{"title":"Clinicopathological comparison and cytokeratin-10 expression between Lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions.","authors":"Milena Duarte Moreira, Luanna Canal Pereira, Tahyna Duda Deps, Tânia Regina Grão Velloso, Letícia Nogueira da Gama-de-Souza, Liliana Aparecida Pimenta-Barros, Danielle Resende Camisasca","doi":"10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.106166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare clinicopathological features and immunostaining for cytokeratin-10 between oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective longitudinal study comparing lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions diagnosed at the Oral Pathological Anatomy Service that analyzed sociodemographic and clinicopathological data and CK10 expression. Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney tests or Student's t tests were used when appropriate, and p values < 0.05 were considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 lichen planus and 23 lichenoid lesions were included. There was an association between oral lichen planus and symptomatology (p = 0.031). The buccal mucosa was the most affected site in both groups: 20 patients (87.0 %) showed oral lichen planus, and 16 patients (69.6 %) oral lichenoid lesions. Bilateral (p < 0.001) striae (p = 0.004) are more characteristic of oral lichen planus. Oral lichen planus was associated with degeneration of the basal layer (p = 0.049) and with mild epithelial dysplasia (p < 0.001). Cytokeratin-10 immunostaining was similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A continuous follow-up is necessary to identify different patterns of malignant transformation between groups of lesions, as well as for comparisons with lesions with a higher malignant transformation rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":93882,"journal":{"name":"Archives of oral biology","volume":"171 ","pages":"106166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of oral biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.106166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to compare clinicopathological features and immunostaining for cytokeratin-10 between oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions.
Design: This was a retrospective longitudinal study comparing lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions diagnosed at the Oral Pathological Anatomy Service that analyzed sociodemographic and clinicopathological data and CK10 expression. Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney tests or Student's t tests were used when appropriate, and p values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results: A total of 23 lichen planus and 23 lichenoid lesions were included. There was an association between oral lichen planus and symptomatology (p = 0.031). The buccal mucosa was the most affected site in both groups: 20 patients (87.0 %) showed oral lichen planus, and 16 patients (69.6 %) oral lichenoid lesions. Bilateral (p < 0.001) striae (p = 0.004) are more characteristic of oral lichen planus. Oral lichen planus was associated with degeneration of the basal layer (p = 0.049) and with mild epithelial dysplasia (p < 0.001). Cytokeratin-10 immunostaining was similar between the groups.
Conclusions: A continuous follow-up is necessary to identify different patterns of malignant transformation between groups of lesions, as well as for comparisons with lesions with a higher malignant transformation rate.