Perspectives of UK Physiotherapists With Expertise in Rheumatology on the Barriers and Facilitators Influencing the Identification of Axial Spondyloarthritis by First Contact Practitioners in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Musculoskeletal Care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1002/msc.70031
Carissa Jones, Gerard Greene
{"title":"Perspectives of UK Physiotherapists With Expertise in Rheumatology on the Barriers and Facilitators Influencing the Identification of Axial Spondyloarthritis by First Contact Practitioners in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Carissa Jones, Gerard Greene","doi":"10.1002/msc.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) poses a significant diagnostic challenge to health care professionals, with opportunities for early recognition often being missed in primary care. With musculoskeletal First Contact Practitioners (FCPs) rapidly becoming common place in primary care settings, the question is raised as to whether FCPs are adequately considering axSpA as a potential diagnosis. Swift recognition and timely referral are the antecedents to early diagnosis and better outcomes for people with suspected axSpA; therefore, it is imperative that FCPs can readily identify this condition. To date, no research has been conducted to thoroughly understand the determinants influencing axSpA identification by FCPs specifically.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore perceived barriers and facilitators to axSpA identification by FCPs in primary care according to UK physiotherapists with rheumatology expertise.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative research design was undertaken using a constructivist methodological approach. Data were collected via virtual semi-structured interviews and analysed using a grounded theory coding strategy to identify key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten physiotherapists with expertise in rheumatology were recruited using purposive sampling. Four themes pertaining to barriers were identified: (1) disease-specific factors, (2) patient factors, (3) clinician factors, and (4) system factors. Five themes relating to facilitators emerged: (1) education and training, (2) axSpA screening, (3) referral pathways, (4) clinical governance around the FCP role, and (5) peer support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings highlight a multitude of barriers that may impede the identification of axSpA by FCPs. Participants also proposed several solutions to help overcome these obstacles, thereby facilitating earlier diagnosis for individuals with the condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"e70031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) poses a significant diagnostic challenge to health care professionals, with opportunities for early recognition often being missed in primary care. With musculoskeletal First Contact Practitioners (FCPs) rapidly becoming common place in primary care settings, the question is raised as to whether FCPs are adequately considering axSpA as a potential diagnosis. Swift recognition and timely referral are the antecedents to early diagnosis and better outcomes for people with suspected axSpA; therefore, it is imperative that FCPs can readily identify this condition. To date, no research has been conducted to thoroughly understand the determinants influencing axSpA identification by FCPs specifically.

Aim: To explore perceived barriers and facilitators to axSpA identification by FCPs in primary care according to UK physiotherapists with rheumatology expertise.

Method: A qualitative research design was undertaken using a constructivist methodological approach. Data were collected via virtual semi-structured interviews and analysed using a grounded theory coding strategy to identify key themes.

Results: Ten physiotherapists with expertise in rheumatology were recruited using purposive sampling. Four themes pertaining to barriers were identified: (1) disease-specific factors, (2) patient factors, (3) clinician factors, and (4) system factors. Five themes relating to facilitators emerged: (1) education and training, (2) axSpA screening, (3) referral pathways, (4) clinical governance around the FCP role, and (5) peer support.

Conclusion: Study findings highlight a multitude of barriers that may impede the identification of axSpA by FCPs. Participants also proposed several solutions to help overcome these obstacles, thereby facilitating earlier diagnosis for individuals with the condition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有风湿病学专业知识的英国物理治疗师对初级保健中首次接触从业者识别轴性脊柱炎的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项定性研究。
背景:轴性脊柱炎(axSpA)对卫生保健专业人员提出了重大的诊断挑战,在初级保健中经常错过早期识别的机会。随着肌肉骨骼首次接触医生(fcp)在初级保健机构中迅速普及,问题是fcp是否充分考虑到axSpA作为潜在的诊断。快速识别和及时转诊是早期诊断和预后较好的前提;因此,fcp必须能够很容易地识别这种情况。迄今为止,还没有研究深入了解影响fcp特异性鉴定axSpA的决定因素。目的:根据英国具有风湿病学专业知识的物理治疗师,探讨初级保健中FCPs识别axSpA的感知障碍和促进因素。方法:采用建构主义方法论进行定性研究设计。通过虚拟半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用扎根理论编码策略进行分析,以确定关键主题。结果:采用有目的的抽样方法招募了10名具有风湿病学专业知识的物理治疗师。确定了与障碍有关的四个主题:(1)疾病特异性因素,(2)患者因素,(3)临床医生因素,(4)系统因素。与辅导员相关的五个主题出现了:(1)教育和培训,(2)axSpA筛查,(3)转诊途径,(4)围绕FCP角色的临床治理,以及(5)同伴支持。结论:研究结果强调了许多可能阻碍fcp识别axSpA的障碍。与会者还提出了一些解决方案,以帮助克服这些障碍,从而促进对患有这种疾病的个人的早期诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
期刊最新文献
Pain Catastrophizing Is Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Gaps in Evidence-Based Recommendations for Low Back Pain: Analysis of the Accuracy of the Care Pathway in Primary Care. Knee-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Young Adults: A Scoping Meta-Review. Effect of Motivational Interviewing and Exercise on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Perspectives of UK Physiotherapists With Expertise in Rheumatology on the Barriers and Facilitators Influencing the Identification of Axial Spondyloarthritis by First Contact Practitioners in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1