[Visions and repercussions of identity-release in oocyte and sperm donors: Descriptive survey among gamete donors].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.gofs.2024.12.005
Clémence Cirade, Inès Braham, Jérôme Delotte, Samir Boukaidi, Sarah Dupuis, Adeline Morisot, Valérie Benoit, Nicolas Chevalier
{"title":"[Visions and repercussions of identity-release in oocyte and sperm donors: Descriptive survey among gamete donors].","authors":"Clémence Cirade, Inès Braham, Jérôme Delotte, Samir Boukaidi, Sarah Dupuis, Adeline Morisot, Valérie Benoit, Nicolas Chevalier","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Bioethics Law of August 2nd, 2021 established access to origins for people conceived by gamete donation. Two years after the implementation of this disposition, what is the proportion of former gamete donors informed about access to origins, and what is their position on this matter? What could be the potential repercussions of this new law on them?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective single-center cohort study using questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When former gamete donors were asked about access to origins, only 53% of oocytes donors and 71% of sperm donors were aware of this measure. When participants were asked about the ideal method of donation, it emerged that 41% of female donors and 47% of male donors were in favour of access to their identifying data for the person resulting from the donation. More than half were in favour of access to non-identifying and medical data. If one day someone conceived from their donation requested access to their identifying data, 62% of oocytes donors and 56% of sperm donors would grant it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of our participants expressed the desire to benefit from information on possible descendants resulting from their donation. Among the donors interviewed, only half are informed of the legislation introducing access to origins, now two years after its implementation. These results encourage us to strengthen communication efforts around access to origins.</p>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2024.12.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Bioethics Law of August 2nd, 2021 established access to origins for people conceived by gamete donation. Two years after the implementation of this disposition, what is the proportion of former gamete donors informed about access to origins, and what is their position on this matter? What could be the potential repercussions of this new law on them?

Methods: Retrospective single-center cohort study using questionnaires.

Results: When former gamete donors were asked about access to origins, only 53% of oocytes donors and 71% of sperm donors were aware of this measure. When participants were asked about the ideal method of donation, it emerged that 41% of female donors and 47% of male donors were in favour of access to their identifying data for the person resulting from the donation. More than half were in favour of access to non-identifying and medical data. If one day someone conceived from their donation requested access to their identifying data, 62% of oocytes donors and 56% of sperm donors would grant it.

Conclusions: A significant proportion of our participants expressed the desire to benefit from information on possible descendants resulting from their donation. Among the donors interviewed, only half are informed of the legislation introducing access to origins, now two years after its implementation. These results encourage us to strengthen communication efforts around access to origins.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie est un mensuel scientifique d''information et de formation destiné aux gynécologues, aux obstétriciens, aux sénologues et aux biologistes de la reproduction. La revue, dans ses éditoriaux, articles originaux, mises au point, lettres à la rédaction et autres rubriques, donne une information actualisée ayant trait à l''obstétrique et à la gynécologie et aux différentes spécialités développées à partir de ces deux pôles : médecine de la reproduction, médecine maternelle et fœtale, périnatalité, endocrinologie, chirurgie gynécologique, cancérologie pelvienne, sénologie, sexualité, psychosomatique…
期刊最新文献
[Recommendations for clinical practice: Prevention and management of varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection during pregnancy and the perinatal period (extended version)]. [How do I do... clitoral reconstructive surgery after ritual excision in ten steps]. [Management of a fetus suspected of differences of sex development (DSD).] [Visions and repercussions of identity-release in oocyte and sperm donors: Descriptive survey among gamete donors]. [Increasing the cumulative live birth rate: Low-grade blastocysts, potential overlook].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1