Risk of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) and Proton Pump Inhibitor Users Compared with NSAID-Only Users: A Common Data Model Analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gut and Liver Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.5009/gnl240247
Moonhyung Lee, Myoungsuk Kim, Jae Myung Cha
{"title":"Risk of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) and Proton Pump Inhibitor Users Compared with NSAID-Only Users: A Common Data Model Analysis.","authors":"Moonhyung Lee, Myoungsuk Kim, Jae Myung Cha","doi":"10.5009/gnl240247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Recent studies have shown an increased risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who use both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We analyzed the risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and compared this risk between NSAID+PPI users and NSAID-only users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, observational study, data from five hospitals were analyzed using a common data model to determine the risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and compare this risk between NSAID+PPI users (target cohort) and NSAID-only users (comparative cohort). Cox proportional hazard models and the Kaplan-Meier estimations were employed after extensive propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 24,530 individuals in the target cohort and 57,264 in the comparative cohort, 8,728 propensity score-matched pairs were analyzed. The risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly higher in NSAID+PPI users than in NSAID-only users (hazard ratio [HR], 2.843; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.998 to 4.044; p<0.001). Similar findings were also noted in elderly patients >65 years (HR, 2.737), males (HR, 2.963), and females (HR, 3.221). However, the risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding was comparable between NSAID+mucoprotective agent users and NSAID-only users (HR, 2.057; 95% CI, 0.714 to 5.924; p=0.172).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in NSAID+PPI users than in NSAID-only users. However, the risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding was comparable between NSAID+mucoprotective agent users and NSAID-only users.</p>","PeriodicalId":12885,"journal":{"name":"Gut and Liver","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut and Liver","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl240247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Recent studies have shown an increased risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who use both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We analyzed the risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and compared this risk between NSAID+PPI users and NSAID-only users.

Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, data from five hospitals were analyzed using a common data model to determine the risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and compare this risk between NSAID+PPI users (target cohort) and NSAID-only users (comparative cohort). Cox proportional hazard models and the Kaplan-Meier estimations were employed after extensive propensity score matching.

Results: Among 24,530 individuals in the target cohort and 57,264 in the comparative cohort, 8,728 propensity score-matched pairs were analyzed. The risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly higher in NSAID+PPI users than in NSAID-only users (hazard ratio [HR], 2.843; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.998 to 4.044; p<0.001). Similar findings were also noted in elderly patients >65 years (HR, 2.737), males (HR, 2.963), and females (HR, 3.221). However, the risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding was comparable between NSAID+mucoprotective agent users and NSAID-only users (HR, 2.057; 95% CI, 0.714 to 5.924; p=0.172).

Conclusions: The risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in NSAID+PPI users than in NSAID-only users. However, the risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding was comparable between NSAID+mucoprotective agent users and NSAID-only users.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与仅使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和质子泵抑制剂的患者相比,使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和质子泵抑制剂的患者下消化道出血的风险:一个共同的数据模型分析。
背景/目的:最近的研究表明,同时使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的患者发生下消化道出血的风险增加。我们分析了下消化道出血的风险,并比较了非甾体抗炎药+PPI使用者和仅使用非甾体抗炎药使用者之间的风险。方法:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,使用通用数据模型分析来自五家医院的数据,以确定下消化道出血的风险,并比较NSAID+PPI使用者(目标队列)和仅NSAID使用者(比较队列)之间的风险。在广泛的倾向评分匹配后,采用Cox比例风险模型和Kaplan-Meier估计。结果:在目标队列的24,530名个体和比较队列的57,264名个体中,分析了8,728对倾向评分匹配对。使用NSAID+PPI的患者发生下消化道出血的风险显著高于仅使用NSAID的患者(风险比[HR], 2.843;95%置信区间[CI], 1.998 ~ 4.044;p65岁(HR, 2.737),男性(HR, 2.963),女性(HR, 3.221)。然而,使用非甾体抗炎药+粘膜保护剂和仅使用非甾体抗炎药的患者下消化道出血的风险相当(HR, 2.057;95% CI, 0.714 ~ 5.924;p = 0.172)。结论:使用NSAID+PPI的患者发生下消化道出血的风险高于仅使用NSAID的患者。然而,使用非甾体抗炎药+粘膜保护剂和仅使用非甾体抗炎药的患者发生下消化道出血的风险是相当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gut and Liver
Gut and Liver 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut and Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. Gut and Liver is jointly owned and operated by 8 affiliated societies in the field of gastroenterology, namely: the Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors. Association of Intensive Endoscopic Burden with Esophageal Cancer Detection: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Correlation between White Globe Appearance and Clinicopathologic Characteristics in Early Gastric Cancer. Comparing 1-L and 2-L Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1