{"title":"The role of non-invasive stress testing in the diagnosis of coronary microvascular disease.","authors":"Aviel Shetrit, Lior Zornitzki, Ariel Banai, Ophir Freund, Reut Amar Shamir, Jeremy Ben-Shoshan, Yishay Szekely, Yaron Arbel, Shmuel Banai, Maayan Konigstein","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) is commonly observed in patients with stable angina undergoing coronary angiography. Current guidelines recommend non-invasive stress testing as the first step in diagnosing coronary microvascular disease (CMD). This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of non-invasive stress testing in patients invasively diagnosed with CMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Eligible subjects were patients with angina who underwent NIST evaluation (echocardiography/ electrocardiography stress test or single-photon emission computerized tomography) prior to coronary angiography. All patients underwent invasive evaluation of microvascular function, which included the assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve, Index of Microcirculatory Resistance, and Resistive Reserve Ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 140 patients (77 women, 67 ± 10 y/o) underwent NIST evaluation prior to coronary angiography, of whom 81 % were positive for ischemia. There was no difference in the prevalence of positive NIST between patients with abnormal compared with normal microvascular function tested invasively (81 % vs 82 %, p = 0.94). The prevalence of CMD was similar between patients with positive versus negative NIST (51 % vs 50 %, p = 0.94). Among 114 patients with positive NIST, 56 (49.2 %) had normal microvascular function, regardless of the type of stress test used (p = 0.94), the suspected territory of ischemia (p = 0.15), or the estimated severity of the ischemia (p = 0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-invasive stress testing may have a limited predictive value in the diagnosis of CMD in ANOCA patients. Larger prospective studies are required for better understanding of the role these tests in the diagnosis and definition of CMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) is commonly observed in patients with stable angina undergoing coronary angiography. Current guidelines recommend non-invasive stress testing as the first step in diagnosing coronary microvascular disease (CMD). This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of non-invasive stress testing in patients invasively diagnosed with CMD.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Eligible subjects were patients with angina who underwent NIST evaluation (echocardiography/ electrocardiography stress test or single-photon emission computerized tomography) prior to coronary angiography. All patients underwent invasive evaluation of microvascular function, which included the assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve, Index of Microcirculatory Resistance, and Resistive Reserve Ratio.
Results: Overall, 140 patients (77 women, 67 ± 10 y/o) underwent NIST evaluation prior to coronary angiography, of whom 81 % were positive for ischemia. There was no difference in the prevalence of positive NIST between patients with abnormal compared with normal microvascular function tested invasively (81 % vs 82 %, p = 0.94). The prevalence of CMD was similar between patients with positive versus negative NIST (51 % vs 50 %, p = 0.94). Among 114 patients with positive NIST, 56 (49.2 %) had normal microvascular function, regardless of the type of stress test used (p = 0.94), the suspected territory of ischemia (p = 0.15), or the estimated severity of the ischemia (p = 0.63).
Conclusion: Non-invasive stress testing may have a limited predictive value in the diagnosis of CMD in ANOCA patients. Larger prospective studies are required for better understanding of the role these tests in the diagnosis and definition of CMD.
背景:心绞痛合并非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(ANOCA)常见于接受冠状动脉造影的稳定型心绞痛患者。目前的指南推荐非侵入性压力测试作为诊断冠状动脉微血管疾病(CMD)的第一步。本研究旨在评价无创应激测试对有创诊断的CMD患者的诊断价值。方法:对前瞻性收集的资料进行回顾性分析。符合条件的受试者是在冠状动脉造影前接受NIST评估(超声心动图/心电图压力测试或单光子发射计算机断层扫描)的心绞痛患者。所有患者均行有创微血管功能评估,包括冠状动脉血流储备、微循环阻力指数和阻力储备比。结果:总体而言,140例患者(77例女性,67±10 y/o)在冠状动脉造影前接受了NIST评估,其中81%为缺血阳性。有创检测微血管功能异常患者与正常患者的NIST阳性患病率无差异(81% vs 82%, p = 0.94)。NIST阳性与阴性患者的CMD患病率相似(51% vs 50%, p = 0.94)。114例NIST阳性患者中,56例(49.2%)微血管功能正常,与使用的应激测试类型(p = 0.94)、疑似缺血区域(p = 0.15)或估计的缺血严重程度(p = 0.63)无关。结论:无创压力测试对ANOCA患者CMD的诊断有一定的预测价值。为了更好地了解这些测试在CMD的诊断和定义中的作用,需要更大规模的前瞻性研究。
期刊介绍:
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.