Alex Choi, Hao Deng, Mitchell Fuller, Jamie L Sparling, Min Zhu, Brooks Udelsman, Gyorgy Frendl, Marcos F Vidal Melo, Alexander Nagrebetsky
{"title":"Intraoperative FiO<sub>2</sub> and risk of impaired postoperative oxygenation in lung resection: A propensity score-weighted analysis.","authors":"Alex Choi, Hao Deng, Mitchell Fuller, Jamie L Sparling, Min Zhu, Brooks Udelsman, Gyorgy Frendl, Marcos F Vidal Melo, Alexander Nagrebetsky","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To assess whether, in a lung resection cohort with a low probability of confounding by indication, higher FiO<sub>2</sub> is associated with an increased risk of impaired postoperative oxygenation - a clinical manifestation of lung injury/dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pre-specified registry-based retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two large academic hospitals in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>2936 lung resection patients with an overall good intraoperative oxygenation (median intraoperative SpO<sub>2</sub> ≥ 95 %).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We compared patients with a higher (≥0.8) and lower (<0.8) median intraoperative FiO<sub>2</sub> after propensity score-weighting for 75 perioperative variables based on a causal inference framework. The primary outcome of impaired oxygenation was defined as at least one of the following within seven postoperative days: (1) SpO<sub>2</sub> < 92 %; (2) imputed PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> < 300 mmHg [(1) or (2) at least twice within 24 h]; (3) intensive oxygen therapy (mechanical ventilation or > 50 % oxygen or high-flow oxygen).</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among the 2936 included patients, 2171 (73.8 %) received median intraoperative FiO<sub>2</sub> ≥ 0.8. Impaired postoperative oxygenation occurred in 1627 (74.9 %) and 422 (55.2 %) patients in the higher and lower FiO<sub>2</sub> groups, respectively. In a propensity score-weighted analysis, higher intraoperative FiO<sub>2</sub> was associated with an 84 % increase in the likelihood of impaired postoperative oxygenation (OR 1.84; 95 % CI 1.60 to 2.12; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite plausible harm from hyperoxia, high intraoperative FiO<sub>2</sub> is extremely common during lung resection. Nearly three-quarters of lung resection patients with acceptable oxygenation received median intraoperative FiO<sub>2</sub> ≥ 0.8. Such higher FiO<sub>2</sub> was associated with an increased risk of impaired postoperative oxygenation - a clinically relevant manifestation of lung injury or dysfunction. This observation supports the administration of a lower (< 0.8) intraoperative FiO<sub>2</sub> and its further assessment in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"101 ","pages":"111739"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objective: To assess whether, in a lung resection cohort with a low probability of confounding by indication, higher FiO2 is associated with an increased risk of impaired postoperative oxygenation - a clinical manifestation of lung injury/dysfunction.
Setting: Two large academic hospitals in the United States.
Patients: 2936 lung resection patients with an overall good intraoperative oxygenation (median intraoperative SpO2 ≥ 95 %).
Measurements: We compared patients with a higher (≥0.8) and lower (<0.8) median intraoperative FiO2 after propensity score-weighting for 75 perioperative variables based on a causal inference framework. The primary outcome of impaired oxygenation was defined as at least one of the following within seven postoperative days: (1) SpO2 < 92 %; (2) imputed PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg [(1) or (2) at least twice within 24 h]; (3) intensive oxygen therapy (mechanical ventilation or > 50 % oxygen or high-flow oxygen).
Main results: Among the 2936 included patients, 2171 (73.8 %) received median intraoperative FiO2 ≥ 0.8. Impaired postoperative oxygenation occurred in 1627 (74.9 %) and 422 (55.2 %) patients in the higher and lower FiO2 groups, respectively. In a propensity score-weighted analysis, higher intraoperative FiO2 was associated with an 84 % increase in the likelihood of impaired postoperative oxygenation (OR 1.84; 95 % CI 1.60 to 2.12; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Despite plausible harm from hyperoxia, high intraoperative FiO2 is extremely common during lung resection. Nearly three-quarters of lung resection patients with acceptable oxygenation received median intraoperative FiO2 ≥ 0.8. Such higher FiO2 was associated with an increased risk of impaired postoperative oxygenation - a clinically relevant manifestation of lung injury or dysfunction. This observation supports the administration of a lower (< 0.8) intraoperative FiO2 and its further assessment in clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.