Reactance as a Persuasive Strategy: How Health Communication Can Harness Anger to Leverage Behavior Change.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2446369
Philipp Sprengholz, Dela Bührig
{"title":"Reactance as a Persuasive Strategy: How Health Communication Can Harness Anger to Leverage Behavior Change.","authors":"Philipp Sprengholz, Dela Bührig","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2446369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to psychological reactance theory, individuals who perceive a threat to or loss of valued behavior will experience reactance - an amalgam of anger and negative cognitions that motivates an effort to regain behavioral freedom. The limited effects of health communication interventions have often been attributed to psychological reactance, and previous research has tended to focus on how to design health messages that mitigate this phenomenon. However, the motivational nature of reactance suggests that it might also be used to promote health. When people learn that external influences circumvent a positive health behavior, this information may elicit reactance, motivating them to exhibit that behavior. This idea found support in the results of a preregistered experiment (<i>N</i> = 358), showing that participants were more willing to reduce meat consumption when they experienced reactance after reading about how the food industry undermines self-determined dietary decisions. The findings indicate that harnessing reactance to leverage behavior change may offer a promising alternative to established communication strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"2200-2206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2446369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to psychological reactance theory, individuals who perceive a threat to or loss of valued behavior will experience reactance - an amalgam of anger and negative cognitions that motivates an effort to regain behavioral freedom. The limited effects of health communication interventions have often been attributed to psychological reactance, and previous research has tended to focus on how to design health messages that mitigate this phenomenon. However, the motivational nature of reactance suggests that it might also be used to promote health. When people learn that external influences circumvent a positive health behavior, this information may elicit reactance, motivating them to exhibit that behavior. This idea found support in the results of a preregistered experiment (N = 358), showing that participants were more willing to reduce meat consumption when they experienced reactance after reading about how the food industry undermines self-determined dietary decisions. The findings indicate that harnessing reactance to leverage behavior change may offer a promising alternative to established communication strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗拒作为一种有说服力的策略:健康沟通如何利用愤怒来影响行为改变。
根据心理抗拒理论,个人如果感觉到有价值的行为受到威胁或丧失,就会经历抗拒——一种愤怒和消极认知的混合体,它会激发人们努力重新获得行为自由。健康传播干预措施的有限效果通常归因于心理抗拒,而以前的研究往往侧重于如何设计健康信息以减轻这种现象。然而,抗拒的动机性质表明,它也可能被用来促进健康。当人们了解到外部影响会阻碍积极的健康行为时,这一信息可能会引起抗拒,促使他们表现出这种行为。这一观点在一项预先注册的实验(N = 358)的结果中得到了支持,该实验表明,当参与者在阅读了食品行业如何破坏自主饮食决定后感到抵触时,他们更愿意减少肉类消费。研究结果表明,利用抗拒来利用行为改变可能为既定的沟通策略提供一个有希望的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Role of User Participation in Emotional Contagion and Coping in Cancer Vlog Communities on YouTube. Much More Than Pretty Words: Poetry About the COVID-19 Vaccine Brings Healing and Community. The Struggle to Be "Fully Human": Women's Communicative Disenfranchisement and Ideological Formations in the U.S. Healthcare System. Analyzing the Discursive Framing of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) in U.S. News Media: A Comparative Study of Benefits, Persuasion Methods, and Temporal Trends. Key Storytellers of Health Information Among Spanish-Speaking Latino Sexual Minority Men in the U.S.: Identifying Barriers and Facilitators to HIV Prevention and Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1