Health insurers grapple with UnitedHealthcare murder—and a public short on sympathy

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2879
Owen Dyer
{"title":"Health insurers grapple with UnitedHealthcare murder—and a public short on sympathy","authors":"Owen Dyer","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Headlines expressed shock and condemnation of the killing of a health insurance executive in New York. But public comment has been very different. Owen Dyer reports One should not speak ill of the dead, they say, but plenty have done just that since the murder of the UnitedHealthcare chief executive Brian Thompson. Online, at least, sympathy was at a premium. Thompson’s alleged killer, Luigi Mangione, has been depicted in memes shared by millions of people as Luigi from the Super Mario games; the patron saint of healthcare; “the Adjuster”; or being endorsed by the fictional mafia character Tony Soprano saying, “In this house, he’s a hero.” People have inserted Mangione into Facebook holiday photos to provide a tongue-in-cheek alibi, some adding “I am Spartacus.” On Amazon, Mangione merchandise sold fast before being removed from the site. Meanwhile, Thompson’s memorial Facebook page was closed after being flooded with 126 000 laughing emojis. On online forums, including those used by medical professionals, and even a Facebook page shared by health insurance workers, many comments were variations on health plan terms such as “thoughts and prior authorisations” and “after reviewing your case, sympathy was denied.” Public anger has crossed ideological lines in a rare moment of bipartisanship. On the left leaning television programme the Daily Show the audience booed when told that Mangione had been arrested. But when the prominent right wing podcaster Ben Shapiro posted a YouTube video entitled “The EVIL revolutionary left cheers murder!” he was pilloried by his own viewers. The most liked comment read: “This man [Thompson] denied 35% of claims. One was my dead parent’s heart surgery we couldn’t afford. He opted to die instead of give us the debt.” Do these online voices represent the real balance of feeling? A new poll by Emerson College suggests not quite—but …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Headlines expressed shock and condemnation of the killing of a health insurance executive in New York. But public comment has been very different. Owen Dyer reports One should not speak ill of the dead, they say, but plenty have done just that since the murder of the UnitedHealthcare chief executive Brian Thompson. Online, at least, sympathy was at a premium. Thompson’s alleged killer, Luigi Mangione, has been depicted in memes shared by millions of people as Luigi from the Super Mario games; the patron saint of healthcare; “the Adjuster”; or being endorsed by the fictional mafia character Tony Soprano saying, “In this house, he’s a hero.” People have inserted Mangione into Facebook holiday photos to provide a tongue-in-cheek alibi, some adding “I am Spartacus.” On Amazon, Mangione merchandise sold fast before being removed from the site. Meanwhile, Thompson’s memorial Facebook page was closed after being flooded with 126 000 laughing emojis. On online forums, including those used by medical professionals, and even a Facebook page shared by health insurance workers, many comments were variations on health plan terms such as “thoughts and prior authorisations” and “after reviewing your case, sympathy was denied.” Public anger has crossed ideological lines in a rare moment of bipartisanship. On the left leaning television programme the Daily Show the audience booed when told that Mangione had been arrested. But when the prominent right wing podcaster Ben Shapiro posted a YouTube video entitled “The EVIL revolutionary left cheers murder!” he was pilloried by his own viewers. The most liked comment read: “This man [Thompson] denied 35% of claims. One was my dead parent’s heart surgery we couldn’t afford. He opted to die instead of give us the debt.” Do these online voices represent the real balance of feeling? A new poll by Emerson College suggests not quite—but …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保险公司正在努力应对联合医疗公司的谋杀案——以及缺乏同情心的公众
新闻头条表达了对纽约一名健康保险公司高管被杀的震惊和谴责。但公众的评论却截然不同。据欧文·戴尔报道,人们不应该说死者的坏话,但自从联合医疗首席执行官布莱恩·汤普森被谋杀以来,很多人都这样做了。至少在网上,同情是非常宝贵的。在数百万人分享的表情包中,杀害汤普森的凶手路易吉·曼吉奥内被描绘成超级马里奥游戏中的路易吉;医疗保健的守护神;“调节器”;或者被虚构的黑手党人物托尼·索普拉诺(Tony Soprano)认可,说:“在这个房子里,他是英雄。”人们把Mangione插入Facebook的度假照片中,以提供半开玩笑的不在场证明,有些人还加上了“我是斯巴达克斯”。在亚马逊上,Mangione的商品在被下架之前卖得很快。与此同时,汤普森的Facebook纪念页面在被12.6万个笑表情淹没后被关闭。在在线论坛上,包括医疗专业人士使用的论坛,甚至是健康保险工作者分享的Facebook页面上,许多评论都是健康计划条款的变体,比如“想法和事先授权”和“在审查你的病例后,拒绝同情”。在一个罕见的两党合作时刻,公众的愤怒跨越了意识形态的界限。在左倾的电视节目《每日秀》(Daily Show)上,当被告知曼吉奥内被捕时,观众发出了嘘声。但是,当著名的右翼播客本·夏皮罗(Ben Shapiro)在YouTube上发布了一段题为“邪恶的革命左翼欢呼谋杀!”他被自己的观众嘲笑。点赞最多的评论是:“这个人(汤普森)否认了35%的指控。一件是我死去的父母的心脏手术,我们负担不起。他选择了死,而不是给我们债务。”这些网络上的声音代表了真正的情感平衡吗?爱默生学院的一项新民意调查显示,并非如此,但是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT's health AI has dangerous flaws, study warns. Matt Morgan: Why is stopping a pointless intervention so difficult? The growing threat of domestic wood burning stoves-and industry's legal attempts to shut down clean air campaigns. The art of growing older: new exhibition reflects on perceptions of ageing. Sweden won't subsidise weight loss jab because of concerns over "major economic consequences".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1