The ultrasound competency assessment tool for evaluation of early pregnancy with POCUS.

IF 2.4 CJEM Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00839-5
Colin Bell, Natalie Wagner, Andrew Hall, Joseph Newbigging, Louise Rang, Tatiana Vukadinovic, Conor McKaigney
{"title":"The ultrasound competency assessment tool for evaluation of early pregnancy with POCUS.","authors":"Colin Bell, Natalie Wagner, Andrew Hall, Joseph Newbigging, Louise Rang, Tatiana Vukadinovic, Conor McKaigney","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00839-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>POCUS is a core emergency medicine skill and mainstay of early pregnancy assessment. The ultrasound competency assessment tool was developed as an entrustment-based assessment tool for use by content experts evaluating trainees performing multiple POCUS study types. The objective of this study was to evaluate the scoring and extrapolation inferences of the tool within Kane's validity framework when used to assess trainees performing an early pregnancy POCUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentered study of emergency medicine residents participating in a POCUS assessment. After a background questionnaire, participants were read a case stem requesting a POCUS evaluation of an early pregnancy patient. Trainees were independently assessed by two fellowship-trained faculty. Descriptive statistics and two-way random, intraclass correlation coefficients, Cronbach's alpha were calculated on the merged data and used to assess all domains. Domain scores and an entrustment score for each participant were used to create a composite score. A one-way analysis of variance was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36 trainees and 5 assessors completed the study. When used to assess trainee POCUS performance in early pregnancy, the tool demonstrated good to excellent interrater reliability for image acquisition, image generation, clinical integration, and entrustment (intraclass correlation coefficients 80-91 p < .001). The preparation domain had poor, but statistically significant interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.46 p = .04). An analysis of variance suggested the POCUS performance scores differed based on prior experience [F(2,32) = 3.74, p = .021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study adds further validity evidence relating to scoring and extrapolation of the ultrasound competency assessment tool when used to assess trainees performing a POCUS study in early pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00839-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: POCUS is a core emergency medicine skill and mainstay of early pregnancy assessment. The ultrasound competency assessment tool was developed as an entrustment-based assessment tool for use by content experts evaluating trainees performing multiple POCUS study types. The objective of this study was to evaluate the scoring and extrapolation inferences of the tool within Kane's validity framework when used to assess trainees performing an early pregnancy POCUS.

Methods: This was a multicentered study of emergency medicine residents participating in a POCUS assessment. After a background questionnaire, participants were read a case stem requesting a POCUS evaluation of an early pregnancy patient. Trainees were independently assessed by two fellowship-trained faculty. Descriptive statistics and two-way random, intraclass correlation coefficients, Cronbach's alpha were calculated on the merged data and used to assess all domains. Domain scores and an entrustment score for each participant were used to create a composite score. A one-way analysis of variance was performed.

Results: 36 trainees and 5 assessors completed the study. When used to assess trainee POCUS performance in early pregnancy, the tool demonstrated good to excellent interrater reliability for image acquisition, image generation, clinical integration, and entrustment (intraclass correlation coefficients 80-91 p < .001). The preparation domain had poor, but statistically significant interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.46 p = .04). An analysis of variance suggested the POCUS performance scores differed based on prior experience [F(2,32) = 3.74, p = .021).

Conclusion: This study adds further validity evidence relating to scoring and extrapolation of the ultrasound competency assessment tool when used to assess trainees performing a POCUS study in early pregnancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声能力评估工具对早期妊娠POCUS的评价。
目的:POCUS是一项核心急诊医学技能,也是早期妊娠评估的支柱。超声能力评估工具是一种基于委托的评估工具,供内容专家评估执行多种POCUS研究类型的受训者使用。本研究的目的是评估该工具在凯恩效度框架内的评分和外推推断,用于评估早期妊娠POCUS的受训者。方法:本研究是一项多中心研究,涉及参加POCUS评估的急诊科住院医师。在完成一份背景调查问卷后,参与者阅读了一份要求对一位早期妊娠患者进行POCUS评估的病例报告。受训人员由两名获得研究金培训的教员独立评估。对合并的数据计算描述性统计、双向随机、类内相关系数、Cronbach’s alpha,并用于评估所有领域。领域得分和每个参与者的委托得分被用来创建一个综合得分。进行单因素方差分析。结果:36名学员和5名评估员完成了研究。当用于评估受训者在妊娠早期的POCUS表现时,该工具在图像采集、图像生成、临床整合和委托方面表现出良好至优异的相互信度(类内相关系数80-91 p)。结论:本研究进一步增加了与超声能力评估工具评分和外推相关的效度证据,用于评估受训者在妊娠早期进行POCUS研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Just the facts: angioedema in the emergency department. Advancing emergency medicine: embracing new horizons. Rural Canadian emergency physician experiences using point-of-care ultrasound. Andexanet for factor Xa inhibitor-associated acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Crowned dens syndrome: a rare differential diagnosis of meningitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1