The economic burden of diabetes in spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08631-w
Gonzalo Mariscal, Rick C Sasso, John E O'Toole, Christopher D Chaput, Michael P Steinmetz, Paul M Arnold, Christopher D Witiw, W Bradley Jacobs, James S Harrop
{"title":"The economic burden of diabetes in spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gonzalo Mariscal, Rick C Sasso, John E O'Toole, Christopher D Chaput, Michael P Steinmetz, Paul M Arnold, Christopher D Witiw, W Bradley Jacobs, James S Harrop","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08631-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed at comparing the costs of spinal fusion surgery between patients with and without diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of four databases was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed on comparative studies examining diabetic versus non-diabetic adults undergoing cervical/lumbar fusion in terms of cost. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model in the presence of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies were included in this meta-analysis. Standardized costs were significantly higher in the diabetic group (SMD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.03, p < 0.05). The excess cost per diabetic patient undergoing spinal fusion surgery was estimated to be $2,492 (95% CI: $1,620 to $3,363). The length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer in the diabetes group (MD 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.60, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in intensive care unit admission between the groups (OR 4.15, 95% CI 0.55 to 31.40, p > 0.05). Reoperation showed no significant differences between the groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.35, p > 0.05). However, 30-day and 90-day readmissions were significantly higher in the diabetes group: (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.62, p < 0.05) and (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.68, p < 0.001), respectively. Non-routine or non-home discharge was also significantly higher in the diabetes group (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.13, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with diabetes undergoing spinal fusion surgery had increased costs, prolonged LOS, increased 30-day/90-day readmission rates, and more frequent non-routine discharges.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08631-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed at comparing the costs of spinal fusion surgery between patients with and without diabetes.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of four databases was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed on comparative studies examining diabetic versus non-diabetic adults undergoing cervical/lumbar fusion in terms of cost. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model in the presence of heterogeneity.

Results: Twenty-two studies were included in this meta-analysis. Standardized costs were significantly higher in the diabetic group (SMD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.03, p < 0.05). The excess cost per diabetic patient undergoing spinal fusion surgery was estimated to be $2,492 (95% CI: $1,620 to $3,363). The length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer in the diabetes group (MD 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.60, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in intensive care unit admission between the groups (OR 4.15, 95% CI 0.55 to 31.40, p > 0.05). Reoperation showed no significant differences between the groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.35, p > 0.05). However, 30-day and 90-day readmissions were significantly higher in the diabetes group: (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.62, p < 0.05) and (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.68, p < 0.001), respectively. Non-routine or non-home discharge was also significantly higher in the diabetes group (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.13, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients with diabetes undergoing spinal fusion surgery had increased costs, prolonged LOS, increased 30-day/90-day readmission rates, and more frequent non-routine discharges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:本研究旨在比较糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的脊柱融合手术费用:按照 PRISMA 指南,对四个数据库进行了系统检索。对接受颈椎/腰椎融合术的糖尿病与非糖尿病成人患者的成本比较研究进行了荟萃分析。异质性采用 I2 检验进行评估。在存在异质性的情况下,采用随机效应模型计算标准化均值差异(SMD)和带95%置信区间(CI)的几率比(OR):本次荟萃分析共纳入 22 项研究。糖尿病组的标准化费用明显更高(SMD 0.02,95% CI 0.01 至 0.03,P 0.05)。再手术在两组间无明显差异(OR 1.14,95% CI 0.96 至 1.35,P > 0.05)。然而,糖尿病组患者的30天和90天再入院率明显更高:(OR 1.42,95% CI 1.24至1.62,P 结论:糖尿病组患者的30天和90天再入院率明显更高:接受脊柱融合手术的糖尿病患者费用增加,住院时间延长,30天/90天再入院率增加,非正常出院更频繁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Can surface topography reliably determine the Rigo classification system? A comparative study of two full-endoscopic foraminoplasty techniques for lumbar disc herniation. Impact of skeletal muscle mass of the trunk and extremities on standing spine parameters before and after surgery for adult spinal deformity with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Structural changes of muscle spindles in the multifidus muscle after intervertebral disk injury are resolved by targeted muscle activation. The aortic-vertebral distance is more associated with axial plane deformities than coronal and sagittal deformities in idiopathic scoliosis patients of Lenke types I and II.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1