{"title":"Effectiveness of pharmacist-managed oncology ambulatory care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Taiwan.","authors":"Ding-Cheng Liu, Chuan-Lun Hung, Yi-Wen Chen, Li-Na Kuo, Yen-Chun Hsin, Chun-Nan Kuo","doi":"10.38212/2224-6614.3528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is commonly treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, adverse events from such treatment can lead to treatment discontinuation and additional medical expenditures. Ambulatory care from oncology pharmacists in patient education and symptom management can benefit patients with NSCLC. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of an oncology pharmacy service at a medical center in Taiwan. We retrospectively enrolled 137 patients with NSCLC who initiated treatment with afatinib, gefitinib, or erlotinib between January 2017 and December 2021; 40 of them utilized the oncology pharmacy service (intervention group), and the remaining 97 did not (nonintervention group). To determine the effectiveness of the oncology pharmacy service, we analyzed the following outcomes: adverse event rates, number of hospital visits (unexpected outpatient department visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalization), and medical expenditure. The intervention group had significantly more skin-related adverse events (acneiform rash: 75% vs. 49%; mucositis: 40% vs. 21%; dermatitis: 30% vs. 9%; and paronychia: 85% vs. 28%) but significantly fewer monthly emergency department visits (0.04 vs. 0.17) and unexpected outpatient department visits (0.15 vs. 0.34). The intervention group also had significantly lower expenditure for emergency department visits (NT$166.4 vs. NT$734.8) and nonsignificantly lower expenditure for outpatient department visits. Our findings indicate the value of pharmacist-managed ambulatory oncology care. Although this service did not reduce the incidence rates of adverse events, it reduced the number of unplanned outpatient and emergency department visits and reduced the emergency department expenditure of patients with NSCLC receiving TKIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":358,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food and Drug Analysis","volume":"32 4","pages":"558-567"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food and Drug Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.3528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is commonly treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, adverse events from such treatment can lead to treatment discontinuation and additional medical expenditures. Ambulatory care from oncology pharmacists in patient education and symptom management can benefit patients with NSCLC. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of an oncology pharmacy service at a medical center in Taiwan. We retrospectively enrolled 137 patients with NSCLC who initiated treatment with afatinib, gefitinib, or erlotinib between January 2017 and December 2021; 40 of them utilized the oncology pharmacy service (intervention group), and the remaining 97 did not (nonintervention group). To determine the effectiveness of the oncology pharmacy service, we analyzed the following outcomes: adverse event rates, number of hospital visits (unexpected outpatient department visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalization), and medical expenditure. The intervention group had significantly more skin-related adverse events (acneiform rash: 75% vs. 49%; mucositis: 40% vs. 21%; dermatitis: 30% vs. 9%; and paronychia: 85% vs. 28%) but significantly fewer monthly emergency department visits (0.04 vs. 0.17) and unexpected outpatient department visits (0.15 vs. 0.34). The intervention group also had significantly lower expenditure for emergency department visits (NT$166.4 vs. NT$734.8) and nonsignificantly lower expenditure for outpatient department visits. Our findings indicate the value of pharmacist-managed ambulatory oncology care. Although this service did not reduce the incidence rates of adverse events, it reduced the number of unplanned outpatient and emergency department visits and reduced the emergency department expenditure of patients with NSCLC receiving TKIs.
非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)通常使用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗。然而,这种治疗的不良事件可能导致治疗中断和额外的医疗支出。肿瘤药师在患者教育和症状管理方面的门诊护理可以使非小细胞肺癌患者受益。在本研究中,我们评估台湾某医疗中心肿瘤药房服务的有效性。我们回顾性招募了137例在2017年1月至2021年12月期间开始接受阿法替尼、吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的NSCLC患者;其中40例使用肿瘤药学服务(干预组),97例未使用肿瘤药学服务(非干预组)。为了确定肿瘤药房服务的有效性,我们分析了以下结果:不良事件发生率、医院就诊次数(意外门诊就诊、急诊科就诊和住院)和医疗支出。干预组有更多的皮肤相关不良事件(痤疮样皮疹:75% vs 49%;粘膜炎:40% vs. 21%;皮炎:30% vs. 9%;甲窦炎:85%比28%),但每月急诊科就诊次数(0.04比0.17)和意外门诊就诊次数(0.15比0.34)显著减少。干预组急诊科就诊费用显著降低(新台币166.4元对新台币734.8元),门诊部就诊费用无显著降低。我们的研究结果表明,药剂师管理的门诊肿瘤护理的价值。虽然这项服务没有降低不良事件的发生率,但它减少了非计划的门诊和急诊就诊次数,减少了接受tki治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的急诊科支出。
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to provide an international platform for scientists, researchers and academicians to promote, share and discuss new findings, current issues, and developments in the different areas of food and drug analysis.
The scope of the Journal includes analytical methodologies and biological activities in relation to food, drugs, cosmetics and traditional Chinese medicine, as well as related disciplines of topical interest to public health professionals.