Relationship of Time to First Therapy and Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery Approach in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.007
Qusai Al Masad, Aryanna Sousa, Paola Pena, Cara J Sammartino, Ponnandai Somasundar, Thaer Abdelfattah, N Joseph Espat, Abdul S Calvino, Steve Kwon
{"title":"Relationship of Time to First Therapy and Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery Approach in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Qusai Al Masad, Aryanna Sousa, Paola Pena, Cara J Sammartino, Ponnandai Somasundar, Thaer Abdelfattah, N Joseph Espat, Abdul S Calvino, Steve Kwon","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence demonstrating overall survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgical resection over upfront surgical resection for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been mixed. The time to first therapy (TTFT) variable has not been studied as a contributing factor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide retrospective analysis using the National Cancer Database to evaluate patients with clinical stage T1 and T2 PDACs from 2010 to 2020. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the impact of NAC followed by definitive surgery compared to upfront surgery on overall survival with and without TTFT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of 43,174 patients were included-9874 patients with clinical stage T1 and 33,300 patients with T2 PDACs. There were increasing trends in the NAC approach from 2.9% in 2010 to more than 25% by 2020 and decreasing trends in the upfront surgery approach from 69.34% in 2010 to 31.87% by 2020. There were significant differences in TTFT according to the treatment choice with upfront surgery group having a significantly shorter TTFT-proportion of those receiving first treatment within the first week was 24.32% in the upfront surgery compared to 4.22% in the NAC group. In the adjusted cox regression without the TTFT variable, there was a 25% higher rate of death in the upfront surgery compared to the NAC group (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.30). When the adjusted regression was performed with addition of a TTFT interaction term, there was survival disadvantage of upfront surgery approach in patients whose TTFT occurred after 1 wk, but not in those with TTFT occurring in less than 1 wk (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study emphasizes the importance of incorporating TTFT variable when comparing NAC versus upfront surgery approach in PDAC. Future studies comparing NAC to upfront surgery in resectable PDAC should consider incorporating the TTFT variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"111-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence demonstrating overall survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgical resection over upfront surgical resection for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been mixed. The time to first therapy (TTFT) variable has not been studied as a contributing factor.

Methods: A nationwide retrospective analysis using the National Cancer Database to evaluate patients with clinical stage T1 and T2 PDACs from 2010 to 2020. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the impact of NAC followed by definitive surgery compared to upfront surgery on overall survival with and without TTFT.

Results: Total of 43,174 patients were included-9874 patients with clinical stage T1 and 33,300 patients with T2 PDACs. There were increasing trends in the NAC approach from 2.9% in 2010 to more than 25% by 2020 and decreasing trends in the upfront surgery approach from 69.34% in 2010 to 31.87% by 2020. There were significant differences in TTFT according to the treatment choice with upfront surgery group having a significantly shorter TTFT-proportion of those receiving first treatment within the first week was 24.32% in the upfront surgery compared to 4.22% in the NAC group. In the adjusted cox regression without the TTFT variable, there was a 25% higher rate of death in the upfront surgery compared to the NAC group (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.30). When the adjusted regression was performed with addition of a TTFT interaction term, there was survival disadvantage of upfront surgery approach in patients whose TTFT occurred after 1 wk, but not in those with TTFT occurring in less than 1 wk (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.17).

Conclusions: Our study emphasizes the importance of incorporating TTFT variable when comparing NAC versus upfront surgery approach in PDAC. Future studies comparing NAC to upfront surgery in resectable PDAC should consider incorporating the TTFT variable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可切除胰腺导管腺癌新辅助化疗与前期手术的首次治疗时间和生存结果的关系。
对于可切除的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC),新辅助化疗(NAC)后手术切除比术前手术切除总体生存获益的证据不一。首次治疗时间(TTFT)变量尚未被研究作为一个促进因素。方法:使用国家癌症数据库对2010年至2020年临床T1期和T2期pdac患者进行回顾性分析。使用Cox比例风险模型来评估NAC后确定手术与术前手术相比对有和没有TTFT的总生存期的影响。结果:共纳入43174例患者,其中T1期9874例,T2期33300例。NAC入路比例从2010年的2.9%上升到2020年的25%以上,前期手术入路比例从2010年的69.34%下降到2020年的31.87%。治疗选择的TTFT差异有统计学意义,前期手术组TTFT明显短于NAC组,第一周内接受首次治疗的患者比例为24.32%,而NAC组为4.22%。在没有TTFT变量的校正cox回归中,与NAC组相比,术前手术的死亡率高出25%(风险比1.25,95%置信区间1.19-1.30)。当加入TTFT相互作用项进行校正回归时,在1周后发生TTFT的患者中,术前手术入路存在生存劣势,但在不到1周的患者中没有(风险比1.01,95%置信区间0.86-1.17)。结论:我们的研究强调了在比较NAC与PDAC术前入路时纳入TTFT变量的重要性。未来比较NAC与可切除PDAC的前期手术的研究应考虑纳入TTFT变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Reducing Postoperative Opioids in Pediatric Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study. A Review of Long-Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Using Extended Criteria Donors in the United States. Classification Systems of Surgical Complexity: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Recognizing the Need for Goals of Care Conversations Among Critically Ill Surgical Patients. Immunological Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Conversion Surgery Cases for Gastric Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1