based on patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS). Epidemiological trends for burn wound infections in 2020 in albania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1