Hierarchy in surgeon-anaesthetist relationships.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.008
Jennifer M Weller
{"title":"Hierarchy in surgeon-anaesthetist relationships.","authors":"Jennifer M Weller","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Operating theatres are steeply hierarchical, and yet the hierarchy between surgeons and anaesthetists is unclear, even blurry. Both the steep hierarchy and the blurriness at the top can present a risk to patient safety through inhibiting speaking up with concerns and negotiating safe patient care. A recent study in the British Journal of Anaesthesia explores hierarchy in the surgeon-anaesthesia dyad in China, in particular, the effect of increased seniority gap between surgeons and anaesthetists on anaesthesia-related adverse outcomes. There is very limited information on hierarchy in the surgeon-anaesthetist dyad despite its pivotal importance for patient outcomes. The study prompts us to confront hierarchy in operating theatres and to address its negative effects. This might include explicit whole-team reflections on the hierarchies that divide us, working to overcome divisions through identifying our common values and goals in patient care, and building shared decision-making into our organisational structures and patient care processes so that they no longer reinforce historical hierarchies but rather reflect the needs and realities of modern healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"134 1","pages":"23-25"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Operating theatres are steeply hierarchical, and yet the hierarchy between surgeons and anaesthetists is unclear, even blurry. Both the steep hierarchy and the blurriness at the top can present a risk to patient safety through inhibiting speaking up with concerns and negotiating safe patient care. A recent study in the British Journal of Anaesthesia explores hierarchy in the surgeon-anaesthesia dyad in China, in particular, the effect of increased seniority gap between surgeons and anaesthetists on anaesthesia-related adverse outcomes. There is very limited information on hierarchy in the surgeon-anaesthetist dyad despite its pivotal importance for patient outcomes. The study prompts us to confront hierarchy in operating theatres and to address its negative effects. This might include explicit whole-team reflections on the hierarchies that divide us, working to overcome divisions through identifying our common values and goals in patient care, and building shared decision-making into our organisational structures and patient care processes so that they no longer reinforce historical hierarchies but rather reflect the needs and realities of modern healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科麻醉师关系中的等级制度。
手术室等级分明,但外科医生和麻醉师之间的等级却不清楚,甚至模糊不清。陡峭的等级制度和模糊的高层管理都可能阻碍患者表达担忧和协商安全的患者护理,从而给患者安全带来风险。《英国麻醉学杂志》(British Journal of anesthesia)最近的一项研究探讨了中国外科麻醉师的等级制度,特别是外科医生和麻醉师之间资历差距的扩大对麻醉相关不良后果的影响。尽管外科麻醉师对患者预后至关重要,但关于其等级制度的信息非常有限。这项研究促使我们正视手术室中的等级制度,并解决其负面影响。这可能包括整个团队对导致我们分裂的等级制度进行明确的反思,通过确定我们在患者护理方面的共同价值观和目标来努力克服分歧,并在我们的组织结构和患者护理流程中建立共同的决策,以便它们不再强化历史等级制度,而是反映现代医疗保健的需求和现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
The number of central nervous system-driven symptoms predicts subsequent chronic primary pain: evidence from UK Biobank. The debate rages on: physician-assisted suicide in an ethical light. Response to Br J Anaesth 2024; 133: 1352-3. Two-person verbal check to confirm tracheal intubation: evaluation of practice changes to prevent unrecognised oesophageal intubation. Clinical team flow in the perioperative environment: a qualitative single-centre study. Continuous serratus anterior block for sternotomy analgesia after cardiac surgery: a single-centre feasibility study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1