[Research on RULA, REBA and OWAS based exposure risk assessment methods].

H Zhao, N Jia, S W Mo, Z X Wang
{"title":"[Research on RULA, REBA and OWAS based exposure risk assessment methods].","authors":"H Zhao, N Jia, S W Mo, Z X Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240509-00206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To accurately identify occupational health and safety hazards in different industries with distinct characteristics, a comprehensive occupational ergonomics assessment scale was developed by integrating the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) evaluation framework, the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and the Ovako Working Posture Analysing System (OWAS) . <b>Methods:</b> Between May 2023 and May 2024, based on the proportional reasoning method and segmented function method, the algorithm logic of RULA and REBA was aligned, and the evaluation rules for the revision content of the innovation scale were inferred using the method of proportion reasoning. Twenty postures were randomly selected for correlation verification. <b>Results:</b> The results showed that at a significance level of α=0.01, the normalized score of the comprehensive ergonomic assessment scale had a correlation coefficient of <i>r</i>=0.845 with RULA and <i>r</i>=0.633 with REBA. The behavioral level score of the comprehensive ergonomic assessment scale had a correlation coefficient of <i>r</i>=0.911 with RULA and <i>r</i>=0.737 with REBA, indicating significant correlations. <b>Conclusion:</b> The innovative comprehensive ergonomic assessment scale has high reliability and can be used for work activities in different workplaces and work contents, promoting the standardization of ergonomic assessment of occupational exposure hazards.</p>","PeriodicalId":23958,"journal":{"name":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","volume":"42 12","pages":"918-926"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240509-00206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To accurately identify occupational health and safety hazards in different industries with distinct characteristics, a comprehensive occupational ergonomics assessment scale was developed by integrating the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) evaluation framework, the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and the Ovako Working Posture Analysing System (OWAS) . Methods: Between May 2023 and May 2024, based on the proportional reasoning method and segmented function method, the algorithm logic of RULA and REBA was aligned, and the evaluation rules for the revision content of the innovation scale were inferred using the method of proportion reasoning. Twenty postures were randomly selected for correlation verification. Results: The results showed that at a significance level of α=0.01, the normalized score of the comprehensive ergonomic assessment scale had a correlation coefficient of r=0.845 with RULA and r=0.633 with REBA. The behavioral level score of the comprehensive ergonomic assessment scale had a correlation coefficient of r=0.911 with RULA and r=0.737 with REBA, indicating significant correlations. Conclusion: The innovative comprehensive ergonomic assessment scale has high reliability and can be used for work activities in different workplaces and work contents, promoting the standardization of ergonomic assessment of occupational exposure hazards.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[基于RULA、REBA和OWAS的暴露风险评估方法研究]。
目的:结合快速上肢评估(RULA)评估框架、快速全身评估(REBA)和Ovako工作姿势分析系统(OWAS),为准确识别不同行业具有不同特点的职业健康与安全危害,编制了一套综合职业人机工程学评估量表。方法:在2023年5月至2024年5月期间,基于比例推理法和分段函数法,对RULA和REBA的算法逻辑进行对齐,并利用比例推理法推断创新量表修订内容的评价规则。随机选取20种体位进行相关性验证。结果:结果显示,在α=0.01的显著性水平下,归一化评分与RULA的相关系数为r=0.845,与REBA的相关系数为r=0.633。综合工效学评价量表行为水平评分与RULA的相关系数为r=0.911,与REBA的相关系数为r=0.737,相关性显著。结论:创新的人机工效综合评价量表可靠性高,可用于不同工作场所的工作活动和工作内容,促进了职业暴露危害人机工效评价的规范化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9764
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Effects of muscle fatigue on urine metabolites in automobile manufacturing workers based on untargeted metabolomics]. [Interpretation of Ergonomic guidelines for the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders part 6: Wooden furniture manufacturing work (T/WSJD 14.6-2024)]. [Research on RULA, REBA and OWAS based exposure risk assessment methods]. [Strengthen research on the prevention and control of work-related musculoskeletal disorders to support occupational health protection actions]. [Structural equation analysis and modeling of adverse ergonomic factors for lower back pain].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1