Carolina Gómez-Moreno, Alan Alexis Chacón-Corral, Ayari Pérez-Méndez, Ashuin Kammar-García, Corina Ortega-Ortiz, Ana Cristina Torres-Pérez, Luis Asdruval Zepeda-Gutierrez, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Thierry Hernández-Gilsoul
{"title":"Association between a geriatric measure tool and adverse outcomes among older adults treated in an emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Carolina Gómez-Moreno, Alan Alexis Chacón-Corral, Ayari Pérez-Méndez, Ashuin Kammar-García, Corina Ortega-Ortiz, Ana Cristina Torres-Pérez, Luis Asdruval Zepeda-Gutierrez, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Thierry Hernández-Gilsoul","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03843-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic provided an ideal scenario for studying the care of the elderly population, we implemented a tool named the Geriatric Measure (GM) tool to determine the severity and need for hospitalization. The objective of the study is to evaluate if the results of a brief Geriatric Measure tool are associated with mortality and other outcomes among older adults with COVID-19 treated in the emergency department. Retrospective observational cohort study. Participants were older adults (65 years and over) who required hospitalization for SARS CoV2 pneumonia. Patients were evaluated with the GM tool and were followed-up until death or discharge and associations between GM tool scores and mortality and other outcomes were assessed. A total of 275 patients were included. The proportion of patients who died increased with every category of the GM tool. Patients in category 1 (fit with good functional status) had a mortality of 24.7% versus those in category 4 (frail with poor functional status) who had a mortality of 51%. Our results show an association between our GM tool and mortality among older adults with pneumonia caused by SARS CoV2 and treated in the emergency department, and highlight the need of individualizing care for older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03843-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic provided an ideal scenario for studying the care of the elderly population, we implemented a tool named the Geriatric Measure (GM) tool to determine the severity and need for hospitalization. The objective of the study is to evaluate if the results of a brief Geriatric Measure tool are associated with mortality and other outcomes among older adults with COVID-19 treated in the emergency department. Retrospective observational cohort study. Participants were older adults (65 years and over) who required hospitalization for SARS CoV2 pneumonia. Patients were evaluated with the GM tool and were followed-up until death or discharge and associations between GM tool scores and mortality and other outcomes were assessed. A total of 275 patients were included. The proportion of patients who died increased with every category of the GM tool. Patients in category 1 (fit with good functional status) had a mortality of 24.7% versus those in category 4 (frail with poor functional status) who had a mortality of 51%. Our results show an association between our GM tool and mortality among older adults with pneumonia caused by SARS CoV2 and treated in the emergency department, and highlight the need of individualizing care for older patients.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.