Structural Variation Interpretation in the Genome Sequencing Era: Lessons from Cytogenetics.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1093/clinchem/hvae186
Lucilla Pizzo, M Katharine Rudd
{"title":"Structural Variation Interpretation in the Genome Sequencing Era: Lessons from Cytogenetics.","authors":"Lucilla Pizzo, M Katharine Rudd","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Structural variation (SV), defined as balanced and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements >1 kb, is a major contributor to germline and neoplastic disease. Large variants have historically been evaluated by chromosome analysis and now are commonly recognized by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). The increasing application of genome sequencing (GS) in the clinic and the relatively high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in sick newborns and children highlights the need for accurate SV interpretation and reporting. In this review, we describe SV patterns of common cytogenetic abnormalities for laboratorians who review GS data.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>GS has the potential to detect diverse chromosomal abnormalities and sequence breakpoint junctions to clarify variant structure. No single GS analysis pipeline can detect all SV, and visualization of sequence data is crucial to recognize specific patterns. Here we describe genomic signatures of translocations, inverted duplications adjacent to terminal deletions, recombinant chromosomes, marker chromosomes, ring chromosomes, isodicentric and isochromosomes, and mosaic aneuploidy. Distinguishing these more complex abnormalities from simple deletions and duplications is critical for phenotypic interpretation and recurrence risk recommendations.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Unlike single-nucleotide variant calling, identification of chromosome rearrangements by GS requires further processing and multiple callers. SV databases have caveats and limitations depending on the platform (CMA vs sequencing) and resolution (exome vs genome). In the rapidly evolving era of clinical genomics, where a single test can identify both sequence and structural variants, optimal patient care stems from the integration of molecular and cytogenetic expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"71 1","pages":"119-128"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Structural variation (SV), defined as balanced and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements >1 kb, is a major contributor to germline and neoplastic disease. Large variants have historically been evaluated by chromosome analysis and now are commonly recognized by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). The increasing application of genome sequencing (GS) in the clinic and the relatively high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in sick newborns and children highlights the need for accurate SV interpretation and reporting. In this review, we describe SV patterns of common cytogenetic abnormalities for laboratorians who review GS data.

Content: GS has the potential to detect diverse chromosomal abnormalities and sequence breakpoint junctions to clarify variant structure. No single GS analysis pipeline can detect all SV, and visualization of sequence data is crucial to recognize specific patterns. Here we describe genomic signatures of translocations, inverted duplications adjacent to terminal deletions, recombinant chromosomes, marker chromosomes, ring chromosomes, isodicentric and isochromosomes, and mosaic aneuploidy. Distinguishing these more complex abnormalities from simple deletions and duplications is critical for phenotypic interpretation and recurrence risk recommendations.

Summary: Unlike single-nucleotide variant calling, identification of chromosome rearrangements by GS requires further processing and multiple callers. SV databases have caveats and limitations depending on the platform (CMA vs sequencing) and resolution (exome vs genome). In the rapidly evolving era of clinical genomics, where a single test can identify both sequence and structural variants, optimal patient care stems from the integration of molecular and cytogenetic expertise.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Structural Variation Interpretation in the Genome Sequencing Era: Lessons from Cytogenetics. Virus Evolution in Prolonged Infections of Immunocompromised Individuals. Integrative Assessment of Total and Intact HIV-1 Reservoir by a 5-Region Multiplexed Rainbow DNA Digital PCR Assay. Liquid Biopsy Detection of a TP53 Variant in a "Disease-Free" Pediatric Patient with a History of TP53-Mutant Adrenocortical Carcinoma. Challenges and Opportunities in Training Cytogenetics Laboratory Directors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1