Perceived Timeliness of Prior Authorization Approvals for Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19335
Jennifer M. Mellor, Peter J. Cunningham, Erin Britton, Andrew Mitchell, Sandra Dagenhart
{"title":"Perceived Timeliness of Prior Authorization Approvals for Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services","authors":"Jennifer M. Mellor,&nbsp;Peter J. Cunningham,&nbsp;Erin Britton,&nbsp;Andrew Mitchell,&nbsp;Sandra Dagenhart","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Because personal care and other home and community-based services (HCBS) are vulnerable to waste, fraud, and abuse, state Medicaid programs use prior authorization (PA) to improve program integrity [<span>1</span>]. However, little is known about Medicaid beneficiaries' experiences with PA for HCBS, even though physicians and consumers associate PA in general with delayed/denied care [<span>2, 3</span>].</p><p>We surveyed Virginia Medicaid beneficiaries to examine the timeliness of PA approval for in-home services. Administrative data suggest that only 3.9% of HCBS PAs in the state were denied since 2020; in the same period, 11.6% of authorizations took longer than 28 days [<span>4</span>]. We examined the association between PA approval delays and beneficiary characteristics, difficulty accessing HCBS, and health plan satisfaction. A novel feature of our survey is that all respondents were enrolled in the state's 1915(c) HCBS waiver and therefore had recent, documented functional and/or medical needs for HCBS, unlike representative surveys of consumers.</p><p>The sampling frame consisted of community-dwelling Virginia Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 6 months of continuous coverage in their Medicaid health plan and the HCBS waiver, and the same Medicare coverage in the prior 6 months (Methods/Table S1). Details on the survey were published previously [<span>5</span>].</p><p>Outcomes included: (1) a binary measure of whether, in the past 6 months, the respondent reported delay “in getting approval for services from [their] Medicaid health plan for … care and other in-home services and conveniences that help with daily activities” (e.g., personal care, adult day care, and skilled nursing care); (2) a binary measure of whether, in the past 6 months, the respondent reported “difficulty accessing care and other in-home services and conveniences that help with daily activities”; and (3) Medicaid health plan satisfaction ranging from 0 (“worst plan possible”) to 10 (“best plan possible”). Respondent demographic traits and eight measures capturing health, medical, and socioeconomic needs were defined from the survey (Methods S2).</p><p>We conducted univariate analyses and chi-square tests of differences in delayed PA approval for HCBS by respondent trait. Using multivariate regression, we estimated adjusted differences in delayed PA approval (logit models) and examined the association of delayed PA approval with difficulty accessing in-home care (logit models) and plan rating (OLS) controlling for respondent characteristics. We assessed statistical significance using two-tailed tests and alpha of 0.05.</p><p>A total of 2226 surveys of 6867 sent were returned, containing non-missing data on PA approvals for in-home services for 2136 respondents. One-third of respondents reported delayed PA approval for in-home services; delays did not differ by most demographic traits (Table S2). In univariate analysis, respondents with more health, medical, or socioeconomic needs were more likely to report delayed PA approval than those with less need (Table 1). For example, 40.8% of respondents with five or more chronic conditions reported delayed PA approval, compared to 31.0% of those with four or fewer conditions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001); respondents who had problems getting enough food were more likely to report delayed PA approvals than those who did not (41.6% vs. 28.1%; [<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]). Adjusting for demographic traits, all need measures, and other types of delays, respondents with several measures of high need were significantly more likely to report delayed PA approval for HCBS (Table S3).</p><p>Compared to respondents who did not report delayed PA approvals for in-home services, those who reported delays had higher odds of difficulty accessing in-home services (aOR = 6.74 [95% CI: 4.74–9.50], Table 2). Associations between difficulty accessing in-home services and delayed PA approval for medications or specialists were not statistically significant. Members reporting delayed PA approval for in-home services gave their health plans lower ratings (<i>β</i> = −0.21 [95% CI: −0.004 to −0.58], Table 2). Results were robust to sensitivity tests (Tables S4–S9).</p><p>Our novel findings on Medicaid HCBS add to evidence from prior national studies that PA burden is generally greater for those with more health needs and that PA delays/denials are associated with reduced access and trust in the healthcare system [<span>3, 6, 7</span>]. While reports of delays may reflect respondents' unobserved traits (e.g., impatience), reporting other types of PA delays was not associated with difficulty accessing in-home services. Limitations include focusing on one state; like other surveys, delays were subjective and length was not defined [<span>3</span>], and persons experiencing delays may have been more likely to respond.</p><p>We provide new cross-sectional evidence that delayed PA approval for Medicaid HCBS was associated with lower access and health plan ratings. Future work should explore whether access and satisfaction improve following regulations to lessen delays [<span>8</span>] and whether delays can be reduced by streamlining communication between providers, care coordinators, and plans, improving models of care, or using concurrent authorization [<span>9, 10</span>].</p><p>All authors meet the criteria for authorship stated in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Jennifer M. Mellor designed the study and made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data, conducted the analysis and interpreted the data, drafted the article, and approved the final version to be published. Peter J. Cunningham and Erin Britton made substantial contributions to the acquisition of the data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published. Andrew Mitchell and Sandra Dagenhart made substantial contributions to the analysis and interpretation of the data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 5","pages":"1615-1617"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19335","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19335","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because personal care and other home and community-based services (HCBS) are vulnerable to waste, fraud, and abuse, state Medicaid programs use prior authorization (PA) to improve program integrity [1]. However, little is known about Medicaid beneficiaries' experiences with PA for HCBS, even though physicians and consumers associate PA in general with delayed/denied care [2, 3].

We surveyed Virginia Medicaid beneficiaries to examine the timeliness of PA approval for in-home services. Administrative data suggest that only 3.9% of HCBS PAs in the state were denied since 2020; in the same period, 11.6% of authorizations took longer than 28 days [4]. We examined the association between PA approval delays and beneficiary characteristics, difficulty accessing HCBS, and health plan satisfaction. A novel feature of our survey is that all respondents were enrolled in the state's 1915(c) HCBS waiver and therefore had recent, documented functional and/or medical needs for HCBS, unlike representative surveys of consumers.

The sampling frame consisted of community-dwelling Virginia Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 6 months of continuous coverage in their Medicaid health plan and the HCBS waiver, and the same Medicare coverage in the prior 6 months (Methods/Table S1). Details on the survey were published previously [5].

Outcomes included: (1) a binary measure of whether, in the past 6 months, the respondent reported delay “in getting approval for services from [their] Medicaid health plan for … care and other in-home services and conveniences that help with daily activities” (e.g., personal care, adult day care, and skilled nursing care); (2) a binary measure of whether, in the past 6 months, the respondent reported “difficulty accessing care and other in-home services and conveniences that help with daily activities”; and (3) Medicaid health plan satisfaction ranging from 0 (“worst plan possible”) to 10 (“best plan possible”). Respondent demographic traits and eight measures capturing health, medical, and socioeconomic needs were defined from the survey (Methods S2).

We conducted univariate analyses and chi-square tests of differences in delayed PA approval for HCBS by respondent trait. Using multivariate regression, we estimated adjusted differences in delayed PA approval (logit models) and examined the association of delayed PA approval with difficulty accessing in-home care (logit models) and plan rating (OLS) controlling for respondent characteristics. We assessed statistical significance using two-tailed tests and alpha of 0.05.

A total of 2226 surveys of 6867 sent were returned, containing non-missing data on PA approvals for in-home services for 2136 respondents. One-third of respondents reported delayed PA approval for in-home services; delays did not differ by most demographic traits (Table S2). In univariate analysis, respondents with more health, medical, or socioeconomic needs were more likely to report delayed PA approval than those with less need (Table 1). For example, 40.8% of respondents with five or more chronic conditions reported delayed PA approval, compared to 31.0% of those with four or fewer conditions (p < 0.001); respondents who had problems getting enough food were more likely to report delayed PA approvals than those who did not (41.6% vs. 28.1%; [p < 0.001]). Adjusting for demographic traits, all need measures, and other types of delays, respondents with several measures of high need were significantly more likely to report delayed PA approval for HCBS (Table S3).

Compared to respondents who did not report delayed PA approvals for in-home services, those who reported delays had higher odds of difficulty accessing in-home services (aOR = 6.74 [95% CI: 4.74–9.50], Table 2). Associations between difficulty accessing in-home services and delayed PA approval for medications or specialists were not statistically significant. Members reporting delayed PA approval for in-home services gave their health plans lower ratings (β = −0.21 [95% CI: −0.004 to −0.58], Table 2). Results were robust to sensitivity tests (Tables S4–S9).

Our novel findings on Medicaid HCBS add to evidence from prior national studies that PA burden is generally greater for those with more health needs and that PA delays/denials are associated with reduced access and trust in the healthcare system [3, 6, 7]. While reports of delays may reflect respondents' unobserved traits (e.g., impatience), reporting other types of PA delays was not associated with difficulty accessing in-home services. Limitations include focusing on one state; like other surveys, delays were subjective and length was not defined [3], and persons experiencing delays may have been more likely to respond.

We provide new cross-sectional evidence that delayed PA approval for Medicaid HCBS was associated with lower access and health plan ratings. Future work should explore whether access and satisfaction improve following regulations to lessen delays [8] and whether delays can be reduced by streamlining communication between providers, care coordinators, and plans, improving models of care, or using concurrent authorization [9, 10].

All authors meet the criteria for authorship stated in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Jennifer M. Mellor designed the study and made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data, conducted the analysis and interpreted the data, drafted the article, and approved the final version to be published. Peter J. Cunningham and Erin Britton made substantial contributions to the acquisition of the data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published. Andrew Mitchell and Sandra Dagenhart made substantial contributions to the analysis and interpretation of the data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对医疗补助家庭和社区服务预先授权批准及时性的看法。
由于个人护理和其他家庭和社区服务(HCBS)容易受到浪费、欺诈和滥用的影响,州医疗补助计划使用事先授权(PA)来提高计划的完整性。然而,尽管医生和消费者通常将PA与延迟/拒绝护理联系起来,但对于医疗补助受益人在HCBS中使用PA的经历知之甚少[2,3]。我们调查了弗吉尼亚州医疗补助受益人,以检查PA批准家庭服务的及时性。行政数据显示,自2020年以来,该州只有3.9%的HCBS PAs被拒绝;在同一时期,11.6%的授权时间超过28天。我们研究了PA批准延迟与受益人特征、难以获得HCBS和健康计划满意度之间的关系。本调查的一个新特点是,与代表性消费者调查不同,所有受访者都参加了该州1915年(c) HCBS豁免,因此最近对HCBS有记录的功能和/或医疗需求。抽样框架包括居住在弗吉尼亚州社区的医疗补助受益人,他们的医疗补助健康计划和HCBS豁免至少连续覆盖6个月,并且在之前的6个月内具有相同的医疗保险覆盖范围(方法/表S1)。调查的细节已于2010年10月1日公布。结果包括:(1)在过去6个月中,被调查对象是否报告延迟“从[他们的]医疗补助计划获得服务批准……护理和其他有助于日常活动的家庭服务和便利”(例如,个人护理、成人日托和熟练护理);(2)一项二元衡量指标,衡量在过去6个月内,被访者是否表示“难以获得护理和其他有助于日常活动的家庭服务和便利”;(3)医疗补助计划满意度从0(“可能的最差计划”)到10(“可能的最佳计划”)不等。从调查中定义了受访者的人口特征和捕获健康、医疗和社会经济需求的八项措施(方法S2)。我们进行了单变量分析和卡方检验,分析了被调查者特质对HCBS延迟PA批准的差异。使用多元回归,我们估计延迟PA批准(logit模型)的调整差异,并检查延迟PA批准与难以获得家庭护理(logit模型)和计划评级(OLS)之间的关系。采用双尾检验,alpha值为0.05。共发送了2226份调查问卷,共计6867份,其中包含2136名受访者的PA批准家庭服务的非缺失数据。三分之一的受访者表示,家庭服务的审批被推迟;延迟在大多数人口特征上没有差异(表S2)。在单变量分析中,有更多健康、医疗或社会经济需求的受访者比那些需求较少的受访者更有可能报告延迟PA批准(表1)。例如,40.8%患有五种或更多慢性疾病的受访者报告PA批准延迟,而患有四种或更少慢性疾病的受访者为31.0% (p &lt; 0.001);在获得足够食物方面有问题的受访者比没有问题的受访者更有可能报告延迟的PA批准(41.6%对28.1%;[p &lt; 0.001])。根据人口统计学特征、所有需求措施和其他类型的延迟进行调整后,具有几种高需求措施的受访者更有可能报告HCBS的PA批准延迟(表S3)。与没有报告延迟PA批准家庭服务的受访者相比,报告延迟的受访者在获得家庭服务方面有更高的困难几率(aOR = 6.74 [95% CI: 4.74-9.50],表2)。难以获得家庭服务与延迟PA批准药物或专家之间的关联没有统计学意义。报告延迟PA批准家庭服务的成员对其健康计划的评分较低(β = - 0.21 [95% CI: - 0.004至- 0.58],表2)。结果对敏感性测试具有稳健性(表S4-S9)。我们关于医疗补助HCBS的新发现为之前的全国性研究提供了证据,即对于那些有更多健康需求的人来说,PA负担通常更大,PA延迟/拒绝与医疗保健系统的获取和信任减少有关[3,6,7]。虽然延迟的报告可能反映了受访者未被观察到的特征(例如,不耐烦),但报告其他类型的PA延迟与难以获得家庭服务无关。局限包括只关注一种状态;像其他调查一样,延迟是主观的,长度没有定义,经历延迟的人可能更有可能做出回应。我们提供了新的横截面证据,证明医疗补助HCBS的PA批准延迟与较低的获取和健康计划评级有关。 未来的工作应探讨是否可获得性和满意度在遵守法规后得到改善以减少延误bbb,以及是否可以通过简化提供者、护理协调员和计划之间的沟通、改进护理模式或使用并发授权来减少延误[9,10]。所有作者均符合《生物医学期刊投稿统一要求》中规定的作者资格标准。Jennifer M. Mellor设计了这项研究,并对数据的获取做出了重大贡献,对数据进行了分析和解释,起草了文章,并批准了最终版本的发表。Peter J. Cunningham和Erin Britton对数据的获取做出了实质性的贡献,对文章的重要知识内容进行了批判性的修改,并最终批准了将要发表的版本。安德鲁·米切尔(Andrew Mitchell)和桑德拉·达格哈特(Sandra Dagenhart)对数据的分析和解释做出了重大贡献,对文章的重要知识内容进行了批判性修改,并最终批准了即将发表的版本。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
NOTICES Issue Information Cover A Thank You to JAGS Reviewers The Role of Brain Structure in Explaining Physical Functioning in Male Veterans With Impaired Kidney Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1