Jennifer M. Mellor, Peter J. Cunningham, Erin Britton, Andrew Mitchell, Sandra Dagenhart
{"title":"Perceived Timeliness of Prior Authorization Approvals for Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services","authors":"Jennifer M. Mellor, Peter J. Cunningham, Erin Britton, Andrew Mitchell, Sandra Dagenhart","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Because personal care and other home and community-based services (HCBS) are vulnerable to waste, fraud, and abuse, state Medicaid programs use prior authorization (PA) to improve program integrity [<span>1</span>]. However, little is known about Medicaid beneficiaries' experiences with PA for HCBS, even though physicians and consumers associate PA in general with delayed/denied care [<span>2, 3</span>].</p><p>We surveyed Virginia Medicaid beneficiaries to examine the timeliness of PA approval for in-home services. Administrative data suggest that only 3.9% of HCBS PAs in the state were denied since 2020; in the same period, 11.6% of authorizations took longer than 28 days [<span>4</span>]. We examined the association between PA approval delays and beneficiary characteristics, difficulty accessing HCBS, and health plan satisfaction. A novel feature of our survey is that all respondents were enrolled in the state's 1915(c) HCBS waiver and therefore had recent, documented functional and/or medical needs for HCBS, unlike representative surveys of consumers.</p><p>The sampling frame consisted of community-dwelling Virginia Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 6 months of continuous coverage in their Medicaid health plan and the HCBS waiver, and the same Medicare coverage in the prior 6 months (Methods/Table S1). Details on the survey were published previously [<span>5</span>].</p><p>Outcomes included: (1) a binary measure of whether, in the past 6 months, the respondent reported delay “in getting approval for services from [their] Medicaid health plan for … care and other in-home services and conveniences that help with daily activities” (e.g., personal care, adult day care, and skilled nursing care); (2) a binary measure of whether, in the past 6 months, the respondent reported “difficulty accessing care and other in-home services and conveniences that help with daily activities”; and (3) Medicaid health plan satisfaction ranging from 0 (“worst plan possible”) to 10 (“best plan possible”). Respondent demographic traits and eight measures capturing health, medical, and socioeconomic needs were defined from the survey (Methods S2).</p><p>We conducted univariate analyses and chi-square tests of differences in delayed PA approval for HCBS by respondent trait. Using multivariate regression, we estimated adjusted differences in delayed PA approval (logit models) and examined the association of delayed PA approval with difficulty accessing in-home care (logit models) and plan rating (OLS) controlling for respondent characteristics. We assessed statistical significance using two-tailed tests and alpha of 0.05.</p><p>A total of 2226 surveys of 6867 sent were returned, containing non-missing data on PA approvals for in-home services for 2136 respondents. One-third of respondents reported delayed PA approval for in-home services; delays did not differ by most demographic traits (Table S2). In univariate analysis, respondents with more health, medical, or socioeconomic needs were more likely to report delayed PA approval than those with less need (Table 1). For example, 40.8% of respondents with five or more chronic conditions reported delayed PA approval, compared to 31.0% of those with four or fewer conditions (<i>p</i> < 0.001); respondents who had problems getting enough food were more likely to report delayed PA approvals than those who did not (41.6% vs. 28.1%; [<i>p</i> < 0.001]). Adjusting for demographic traits, all need measures, and other types of delays, respondents with several measures of high need were significantly more likely to report delayed PA approval for HCBS (Table S3).</p><p>Compared to respondents who did not report delayed PA approvals for in-home services, those who reported delays had higher odds of difficulty accessing in-home services (aOR = 6.74 [95% CI: 4.74–9.50], Table 2). Associations between difficulty accessing in-home services and delayed PA approval for medications or specialists were not statistically significant. Members reporting delayed PA approval for in-home services gave their health plans lower ratings (<i>β</i> = −0.21 [95% CI: −0.004 to −0.58], Table 2). Results were robust to sensitivity tests (Tables S4–S9).</p><p>Our novel findings on Medicaid HCBS add to evidence from prior national studies that PA burden is generally greater for those with more health needs and that PA delays/denials are associated with reduced access and trust in the healthcare system [<span>3, 6, 7</span>]. While reports of delays may reflect respondents' unobserved traits (e.g., impatience), reporting other types of PA delays was not associated with difficulty accessing in-home services. Limitations include focusing on one state; like other surveys, delays were subjective and length was not defined [<span>3</span>], and persons experiencing delays may have been more likely to respond.</p><p>We provide new cross-sectional evidence that delayed PA approval for Medicaid HCBS was associated with lower access and health plan ratings. Future work should explore whether access and satisfaction improve following regulations to lessen delays [<span>8</span>] and whether delays can be reduced by streamlining communication between providers, care coordinators, and plans, improving models of care, or using concurrent authorization [<span>9, 10</span>].</p><p>All authors meet the criteria for authorship stated in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Jennifer M. Mellor designed the study and made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data, conducted the analysis and interpreted the data, drafted the article, and approved the final version to be published. Peter J. Cunningham and Erin Britton made substantial contributions to the acquisition of the data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published. Andrew Mitchell and Sandra Dagenhart made substantial contributions to the analysis and interpretation of the data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 5","pages":"1615-1617"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19335","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19335","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Because personal care and other home and community-based services (HCBS) are vulnerable to waste, fraud, and abuse, state Medicaid programs use prior authorization (PA) to improve program integrity [1]. However, little is known about Medicaid beneficiaries' experiences with PA for HCBS, even though physicians and consumers associate PA in general with delayed/denied care [2, 3].
We surveyed Virginia Medicaid beneficiaries to examine the timeliness of PA approval for in-home services. Administrative data suggest that only 3.9% of HCBS PAs in the state were denied since 2020; in the same period, 11.6% of authorizations took longer than 28 days [4]. We examined the association between PA approval delays and beneficiary characteristics, difficulty accessing HCBS, and health plan satisfaction. A novel feature of our survey is that all respondents were enrolled in the state's 1915(c) HCBS waiver and therefore had recent, documented functional and/or medical needs for HCBS, unlike representative surveys of consumers.
The sampling frame consisted of community-dwelling Virginia Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 6 months of continuous coverage in their Medicaid health plan and the HCBS waiver, and the same Medicare coverage in the prior 6 months (Methods/Table S1). Details on the survey were published previously [5].
Outcomes included: (1) a binary measure of whether, in the past 6 months, the respondent reported delay “in getting approval for services from [their] Medicaid health plan for … care and other in-home services and conveniences that help with daily activities” (e.g., personal care, adult day care, and skilled nursing care); (2) a binary measure of whether, in the past 6 months, the respondent reported “difficulty accessing care and other in-home services and conveniences that help with daily activities”; and (3) Medicaid health plan satisfaction ranging from 0 (“worst plan possible”) to 10 (“best plan possible”). Respondent demographic traits and eight measures capturing health, medical, and socioeconomic needs were defined from the survey (Methods S2).
We conducted univariate analyses and chi-square tests of differences in delayed PA approval for HCBS by respondent trait. Using multivariate regression, we estimated adjusted differences in delayed PA approval (logit models) and examined the association of delayed PA approval with difficulty accessing in-home care (logit models) and plan rating (OLS) controlling for respondent characteristics. We assessed statistical significance using two-tailed tests and alpha of 0.05.
A total of 2226 surveys of 6867 sent were returned, containing non-missing data on PA approvals for in-home services for 2136 respondents. One-third of respondents reported delayed PA approval for in-home services; delays did not differ by most demographic traits (Table S2). In univariate analysis, respondents with more health, medical, or socioeconomic needs were more likely to report delayed PA approval than those with less need (Table 1). For example, 40.8% of respondents with five or more chronic conditions reported delayed PA approval, compared to 31.0% of those with four or fewer conditions (p < 0.001); respondents who had problems getting enough food were more likely to report delayed PA approvals than those who did not (41.6% vs. 28.1%; [p < 0.001]). Adjusting for demographic traits, all need measures, and other types of delays, respondents with several measures of high need were significantly more likely to report delayed PA approval for HCBS (Table S3).
Compared to respondents who did not report delayed PA approvals for in-home services, those who reported delays had higher odds of difficulty accessing in-home services (aOR = 6.74 [95% CI: 4.74–9.50], Table 2). Associations between difficulty accessing in-home services and delayed PA approval for medications or specialists were not statistically significant. Members reporting delayed PA approval for in-home services gave their health plans lower ratings (β = −0.21 [95% CI: −0.004 to −0.58], Table 2). Results were robust to sensitivity tests (Tables S4–S9).
Our novel findings on Medicaid HCBS add to evidence from prior national studies that PA burden is generally greater for those with more health needs and that PA delays/denials are associated with reduced access and trust in the healthcare system [3, 6, 7]. While reports of delays may reflect respondents' unobserved traits (e.g., impatience), reporting other types of PA delays was not associated with difficulty accessing in-home services. Limitations include focusing on one state; like other surveys, delays were subjective and length was not defined [3], and persons experiencing delays may have been more likely to respond.
We provide new cross-sectional evidence that delayed PA approval for Medicaid HCBS was associated with lower access and health plan ratings. Future work should explore whether access and satisfaction improve following regulations to lessen delays [8] and whether delays can be reduced by streamlining communication between providers, care coordinators, and plans, improving models of care, or using concurrent authorization [9, 10].
All authors meet the criteria for authorship stated in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Jennifer M. Mellor designed the study and made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data, conducted the analysis and interpreted the data, drafted the article, and approved the final version to be published. Peter J. Cunningham and Erin Britton made substantial contributions to the acquisition of the data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published. Andrew Mitchell and Sandra Dagenhart made substantial contributions to the analysis and interpretation of the data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.