Adopting the human factors analysis and classification system into emergency medicine morbidity and mortality rounds: a quality improvement initiative.

IF 2.4 CJEM Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00837-7
Nicholas Villa, Michael Baskey, Constance LeBlanc
{"title":"Adopting the human factors analysis and classification system into emergency medicine morbidity and mortality rounds: a quality improvement initiative.","authors":"Nicholas Villa, Michael Baskey, Constance LeBlanc","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00837-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This initiative assessed the integration of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, adapted from aviation, into emergency medicine morbidity and mortality rounds. The objective was to determine whether incorporating the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System could lead to a perceived increase in the overall quality of morbidity and mortality presentations through the standardization of classifying cause factors of medical errors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved eight emergency medicine residents who applied the adapted Human Factors Analysis and Classification System framework to their morbidity and mortality case presentations over 6 months. Data were collected through surveys completed by presenters and morbidity and mortality audience members. These assessed four main outcomes: relevance, feasibility, quality, and acceptability of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The integration of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System was positively perceived across all outcome measures. Presenters and audience members rated cause factor identification as important (100%), indicating the relevance of Human Factors Analysis and Classification System in morbidity and mortality rounds. Feasibility assessments showed a mean score of 4.25 out of 5, indicating favorable ease of use. The quality assessment mean score was 3.97 out of 5, indicating perceived improvement in cause factor identification. Presenters (62.5% Strongly Agree, 37.5% Agree) and audience members (73% Yes, 21.62% Undecided, 5.4% No) expressed acceptability and support for continued Human Factors Analysis and Classification System use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System into morbidity and mortality rounds in the Department of Emergency Medicine was well-received and led to a perceived increase in the quality of cause factor identification. Both presenters and audience members endorsed the use of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, suggesting its desirability for sustained integration. The results of this study pave the way for future quality improvement initiatives, including the adaptability of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System across various medical departments and its potential to enhance cause factor classification in morbidity and mortality rounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00837-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This initiative assessed the integration of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, adapted from aviation, into emergency medicine morbidity and mortality rounds. The objective was to determine whether incorporating the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System could lead to a perceived increase in the overall quality of morbidity and mortality presentations through the standardization of classifying cause factors of medical errors.

Methods: This study involved eight emergency medicine residents who applied the adapted Human Factors Analysis and Classification System framework to their morbidity and mortality case presentations over 6 months. Data were collected through surveys completed by presenters and morbidity and mortality audience members. These assessed four main outcomes: relevance, feasibility, quality, and acceptability of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System framework.

Results: The integration of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System was positively perceived across all outcome measures. Presenters and audience members rated cause factor identification as important (100%), indicating the relevance of Human Factors Analysis and Classification System in morbidity and mortality rounds. Feasibility assessments showed a mean score of 4.25 out of 5, indicating favorable ease of use. The quality assessment mean score was 3.97 out of 5, indicating perceived improvement in cause factor identification. Presenters (62.5% Strongly Agree, 37.5% Agree) and audience members (73% Yes, 21.62% Undecided, 5.4% No) expressed acceptability and support for continued Human Factors Analysis and Classification System use.

Conclusion: Integrating the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System into morbidity and mortality rounds in the Department of Emergency Medicine was well-received and led to a perceived increase in the quality of cause factor identification. Both presenters and audience members endorsed the use of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, suggesting its desirability for sustained integration. The results of this study pave the way for future quality improvement initiatives, including the adaptability of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System across various medical departments and its potential to enhance cause factor classification in morbidity and mortality rounds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在急诊医学发病率和死亡率查房中采用人为因素分析和分类系统:一项质量改进举措。
目标:这一倡议评估了从航空中改编的人因分析和分类系统在急诊医学发病率和死亡率回合中的整合情况。目的是确定纳入人为因素分析和分类系统是否可以通过对医疗差错原因因素进行标准化分类,从而提高发病率和死亡率报告的总体质量。方法:本研究涉及8名急诊住院医师,他们采用改编的人因分析和分类系统框架对6个月的发病率和死亡率病例进行报告。数据是通过演讲者和发病率和死亡率听众完成的调查收集的。这些评估了四个主要结果:人因分析和分类系统框架的相关性、可行性、质量和可接受性。结果:人因分析和分类系统的整合在所有结果测量中都得到了积极的感知。演讲者和听众认为病因识别很重要(100%),表明人因分析和分类系统在发病率和死亡率回合中的相关性。可行性评估的平均得分为4.25分(满分5分),表明易用性良好。质量评估平均得分为3.97分(满分5分),表明在病因识别方面有所改善。演讲者(62.5%强烈同意,37.5%同意)和听众(73%同意,21.62%未定,5.4%不同意)表示可以接受并支持继续使用人为因素分析和分类系统。结论:将人因分析与分类系统整合到急诊科的发病与死亡查房中得到了广泛的认可,并显著提高了病因识别的质量。演讲者和听众成员都赞同使用人因分析和分类系统,表明它适合持续整合。本研究的结果为未来的质量改进举措铺平了道路,包括人因分析和分类系统在各个医疗部门的适应性,以及它在发病率和死亡率轮次中加强原因分类的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Just the facts: angioedema in the emergency department. Advancing emergency medicine: embracing new horizons. Rural Canadian emergency physician experiences using point-of-care ultrasound. Andexanet for factor Xa inhibitor-associated acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Crowned dens syndrome: a rare differential diagnosis of meningitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1