An updated overview of orthognathic surgery practices in France.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102210
Noémie Vanden Haute, Emma Bach, Pierre Bouletreau, Alice Prevost, Pierre Corre, Louis Brochet, Nicolas Graillon, Andrea Varazzani
{"title":"An updated overview of orthognathic surgery practices in France.","authors":"Noémie Vanden Haute, Emma Bach, Pierre Bouletreau, Alice Prevost, Pierre Corre, Louis Brochet, Nicolas Graillon, Andrea Varazzani","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orthognathic surgery is a fundamental component of a maxillofacial surgeon's practice. In France, 510 specialists actively practice oral and maxillofacial surgery. In OMFs, despite the existence of evidence-based recommendation that address diagnosis, treatment planning, and operating methods, each surgeon/institution has developed an individual approach towards clinical management. This study comprehensively overviews the current practices of French orthognathic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was electronically sent to 500 oral and maxillofacial surgeons in France, some of whom practiced orthognathic surgery and some of whom did not. The answers were anonymous.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained 52 responses. With consensus on 12 of the practical, economic, and peri-operative questions. We didn't find difference on any topics where the surgeon has his residence or the age of the surgeon. Management and correction of occlusal disorders were the primary indications for osteotomy. Of all responders, 42 % were in private practice. Both virtual and conventional planning methods were used, with no clear preference for either method. During bimaxillary surgery, 76 % of surgeons initially osteotomised and stabilised the maxilla; 69 % used an intermediate splint. ERAS protocols are not used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is an update and it provides new information compared a 2002 report on orthognathic surgery in France. It highlights a consensus on conventional planning but no significant influence from academic centers, age, or experience on surgical practices. New technologies and ERAS protocols are underused despite their benefits for safer surgeries. There is a lack of standardized procedures, leading to varied practices despite a national teaching program. More data and practitioner involvement are needed to develop French and European guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Orthognathic surgery is a fundamental component of a maxillofacial surgeon's practice. In France, 510 specialists actively practice oral and maxillofacial surgery. In OMFs, despite the existence of evidence-based recommendation that address diagnosis, treatment planning, and operating methods, each surgeon/institution has developed an individual approach towards clinical management. This study comprehensively overviews the current practices of French orthognathic surgeons.

Methods: A questionnaire was electronically sent to 500 oral and maxillofacial surgeons in France, some of whom practiced orthognathic surgery and some of whom did not. The answers were anonymous.

Results: We obtained 52 responses. With consensus on 12 of the practical, economic, and peri-operative questions. We didn't find difference on any topics where the surgeon has his residence or the age of the surgeon. Management and correction of occlusal disorders were the primary indications for osteotomy. Of all responders, 42 % were in private practice. Both virtual and conventional planning methods were used, with no clear preference for either method. During bimaxillary surgery, 76 % of surgeons initially osteotomised and stabilised the maxilla; 69 % used an intermediate splint. ERAS protocols are not used.

Conclusion: This study is an update and it provides new information compared a 2002 report on orthognathic surgery in France. It highlights a consensus on conventional planning but no significant influence from academic centers, age, or experience on surgical practices. New technologies and ERAS protocols are underused despite their benefits for safer surgeries. There is a lack of standardized procedures, leading to varied practices despite a national teaching program. More data and practitioner involvement are needed to develop French and European guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国正颌外科实践的最新概述。
简介:正颌手术是颌面外科医生实践的基本组成部分。在法国,有510名专家积极从事口腔颌面外科手术。在omf中,尽管存在针对诊断、治疗计划和手术方法的循证建议,但每个外科医生/机构都制定了自己的临床管理方法。这项研究全面概述了目前法国正颌外科医生的做法。方法:以电子方式向500名法国口腔颌面外科医生发送调查问卷,其中一些进行了正颌手术,一些没有。答案是匿名的。结果:共获得52份回复。在12个实用、经济和围手术期问题上达成共识。我们没有发现任何关于外科医生居住地或年龄的差异。治疗和矫正咬合障碍是截骨术的主要适应症。在所有回应者中,42%是私人执业。虚拟和传统规划方法都被使用,没有明确的偏好。在双颌手术中,76%的外科医生首先进行截骨并稳定上颌骨;69%的患者使用中间夹板。不使用ERAS协议。结论:这项研究是一个更新,它提供了新的信息,比较2002年报告在法国的正颌手术。它强调了对常规计划的共识,但没有来自学术中心、年龄或经验对手术实践的重大影响。尽管新技术和ERAS协议对更安全的手术有好处,但它们并未得到充分利用。尽管有一个全国性的教学计划,但由于缺乏标准化的程序,导致实践各不相同。制定法国和欧洲的指导方针需要更多的数据和从业人员的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
305
期刊介绍: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics. Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
期刊最新文献
Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Implants for the Rehabilitations of Lateral Incisors Agenesis - a case series. NKAP: a new m6A RNA binding protein predicts prognosis and immunotherapy response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The oral and maxillofacial manifestations of Stickler syndrome: a systematic review. Proposal of staging system and treatment guideline for diagnostically challenging primary intra-osseous carcinoma: A retrospective single-center case series and literature review. Associations of Lifestyle Factors with Oral Cancer Risk: An Umbrella Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1