Community-based snakebite risk mapping for resource prioritisation in Eastern Province, Rwanda.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1093/trstmh/trae069
Dileepa Senajith Ediriweera, Dieudonne Hakizimana, Peter J Diggle, Janna M Schurer
{"title":"Community-based snakebite risk mapping for resource prioritisation in Eastern Province, Rwanda.","authors":"Dileepa Senajith Ediriweera, Dieudonne Hakizimana, Peter J Diggle, Janna M Schurer","doi":"10.1093/trstmh/trae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Snakebite envenoming is a medical emergency that requires rapid access to essential medicines and well-trained personnel. In resource-poor countries, mapping snakebite incidence can help policymakers to make evidence-based decisions for resource prioritisation. This study aimed to characterise the spatial variation in snakebite risk, and in particular to identify areas of relatively high and low risk, in Eastern Province, Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Snakebite surveillance of people bitten in 2020 was conducted in Eastern Province through household visits and case verification. Geostatistical modelling and predictive mapping were applied to data from 617 villages in six districts to develop sector-level and district-level risk maps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1217 individuals bitten by snakes across six districts. The estimated population-weighted snakebite incidence in Eastern Province was 440 (95% predictive interval 421 to 460) cases per 100 000 people, corresponding to 13 500 (95% predictive interval 12 950 to 14 150) snakebite events per year. Two sectors in the southwest, Gashanda and Jarama, showed >1500 snakebite events per 100 000 annually. The lowest incidence was observed in the north.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considerable differences exist in snakebite risk between sectors in Eastern Province, with the highest risk concentrated in the southwest. Policymakers should consider prioritising resources related to snakebite prevention, essential medicines and health worker training in this region.</p>","PeriodicalId":23218,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trae069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Snakebite envenoming is a medical emergency that requires rapid access to essential medicines and well-trained personnel. In resource-poor countries, mapping snakebite incidence can help policymakers to make evidence-based decisions for resource prioritisation. This study aimed to characterise the spatial variation in snakebite risk, and in particular to identify areas of relatively high and low risk, in Eastern Province, Rwanda.

Methods: Snakebite surveillance of people bitten in 2020 was conducted in Eastern Province through household visits and case verification. Geostatistical modelling and predictive mapping were applied to data from 617 villages in six districts to develop sector-level and district-level risk maps.

Results: There were 1217 individuals bitten by snakes across six districts. The estimated population-weighted snakebite incidence in Eastern Province was 440 (95% predictive interval 421 to 460) cases per 100 000 people, corresponding to 13 500 (95% predictive interval 12 950 to 14 150) snakebite events per year. Two sectors in the southwest, Gashanda and Jarama, showed >1500 snakebite events per 100 000 annually. The lowest incidence was observed in the north.

Conclusions: Considerable differences exist in snakebite risk between sectors in Eastern Province, with the highest risk concentrated in the southwest. Policymakers should consider prioritising resources related to snakebite prevention, essential medicines and health worker training in this region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卢旺达东部省基于社区的蛇咬伤风险绘图,以确定资源优先次序。
背景:蛇咬伤是一种医疗紧急情况,需要快速获得基本药物和训练有素的人员。在资源贫乏的国家,绘制蛇咬伤发生率地图可以帮助决策者做出基于证据的资源优先排序决策。本研究旨在描述卢旺达东部省蛇咬伤风险的空间变化特征,特别是确定相对较高和较低风险的地区。方法:采用家访和病例核查相结合的方法,对东部省2020年被蛇咬伤人群进行蛇咬伤监测。对6个地区617个村庄的数据进行地质统计建模和预测制图,绘制部门级和地区级风险地图。结果:6个区共1217人被蛇咬伤。东部省估计的人口加权蛇咬伤发生率为每10万人440例(95%预测区间为421 ~ 460例),相当于每年发生13500例(95%预测区间为12950 ~ 14150例)蛇咬伤事件。西南的两个地区,加山达和贾拉马,每年每10万人中有1500人被蛇咬伤。发病率最低的是北方。结论:东部省份不同地区蛇咬伤风险存在较大差异,西南地区蛇咬伤风险最高。决策者应考虑在该地区优先考虑与蛇咬伤预防、基本药物和卫生工作者培训有关的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
115
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene publishes authoritative and impactful original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of tropical medicine.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of variables associated with snakebite risk in spatial and temporal analyses. Micronutrient status and risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in Indonesian tuberculosis case contacts. Anti-M2-pyruvate kinase autoantibodies are correlated with digestive damage in human Chagas disease. What is new in the treatment of snakebite envenoming? Opportunities and challenges. Redefining the severity of orofacial tissue damage caused by noma: a novel classification approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1