US state death rates: Structural equation modeling of Big Five personality, socioeconomic status, and health risk factors.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1177/13591053241306564
Stewart Jh McCann
{"title":"US state death rates: Structural equation modeling of Big Five personality, socioeconomic status, and health risk factors.","authors":"Stewart Jh McCann","doi":"10.1177/13591053241306564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structural equation modeling (SEM) tested the <i>plausibility</i> of a <i>causal</i> model with neuroticism, openness to experience, socioeconomic status (SES), and race as predictors of a composite of six health risks and age-adjusted all-cause mortality in 2020 using the 48 contiguous American states as analytic units. In the final model, neuroticism, openness, and SES accounted for 80% of the health risk composite variance. These three variables and composite health risk accounted for 85% of the death rate variance. Neuroticism, openness, and SES had direct impacts on the health risk composite and indirect impacts on death rates through the health risk composite. SES and composite health risk also had direct impacts on death rates. Spatial autocorrelation and multicollinearity were not problematic. These SEM results underline the importance of state resident personality and SES in this context and support the <i>plausibility</i> of the <i>speculation</i> that the demonstrated relations may be <i>causal</i> in nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053241306564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241306564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structural equation modeling (SEM) tested the plausibility of a causal model with neuroticism, openness to experience, socioeconomic status (SES), and race as predictors of a composite of six health risks and age-adjusted all-cause mortality in 2020 using the 48 contiguous American states as analytic units. In the final model, neuroticism, openness, and SES accounted for 80% of the health risk composite variance. These three variables and composite health risk accounted for 85% of the death rate variance. Neuroticism, openness, and SES had direct impacts on the health risk composite and indirect impacts on death rates through the health risk composite. SES and composite health risk also had direct impacts on death rates. Spatial autocorrelation and multicollinearity were not problematic. These SEM results underline the importance of state resident personality and SES in this context and support the plausibility of the speculation that the demonstrated relations may be causal in nature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国各州死亡率:五大人格、社会经济地位和健康风险因素的结构方程模型。
结构方程模型(SEM)测试了因果模型的合理性,其中神经质、经验开放性、社会经济地位(SES)和种族作为2020年6种健康风险和年龄调整全因死亡率的综合预测因子,使用美国48个相邻州作为分析单位。在最终的模型中,神经质、开放性和SES占健康风险综合方差的80%。这三个变量和综合健康风险占死亡率方差的85%。神经质、开放性和社会经济地位对健康风险综合有直接影响,并通过健康风险综合间接影响死亡率。社会经济状况和综合健康风险对死亡率也有直接影响。空间自相关和多重共线性没有问题。这些SEM结果强调了在这种情况下,州居民人格和社会经济地位的重要性,并支持了这种推测的合理性,即所证明的关系在本质上可能是因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Does self-compassion buffer the impact of fear of COVID-19 on health-related quality of life for people living with HIV? Examining the dynamics of tobacco dependence and psychosocial influences: A random intercept-latent transition analysis. Self-objectification and depressive symptoms among young Chinese women: The roles of appearance comparison on social networking sites and regulatory emotional self-efficacy. Does fear of death mediate the link between intolerance of uncertainty and sleep quality? Insights from earthquake survivors in containers. Experiences of women with familial breast cancer history: A constructivist grounded theory study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1