Murat Duyan, Süleyman Ibze, Nafis Vural, Hasan Can Guven, Elif Ertas, Rauf Avci, Serhat Gunlu, Yıldıray Cete
{"title":"Evaluation of ST-segment and T-wave changes associated with NSTE-ACS in patients with RBBB: a nested case-control study design.","authors":"Murat Duyan, Süleyman Ibze, Nafis Vural, Hasan Can Guven, Elif Ertas, Rauf Avci, Serhat Gunlu, Yıldıray Cete","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03855-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED) require rapid and accurate electrocardiographic (ECG) evaluation. This study aims to assess conventional ECG markers for diagnosing non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) in patients with chest discomfort and right bundle branch block (RBBB). A nested case-control design was employed to compare patients with RBBB admitted to the ED for suspected cardiac ischemia, focusing on those who developed NSTE-ACS versus those who did not. The sample consisted of 352 patients with suspected ACS and RBBB identified on ECG. Among them, 88 were diagnosed with NSTE-ACS. In the presence of RBBB, ST-segment elevation on the isoelectric line and/or positive T-waves on the ECG were significantly associated with the diagnosis of NSTE-ACS (p < 0.05). In patients who developed NSTE-ACS, the likelihood of an isoelectric ST-segment was 3.48 (95% CI 2.07-5.82) times higher, the likelihood of positive T-waves was 4.16 (95% CI 2.51-6.91) times higher, and the combination of an isoelectric ST-segment with positive T-waves was 4.81 (95% CI 2.28-8.25) times higher (p < 0.05). In addition, ST-segment depression and non-negative T-waves were significantly more frequent in patients who developed NSTE-ACS, with odds ratios of 5.78 (95% CI 3-11.3), compared to those who did not (p < 0.05). The odds ratios for ST-segment and T-wave changes were 2.81 and 3.47, respectively, with an 80% correct classification rate for predicting NSTE-ACS. Clinicians should closely monitor the presence of an isoelectric ST-segment and positive T-waves in patients with RBBB to assess for potential cardiac ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03855-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED) require rapid and accurate electrocardiographic (ECG) evaluation. This study aims to assess conventional ECG markers for diagnosing non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) in patients with chest discomfort and right bundle branch block (RBBB). A nested case-control design was employed to compare patients with RBBB admitted to the ED for suspected cardiac ischemia, focusing on those who developed NSTE-ACS versus those who did not. The sample consisted of 352 patients with suspected ACS and RBBB identified on ECG. Among them, 88 were diagnosed with NSTE-ACS. In the presence of RBBB, ST-segment elevation on the isoelectric line and/or positive T-waves on the ECG were significantly associated with the diagnosis of NSTE-ACS (p < 0.05). In patients who developed NSTE-ACS, the likelihood of an isoelectric ST-segment was 3.48 (95% CI 2.07-5.82) times higher, the likelihood of positive T-waves was 4.16 (95% CI 2.51-6.91) times higher, and the combination of an isoelectric ST-segment with positive T-waves was 4.81 (95% CI 2.28-8.25) times higher (p < 0.05). In addition, ST-segment depression and non-negative T-waves were significantly more frequent in patients who developed NSTE-ACS, with odds ratios of 5.78 (95% CI 3-11.3), compared to those who did not (p < 0.05). The odds ratios for ST-segment and T-wave changes were 2.81 and 3.47, respectively, with an 80% correct classification rate for predicting NSTE-ACS. Clinicians should closely monitor the presence of an isoelectric ST-segment and positive T-waves in patients with RBBB to assess for potential cardiac ischemia.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.